弹性作为抵抗社会排斥的一种方式:比较案例分析

Cristóbal Ruiz-Román, I. Calderón-Almendros, Jesús Juárez Pérez-Cea
{"title":"弹性作为抵抗社会排斥的一种方式:比较案例分析","authors":"Cristóbal Ruiz-Román, I. Calderón-Almendros, Jesús Juárez Pérez-Cea","doi":"10.7179/PSRI_2017.29.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The stigmatisation of some marginalised groups is a common, cross-cutting form of social exclusion. However, just as there are some common forms of exclusion among discriminated groups, certain strategies of resilience in the face of social exclusion are also shared by different groups within their various social contexts. This paper is based on a comparative analysis of three case studies of individuals who have experienced processes of resilience when faced with stigmatisation and social exclusion. One is a person who emigrated from an impoverished country to Spain; another, a person with an intellectual disability; and the third is a person of gypsy origin living in a marginalised neighbourhood. In the first phase, in-depth interviews and focus groups were used to collect data for each of the three case studies. The data from each of them were then analysed by using their own emerging system of categories. In the second phase, common categories within all three case studies were identified. This was effected by using a similarity-based comparative analysis of cases. We were therefore able to see that there were some categories common to the three case studies, namely stigmatism and dehumanisation; suffering and pain as driving forces behind the struggle; resilience and empowerment, and socio-educational help. These shape what we term resilient dynamics or processes generated by people and their environments, and provide interesting synergies and resistance to social exclusion.","PeriodicalId":168546,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogía Social: Revista Interuniversitaria","volume":"25 3-4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La resiliencia como forma de resistir a la exclusión social: un análisis comparativo de casos\",\"authors\":\"Cristóbal Ruiz-Román, I. Calderón-Almendros, Jesús Juárez Pérez-Cea\",\"doi\":\"10.7179/PSRI_2017.29.09\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The stigmatisation of some marginalised groups is a common, cross-cutting form of social exclusion. However, just as there are some common forms of exclusion among discriminated groups, certain strategies of resilience in the face of social exclusion are also shared by different groups within their various social contexts. This paper is based on a comparative analysis of three case studies of individuals who have experienced processes of resilience when faced with stigmatisation and social exclusion. One is a person who emigrated from an impoverished country to Spain; another, a person with an intellectual disability; and the third is a person of gypsy origin living in a marginalised neighbourhood. In the first phase, in-depth interviews and focus groups were used to collect data for each of the three case studies. The data from each of them were then analysed by using their own emerging system of categories. In the second phase, common categories within all three case studies were identified. This was effected by using a similarity-based comparative analysis of cases. We were therefore able to see that there were some categories common to the three case studies, namely stigmatism and dehumanisation; suffering and pain as driving forces behind the struggle; resilience and empowerment, and socio-educational help. These shape what we term resilient dynamics or processes generated by people and their environments, and provide interesting synergies and resistance to social exclusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":168546,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogía Social: Revista Interuniversitaria\",\"volume\":\"25 3-4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogía Social: Revista Interuniversitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2017.29.09\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogía Social: Revista Interuniversitaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7179/PSRI_2017.29.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

对某些边缘群体的污名化是一种常见的、跨领域的社会排斥形式。然而,正如在受歧视群体中存在一些共同的排斥形式一样,面对社会排斥,不同群体在不同的社会背景下也有一些共同的恢复策略。本文基于三个案例研究的比较分析,这些案例研究的个体在面对污名化和社会排斥时经历了恢复过程。一个人从一个贫穷的国家移民到西班牙;另一种是智障人士;第三个是生活在边缘化社区的吉普赛人。在第一阶段,我们使用深度访谈和焦点小组来收集三个案例研究的数据。然后,通过使用各自新兴的分类系统,对来自每个国家的数据进行分析。在第二阶段,确定了所有三个案例研究中的共同类别。这是通过使用基于相似性的案例比较分析实现的。因此,我们能够看到这三个案例研究有一些共同的类别,即污名化和非人化;苦难和痛苦作为斗争的动力;复原力和赋权,以及社会教育帮助。这些形成了我们所说的弹性动力或由人及其环境产生的过程,并提供了有趣的协同作用和对社会排斥的抵抗力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La resiliencia como forma de resistir a la exclusión social: un análisis comparativo de casos
The stigmatisation of some marginalised groups is a common, cross-cutting form of social exclusion. However, just as there are some common forms of exclusion among discriminated groups, certain strategies of resilience in the face of social exclusion are also shared by different groups within their various social contexts. This paper is based on a comparative analysis of three case studies of individuals who have experienced processes of resilience when faced with stigmatisation and social exclusion. One is a person who emigrated from an impoverished country to Spain; another, a person with an intellectual disability; and the third is a person of gypsy origin living in a marginalised neighbourhood. In the first phase, in-depth interviews and focus groups were used to collect data for each of the three case studies. The data from each of them were then analysed by using their own emerging system of categories. In the second phase, common categories within all three case studies were identified. This was effected by using a similarity-based comparative analysis of cases. We were therefore able to see that there were some categories common to the three case studies, namely stigmatism and dehumanisation; suffering and pain as driving forces behind the struggle; resilience and empowerment, and socio-educational help. These shape what we term resilient dynamics or processes generated by people and their environments, and provide interesting synergies and resistance to social exclusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信