资助非自由民主:欧盟可信预算条件的理由

Renáta Uitz
{"title":"资助非自由民主:欧盟可信预算条件的理由","authors":"Renáta Uitz","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3722936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues that without conditioning access to EU funds on respect for the founding values in a credible manner the EU runs the risk of funding many more illiberal governments in the years to come. It explores the literature on the impact of EU financial assistance on domestic politics to argue for budgetary conditionality. The paper also argues for measures of sound financial management to counter the risks of illiberal governmental practices, proposing to draw on existing anti-fraud methods in order to counter oligarchic-clientelistic practices in the member states.","PeriodicalId":246606,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Economic & Political Integration (Topic)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Funding Illiberal Democracy: The Case for Credible Budgetary Conditionality in the EU\",\"authors\":\"Renáta Uitz\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3722936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues that without conditioning access to EU funds on respect for the founding values in a credible manner the EU runs the risk of funding many more illiberal governments in the years to come. It explores the literature on the impact of EU financial assistance on domestic politics to argue for budgetary conditionality. The paper also argues for measures of sound financial management to counter the risks of illiberal governmental practices, proposing to draw on existing anti-fraud methods in order to counter oligarchic-clientelistic practices in the member states.\",\"PeriodicalId\":246606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Economic & Political Integration (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Economic & Political Integration (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722936\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Economic & Political Integration (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3722936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为,如果不能以可信的方式尊重创始价值观作为获得欧盟资金的条件,欧盟在未来几年将面临为更多不自由政府提供资金的风险。它探讨了关于欧盟财政援助对国内政治影响的文献,以支持预算条件。本文还主张采取健全的财务管理措施,以对抗不自由的政府行为的风险,建议利用现有的反欺诈方法,以对抗成员国的寡头庇护主义行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Funding Illiberal Democracy: The Case for Credible Budgetary Conditionality in the EU
This paper argues that without conditioning access to EU funds on respect for the founding values in a credible manner the EU runs the risk of funding many more illiberal governments in the years to come. It explores the literature on the impact of EU financial assistance on domestic politics to argue for budgetary conditionality. The paper also argues for measures of sound financial management to counter the risks of illiberal governmental practices, proposing to draw on existing anti-fraud methods in order to counter oligarchic-clientelistic practices in the member states.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信