对比增强的视神经鞘直径超声成像-概念研究的证明

A. Bergauer, G. Prosen, N. Kobilica, V. Flis, M. Jevšek, T. Šeruga
{"title":"对比增强的视神经鞘直径超声成像-概念研究的证明","authors":"A. Bergauer, G. Prosen, N. Kobilica, V. Flis, M. Jevšek, T. Šeruga","doi":"10.18690/actabiomed.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The present proof of concept study was performed to evaluate the consistency between measurements of the optic nerve sheath taken using contrast– enhanced sonography and high– resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main goal was to devise a novel candidate method to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter that is easy to perform, straightforward to interpret, and highly reproducible. \nMethods: The approval of the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia was obtained; the study was registered under No. 30/03/12. Nine healthy young adults were examined with high–resolution MRI and contrast–enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter were performed 3 mm behind the bulb, using both methods. The datasets were anonymized and the readers, blinded. Statistical analysis included evaluation of agreement using Bland–Altman plots. The assessment of inter– rater reliability was achieved by calculation of the intra class correlation coefficient. \nResults: Bland–Altman plots showed favorable overall agreement between both methods, with clinically acceptable limits of agreement. The intra class correlation coefficient calculated for both methods suggests that the CEUS method was at least as reproducible as high–resolution MRI. \nConclusion: The described method, using CEUS to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter, facilitates the identification of the surrounding anatomy. When CEUS is employed, the measurement points can be easily and reliably set, and retro bulbar artifacts are less confounding. Based on results from a relatively small sample, this method seems to be comparable with high–resolution MRI. Evaluation of the method on a larger sample of healthy subjects and patients with increased intracranial pressure is needed.","PeriodicalId":186880,"journal":{"name":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contrast–enhanced ultrasound imaging of the optic nerve sheath diameter – a proof of concept study\",\"authors\":\"A. Bergauer, G. Prosen, N. Kobilica, V. Flis, M. Jevšek, T. Šeruga\",\"doi\":\"10.18690/actabiomed.151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The present proof of concept study was performed to evaluate the consistency between measurements of the optic nerve sheath taken using contrast– enhanced sonography and high– resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main goal was to devise a novel candidate method to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter that is easy to perform, straightforward to interpret, and highly reproducible. \\nMethods: The approval of the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia was obtained; the study was registered under No. 30/03/12. Nine healthy young adults were examined with high–resolution MRI and contrast–enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter were performed 3 mm behind the bulb, using both methods. The datasets were anonymized and the readers, blinded. Statistical analysis included evaluation of agreement using Bland–Altman plots. The assessment of inter– rater reliability was achieved by calculation of the intra class correlation coefficient. \\nResults: Bland–Altman plots showed favorable overall agreement between both methods, with clinically acceptable limits of agreement. The intra class correlation coefficient calculated for both methods suggests that the CEUS method was at least as reproducible as high–resolution MRI. \\nConclusion: The described method, using CEUS to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter, facilitates the identification of the surrounding anatomy. When CEUS is employed, the measurement points can be easily and reliably set, and retro bulbar artifacts are less confounding. Based on results from a relatively small sample, this method seems to be comparable with high–resolution MRI. Evaluation of the method on a larger sample of healthy subjects and patients with increased intracranial pressure is needed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Medico-Biotechnica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Medico-Biotechnica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18690/actabiomed.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的概念验证研究是为了评估使用对比增强超声和高分辨率磁共振成像(MRI)测量视神经鞘的一致性。主要目标是设计一种新的候选方法来测量视神经鞘直径,该方法易于执行,直接解释,并且高度可重复性。方法:获得斯洛文尼亚共和国国家医学伦理委员会批准;该研究注册号为30/03/12。采用高分辨率MRI和超声造影(CEUS)对9名健康年轻人进行了检查。使用两种方法测量视神经鞘直径在球后3mm处进行。数据集是匿名的,读者是盲的。统计分析包括使用Bland-Altman图评估一致性。通过计算类内相关系数,实现了类间信度的评估。结果:Bland-Altman图显示了两种方法之间良好的总体一致性,具有临床可接受的一致性范围。两种方法计算的类内相关系数表明,超声造影方法的可重复性至少与高分辨率MRI相同。结论:采用超声造影测量视神经鞘直径的方法,便于识别周围解剖结构。当使用CEUS时,测量点可以轻松可靠地设置,并且复古球伪影较少混淆。基于相对小样本的结果,这种方法似乎可以与高分辨率MRI相媲美。需要在更大的健康受试者和颅内压升高的患者样本上对该方法进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contrast–enhanced ultrasound imaging of the optic nerve sheath diameter – a proof of concept study
Purpose: The present proof of concept study was performed to evaluate the consistency between measurements of the optic nerve sheath taken using contrast– enhanced sonography and high– resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main goal was to devise a novel candidate method to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter that is easy to perform, straightforward to interpret, and highly reproducible. Methods: The approval of the National Medical Ethics Committee of the Republic of Slovenia was obtained; the study was registered under No. 30/03/12. Nine healthy young adults were examined with high–resolution MRI and contrast–enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Measurements of the optic nerve sheath diameter were performed 3 mm behind the bulb, using both methods. The datasets were anonymized and the readers, blinded. Statistical analysis included evaluation of agreement using Bland–Altman plots. The assessment of inter– rater reliability was achieved by calculation of the intra class correlation coefficient. Results: Bland–Altman plots showed favorable overall agreement between both methods, with clinically acceptable limits of agreement. The intra class correlation coefficient calculated for both methods suggests that the CEUS method was at least as reproducible as high–resolution MRI. Conclusion: The described method, using CEUS to measure the optic nerve sheath diameter, facilitates the identification of the surrounding anatomy. When CEUS is employed, the measurement points can be easily and reliably set, and retro bulbar artifacts are less confounding. Based on results from a relatively small sample, this method seems to be comparable with high–resolution MRI. Evaluation of the method on a larger sample of healthy subjects and patients with increased intracranial pressure is needed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信