猩红热和下水道气味:1855-1920年大都会公共卫生记录

A. Tanner
{"title":"猩红热和下水道气味:1855-1920年大都会公共卫生记录","authors":"A. Tanner","doi":"10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.001137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"he peculiarities of the history of public health in London have been the subject of several studies in the last twenty years, most notably by Anne Hardy, Bill Luckin, Lara Marks, Graham Mooney, John Davies and David Owen. The purpose of this contribution is not to add to the canon, but rather to make a plea for a re-examination of some of the original sources for this field, in particular the surviving reports of the metropolitan Medical Officers of Health (MOHs), which provide a unique insight, not solely into the development of public health policy and practice in the capital, but into many aspects of London life. London tended to be excluded from the provisions of much of the reforming legislation of the nineteenth century. It alone was left out of the 1835 Corporations Act, and the 1848 Public Health Act. This second Act decreed that, where a registration district recorded a death rate of over 23 per 1,000, the undertaking of remedial measures and the appointment of a Medical Officer of Health (MOH) became compulsory. In certain parts of London, most notably the East End, a death rate of","PeriodicalId":448368,"journal":{"name":"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scarlatina and Sewer Smells: Metropolitan Public Health Records 1855-1920\",\"authors\":\"A. Tanner\",\"doi\":\"10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.001137\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"he peculiarities of the history of public health in London have been the subject of several studies in the last twenty years, most notably by Anne Hardy, Bill Luckin, Lara Marks, Graham Mooney, John Davies and David Owen. The purpose of this contribution is not to add to the canon, but rather to make a plea for a re-examination of some of the original sources for this field, in particular the surviving reports of the metropolitan Medical Officers of Health (MOHs), which provide a unique insight, not solely into the development of public health policy and practice in the capital, but into many aspects of London life. London tended to be excluded from the provisions of much of the reforming legislation of the nineteenth century. It alone was left out of the 1835 Corporations Act, and the 1848 Public Health Act. This second Act decreed that, where a registration district recorded a death rate of over 23 per 1,000, the undertaking of remedial measures and the appointment of a Medical Officer of Health (MOH) became compulsory. In certain parts of London, most notably the East End, a death rate of\",\"PeriodicalId\":448368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-02-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.001137\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hygiea Internationalis : An Interdisciplinary Journal for The History of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3384/HYGIEA.1403-8668.001137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在过去的二十年里,伦敦公共卫生史的特殊性一直是几项研究的主题,其中最著名的是安妮·哈迪、比尔·勒金、劳拉·马克斯、格雷厄姆·穆尼、约翰·戴维斯和大卫·欧文。这篇文章的目的不是增加经典,而是呼吁重新审视这一领域的一些原始来源,特别是幸存的大都会卫生医疗官员(MOHs)的报告,这些报告提供了独特的见解,不仅是对首都公共卫生政策和实践的发展,而且对伦敦生活的许多方面。伦敦倾向于被排除在19世纪许多改革立法的条款之外。1835年的《公司法》和1848年的《公共卫生法》唯独没有提到这一点。第二项法令规定,如果一个登记区记录的死亡率超过千分之23,则必须采取补救措施并任命一名卫生医务官员。在伦敦的某些地区,尤其是东区,死亡率为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scarlatina and Sewer Smells: Metropolitan Public Health Records 1855-1920
he peculiarities of the history of public health in London have been the subject of several studies in the last twenty years, most notably by Anne Hardy, Bill Luckin, Lara Marks, Graham Mooney, John Davies and David Owen. The purpose of this contribution is not to add to the canon, but rather to make a plea for a re-examination of some of the original sources for this field, in particular the surviving reports of the metropolitan Medical Officers of Health (MOHs), which provide a unique insight, not solely into the development of public health policy and practice in the capital, but into many aspects of London life. London tended to be excluded from the provisions of much of the reforming legislation of the nineteenth century. It alone was left out of the 1835 Corporations Act, and the 1848 Public Health Act. This second Act decreed that, where a registration district recorded a death rate of over 23 per 1,000, the undertaking of remedial measures and the appointment of a Medical Officer of Health (MOH) became compulsory. In certain parts of London, most notably the East End, a death rate of
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信