使用dea窗口分析对南部和东部非洲主要海港之间的作业效率进行比较评价

M. Mwendapole, Mahamudu Mashaka Mabuyu, Jumanne A. Karume, Lucas P. Mwisila
{"title":"使用dea窗口分析对南部和东部非洲主要海港之间的作业效率进行比较评价","authors":"M. Mwendapole, Mahamudu Mashaka Mabuyu, Jumanne A. Karume, Lucas P. Mwisila","doi":"10.52267/ijaser.2022.3501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The operations efficiency of Southern and Eastern Africa seaports was evaluated using DEA window analysis covering the period of ten years (2010-2019). The operations efficiency among the selected seaports from South and East African countries were compared and evaluated. The container throughput (TEUs), the available number of cranes, the quay length, the number of berths obtainable to hold up ships and total terminal area have been used as variables for input and output. The findings were; East African seaports have a lower container throughput volume (TEUs) and are smaller seaports size compared to South African seaports, but these East Africa seaports in general are more efficient than South African seaports. However, Durban seaport specifically in South Africa has been found to be the most efficient seaport among the six selected seaports from both regions (South and East African seaports). Moreover, the findings revealed that the least efficient seaport for the selected region over ten years is Walvis Bay seaport in South Africa. In this regard, policy maker should embrace the private and public investments as financial alternative sources. The timely, investment in port promotes a culture to modernise seaports so as to cope with the technological changes in maritime transport and improves seaport competitiveness and quality of services. The finding will be important in considering the selection of the future development strategies to be implemented by the seaports which are involved in this study.","PeriodicalId":153802,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF OPERATIONS EFFICIENCY BETWEEN MAJOR SEAPORTS IN SOUTHERN AND EASTERN AFRICA USING DEA WINDOW ANALYSIS\",\"authors\":\"M. Mwendapole, Mahamudu Mashaka Mabuyu, Jumanne A. Karume, Lucas P. Mwisila\",\"doi\":\"10.52267/ijaser.2022.3501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The operations efficiency of Southern and Eastern Africa seaports was evaluated using DEA window analysis covering the period of ten years (2010-2019). The operations efficiency among the selected seaports from South and East African countries were compared and evaluated. The container throughput (TEUs), the available number of cranes, the quay length, the number of berths obtainable to hold up ships and total terminal area have been used as variables for input and output. The findings were; East African seaports have a lower container throughput volume (TEUs) and are smaller seaports size compared to South African seaports, but these East Africa seaports in general are more efficient than South African seaports. However, Durban seaport specifically in South Africa has been found to be the most efficient seaport among the six selected seaports from both regions (South and East African seaports). Moreover, the findings revealed that the least efficient seaport for the selected region over ten years is Walvis Bay seaport in South Africa. In this regard, policy maker should embrace the private and public investments as financial alternative sources. The timely, investment in port promotes a culture to modernise seaports so as to cope with the technological changes in maritime transport and improves seaport competitiveness and quality of services. The finding will be important in considering the selection of the future development strategies to be implemented by the seaports which are involved in this study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52267/ijaser.2022.3501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52267/ijaser.2022.3501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

采用DEA窗口分析对非洲南部和东部海港的运营效率进行了为期10年(2010-2019年)的评估。对选定的南非和东非海港的作业效率进行了比较和评价。集装箱吞吐量(teu)、可用的起重机数量、码头长度、可停靠船舶的泊位数量和码头总面积被用作输入和输出的变量。研究结果是;与南非海港相比,东非海港的集装箱吞吐量(teu)较低,海港规模较小,但这些东非海港总体上比南非海港效率更高。然而,在两个区域(南非和东非海港)选定的六个海港中,南非的德班海港被认为是效率最高的海港。此外,调查结果显示,在过去十年中,选定地区效率最低的海港是南非的沃尔维斯湾海港。在这方面,决策者应接受私人和公共投资作为替代资金来源。适时的港口投资促进了海港现代化的文化,以应对海上运输的技术变革,提高海港的竞争力和服务质量。这一发现对于考虑选择参与本研究的海港将实施的未来发展战略将是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF OPERATIONS EFFICIENCY BETWEEN MAJOR SEAPORTS IN SOUTHERN AND EASTERN AFRICA USING DEA WINDOW ANALYSIS
The operations efficiency of Southern and Eastern Africa seaports was evaluated using DEA window analysis covering the period of ten years (2010-2019). The operations efficiency among the selected seaports from South and East African countries were compared and evaluated. The container throughput (TEUs), the available number of cranes, the quay length, the number of berths obtainable to hold up ships and total terminal area have been used as variables for input and output. The findings were; East African seaports have a lower container throughput volume (TEUs) and are smaller seaports size compared to South African seaports, but these East Africa seaports in general are more efficient than South African seaports. However, Durban seaport specifically in South Africa has been found to be the most efficient seaport among the six selected seaports from both regions (South and East African seaports). Moreover, the findings revealed that the least efficient seaport for the selected region over ten years is Walvis Bay seaport in South Africa. In this regard, policy maker should embrace the private and public investments as financial alternative sources. The timely, investment in port promotes a culture to modernise seaports so as to cope with the technological changes in maritime transport and improves seaport competitiveness and quality of services. The finding will be important in considering the selection of the future development strategies to be implemented by the seaports which are involved in this study.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信