{"title":"II型和III型锁相环之间的性能权衡","authors":"M. Ugarte, A. Carlosena","doi":"10.1109/SSD.2014.6808839","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Practical designs of Type III PLL are scarce, and even they have been sometimes considered impossible. In this paper we present for the first time a performance comparison between Type II and Type III PLLs. The analysis is based on a powerful model previously presented by the authors. In particular the advantages of type III PLLs over type II to follow chirp signals, without compromising stability, are demonstrated. Approximated closed form expressions are proposed to evaluate Type III PLL performance.","PeriodicalId":168063,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance trade-offs between Type II and Type III PLLs\",\"authors\":\"M. Ugarte, A. Carlosena\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SSD.2014.6808839\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Practical designs of Type III PLL are scarce, and even they have been sometimes considered impossible. In this paper we present for the first time a performance comparison between Type II and Type III PLLs. The analysis is based on a powerful model previously presented by the authors. In particular the advantages of type III PLLs over type II to follow chirp signals, without compromising stability, are demonstrated. Approximated closed form expressions are proposed to evaluate Type III PLL performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2014.6808839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 11th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD14)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2014.6808839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance trade-offs between Type II and Type III PLLs
Practical designs of Type III PLL are scarce, and even they have been sometimes considered impossible. In this paper we present for the first time a performance comparison between Type II and Type III PLLs. The analysis is based on a powerful model previously presented by the authors. In particular the advantages of type III PLLs over type II to follow chirp signals, without compromising stability, are demonstrated. Approximated closed form expressions are proposed to evaluate Type III PLL performance.