biomeed InTray®Colorex MRSA与BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™CHROMagar®MRSA II的比较评价

Kiran Bijlani, M. Gómez, Rowena D. Matias, A. Najafi, Ron Najafi, S. Arumugam
{"title":"biomeed InTray®Colorex MRSA与BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™CHROMagar®MRSA II的比较评价","authors":"Kiran Bijlani, M. Gómez, Rowena D. Matias, A. Najafi, Ron Najafi, S. Arumugam","doi":"10.4172/2161-0703.1000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most dangerous antibiotic resistant pathogens and a common cause of most health-care acquired infections. MRSA causes skin, wound and bloodstream infections that can cause sepsis and ultimately lead to death. CDC and WHO have listed MRSA as a serious threat infection and included in The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. Early, reliable, and accurate diagnosis of MRSA in a clinical setting is critical for the treatment and control of infection in hospitals and the community. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial diagnostic systems, Biomed InTray® Colorex and BDTM ESwab Regular Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar® (ESwab + CHROMagar®) to recover 51 MRSA clinical isolates. The percentage recovery of MRSA clinical isolates in InTray® and in ESwab + CHROMagar® was 99% and 75%, respectively. Our findings suggest that InTray® was more efficient than ESwab + CHROMagar® in recovering MRSA clinical isolates.","PeriodicalId":269971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Biomed InTray ® Colorex MRSA with BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar ® MRSA II\",\"authors\":\"Kiran Bijlani, M. Gómez, Rowena D. Matias, A. Najafi, Ron Najafi, S. Arumugam\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2161-0703.1000273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most dangerous antibiotic resistant pathogens and a common cause of most health-care acquired infections. MRSA causes skin, wound and bloodstream infections that can cause sepsis and ultimately lead to death. CDC and WHO have listed MRSA as a serious threat infection and included in The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. Early, reliable, and accurate diagnosis of MRSA in a clinical setting is critical for the treatment and control of infection in hospitals and the community. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial diagnostic systems, Biomed InTray® Colorex and BDTM ESwab Regular Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar® (ESwab + CHROMagar®) to recover 51 MRSA clinical isolates. The percentage recovery of MRSA clinical isolates in InTray® and in ESwab + CHROMagar® was 99% and 75%, respectively. Our findings suggest that InTray® was more efficient than ESwab + CHROMagar® in recovering MRSA clinical isolates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":269971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是最危险的抗生素耐药病原体之一,也是大多数卫生保健获得性感染的常见原因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起皮肤、伤口和血液感染,可导致败血症并最终导致死亡。美国疾病控制与预防中心和世界卫生组织已将MRSA列为一种严重的威胁感染,并列入《抗击耐药细菌国家行动计划》。在临床环境中,MRSA的早期、可靠和准确诊断对于医院和社区感染的治疗和控制至关重要。我们比较评估了两种商用诊断系统,Biomed InTray®Colorex和BDTM ESwab常规采集试剂盒/ BBL™CHROMagar®(ESwab + CHROMagar®)对51个MRSA临床分离物的疗效。MRSA临床分离株在InTray®和ESwab + CHROMagar®中的回收率分别为99%和75%。我们的研究结果表明,在回收MRSA临床分离株方面,InTray®比ESwab + CHROMagar®更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Evaluation of Biomed InTray ® Colorex MRSA with BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar ® MRSA II
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most dangerous antibiotic resistant pathogens and a common cause of most health-care acquired infections. MRSA causes skin, wound and bloodstream infections that can cause sepsis and ultimately lead to death. CDC and WHO have listed MRSA as a serious threat infection and included in The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. Early, reliable, and accurate diagnosis of MRSA in a clinical setting is critical for the treatment and control of infection in hospitals and the community. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial diagnostic systems, Biomed InTray® Colorex and BDTM ESwab Regular Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar® (ESwab + CHROMagar®) to recover 51 MRSA clinical isolates. The percentage recovery of MRSA clinical isolates in InTray® and in ESwab + CHROMagar® was 99% and 75%, respectively. Our findings suggest that InTray® was more efficient than ESwab + CHROMagar® in recovering MRSA clinical isolates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信