{"title":"低应力硅碳液体封装剂的研制","authors":"D. L. Robinson, R. Brady, I. M. Higgins","doi":"10.1109/ECTC.1993.346762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mismatches in thermal expansion between encapsulant, die and substrate lead to stresses that can cause failures in thermal cycling of electronic parts. These stresses become especially troublesome as die size increases. In order to minimize failures, low stress encapsulants are needed. This paper describes development of a low stress silicon-carbon liquid encapsulant. Development was done on multichip modules (MCM-L) with large die. In order to develop a low stress encapsulant, a designed experiment was run. Variables in the full factorial design included: (1) encapsulant filler level, (2) encapsulant elastomer type, (3) encapsulant elastomer level, (4) board thickness, and (5) cure schedule. The material variables (1-3) gave rise to 8 formulations with widely varying properties, such as CTE and modulus. Air to air thermal cycling (-55/spl deg/C to +125/spl deg/C) was performed on MCM-L test boards with encapsulated 7.62 mm/spl times/19.05 mm (300 mil/spl times/750 mil) die. Parts were tested in situ throughout the cycling up to 2000 cycles. Results of the designed experiment indicated that filler level was the dominant variable, with high filler level providing the most reliability. Several other variables perhaps had minor effects. Continuing work is examining filler content, elastomer content, and dispensability further.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":281423,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of IEEE 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC '93)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a low stress silicon-carbon liquid encapsulant\",\"authors\":\"D. L. Robinson, R. Brady, I. M. Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ECTC.1993.346762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mismatches in thermal expansion between encapsulant, die and substrate lead to stresses that can cause failures in thermal cycling of electronic parts. These stresses become especially troublesome as die size increases. In order to minimize failures, low stress encapsulants are needed. This paper describes development of a low stress silicon-carbon liquid encapsulant. Development was done on multichip modules (MCM-L) with large die. In order to develop a low stress encapsulant, a designed experiment was run. Variables in the full factorial design included: (1) encapsulant filler level, (2) encapsulant elastomer type, (3) encapsulant elastomer level, (4) board thickness, and (5) cure schedule. The material variables (1-3) gave rise to 8 formulations with widely varying properties, such as CTE and modulus. Air to air thermal cycling (-55/spl deg/C to +125/spl deg/C) was performed on MCM-L test boards with encapsulated 7.62 mm/spl times/19.05 mm (300 mil/spl times/750 mil) die. Parts were tested in situ throughout the cycling up to 2000 cycles. Results of the designed experiment indicated that filler level was the dominant variable, with high filler level providing the most reliability. Several other variables perhaps had minor effects. Continuing work is examining filler content, elastomer content, and dispensability further.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":281423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of IEEE 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC '93)\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of IEEE 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC '93)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.1993.346762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of IEEE 43rd Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC '93)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC.1993.346762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
封装剂、模具和衬底之间的热膨胀不匹配会导致应力,从而导致电子部件的热循环失效。随着模具尺寸的增加,这些应力变得特别麻烦。为了尽量减少故障,需要使用低应力密封剂。本文介绍了一种低应力硅碳液体封装剂的研制。在大芯片的多芯片模块(MCM-L)上进行开发。为研制低应力密封胶,进行了设计试验。全因子设计中的变量包括:(1)密封剂填充水平,(2)密封剂弹性体类型,(3)密封剂弹性体水平,(4)板厚度,(5)固化时间表。材料变量(1-3)产生了8种具有广泛不同性能的配方,如CTE和模量。在MCM-L测试板上进行空气对空气热循环(-55/spl℃至+125/spl℃),该测试板采用封装的7.62 mm/spl倍/19.05 mm (300 mil/spl倍/750 mil)模具。零件在整个循环过程中进行了多达2000次的原位测试。设计试验结果表明,填料水平是主导变量,填料水平越高,可靠性越高。其他几个变量可能有轻微的影响。继续进行的工作是进一步检查填料含量、弹性体含量和可有可无。
Development of a low stress silicon-carbon liquid encapsulant
Mismatches in thermal expansion between encapsulant, die and substrate lead to stresses that can cause failures in thermal cycling of electronic parts. These stresses become especially troublesome as die size increases. In order to minimize failures, low stress encapsulants are needed. This paper describes development of a low stress silicon-carbon liquid encapsulant. Development was done on multichip modules (MCM-L) with large die. In order to develop a low stress encapsulant, a designed experiment was run. Variables in the full factorial design included: (1) encapsulant filler level, (2) encapsulant elastomer type, (3) encapsulant elastomer level, (4) board thickness, and (5) cure schedule. The material variables (1-3) gave rise to 8 formulations with widely varying properties, such as CTE and modulus. Air to air thermal cycling (-55/spl deg/C to +125/spl deg/C) was performed on MCM-L test boards with encapsulated 7.62 mm/spl times/19.05 mm (300 mil/spl times/750 mil) die. Parts were tested in situ throughout the cycling up to 2000 cycles. Results of the designed experiment indicated that filler level was the dominant variable, with high filler level providing the most reliability. Several other variables perhaps had minor effects. Continuing work is examining filler content, elastomer content, and dispensability further.<>