Ai是下一个Gpt:政治经济视角

M. Trajtenberg
{"title":"Ai是下一个Gpt:政治经济视角","authors":"M. Trajtenberg","doi":"10.3386/W24245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"History suggests that dismal prophecies regarding the impact of great technological advances rarely come to pass. Yet, as many occupations will indeed vanish with the advent of AI as the new General Purpose Technology (GPT), we should search for ways to ameliorate the detrimental effects of AI, and enhance its positive ones, particularly in: (1) education and skills development: need to move away from the centuries-old \"factory model\" of education, and develop instead skills relevant for an AI-based economy – analytical, creative, interpersonal, and emotional. (2) The professionalization of personal care occupations, particularly in healthcare and education; these are to provide the bulk of future employment growth, yet as performed today involve little training and technology, and confer low wages. New, higher standards and academic requirements should be set for these occupations, which would enable AI to benefit both providers and users. (3) Affect the direction of technical advance – we distinguish between \"human-enhancing innovations\" (HEI), that magnify and enhance sensory, motoric, and other such human capabilities, and \"human-replacing innovations\" (HRI), which replace human intervention, and often leave for humans mostly \"dumb\" jobs. AI-based HEI's have the potential to unleash a new wave of creativity and productivity, particularly in services, whereas HRI's might just decrease employment and give rise to unworthy jobs.","PeriodicalId":199971,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Technology & Ethics (Sub-Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"105","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ai as the Next Gpt: A Political-Economy Perspective\",\"authors\":\"M. Trajtenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3386/W24245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"History suggests that dismal prophecies regarding the impact of great technological advances rarely come to pass. Yet, as many occupations will indeed vanish with the advent of AI as the new General Purpose Technology (GPT), we should search for ways to ameliorate the detrimental effects of AI, and enhance its positive ones, particularly in: (1) education and skills development: need to move away from the centuries-old \\\"factory model\\\" of education, and develop instead skills relevant for an AI-based economy – analytical, creative, interpersonal, and emotional. (2) The professionalization of personal care occupations, particularly in healthcare and education; these are to provide the bulk of future employment growth, yet as performed today involve little training and technology, and confer low wages. New, higher standards and academic requirements should be set for these occupations, which would enable AI to benefit both providers and users. (3) Affect the direction of technical advance – we distinguish between \\\"human-enhancing innovations\\\" (HEI), that magnify and enhance sensory, motoric, and other such human capabilities, and \\\"human-replacing innovations\\\" (HRI), which replace human intervention, and often leave for humans mostly \\\"dumb\\\" jobs. AI-based HEI's have the potential to unleash a new wave of creativity and productivity, particularly in services, whereas HRI's might just decrease employment and give rise to unworthy jobs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PRN: Technology & Ethics (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"105\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PRN: Technology & Ethics (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3386/W24245\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Technology & Ethics (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/W24245","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 105

摘要

历史表明,关于重大技术进步影响的悲观预言很少会成为现实。然而,随着人工智能作为新的通用技术(GPT)的出现,许多职业确实会消失,我们应该寻找方法来改善人工智能的有害影响,并增强其积极影响,特别是在以下方面:1)教育和技能发展:需要摆脱几个世纪以来的教育“工厂模式”,转而发展与人工智能经济相关的技能——分析能力、创造力、人际关系和情感能力。(2)个人护理职业的专业化,特别是在医疗保健和教育方面;这些将为未来的就业增长提供大部分,但目前的做法涉及的培训和技术很少,工资也很低。应该为这些职业设定新的、更高的标准和学术要求,这将使人工智能对提供者和用户都有利。(3)影响技术进步的方向——我们区分“增强人类的创新”(HEI)和“替代人类的创新”(HRI),前者放大和增强了人类的感官、运动和其他类似的能力,后者取代了人类的干预,通常把大多数“愚蠢”的工作留给人类。基于人工智能的高等教育有可能释放出新的创造力和生产力浪潮,尤其是在服务业,而人力资源研究所可能只会减少就业,并产生不值得的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ai as the Next Gpt: A Political-Economy Perspective
History suggests that dismal prophecies regarding the impact of great technological advances rarely come to pass. Yet, as many occupations will indeed vanish with the advent of AI as the new General Purpose Technology (GPT), we should search for ways to ameliorate the detrimental effects of AI, and enhance its positive ones, particularly in: (1) education and skills development: need to move away from the centuries-old "factory model" of education, and develop instead skills relevant for an AI-based economy – analytical, creative, interpersonal, and emotional. (2) The professionalization of personal care occupations, particularly in healthcare and education; these are to provide the bulk of future employment growth, yet as performed today involve little training and technology, and confer low wages. New, higher standards and academic requirements should be set for these occupations, which would enable AI to benefit both providers and users. (3) Affect the direction of technical advance – we distinguish between "human-enhancing innovations" (HEI), that magnify and enhance sensory, motoric, and other such human capabilities, and "human-replacing innovations" (HRI), which replace human intervention, and often leave for humans mostly "dumb" jobs. AI-based HEI's have the potential to unleash a new wave of creativity and productivity, particularly in services, whereas HRI's might just decrease employment and give rise to unworthy jobs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信