压力下的联邦制

N. Steytler
{"title":"压力下的联邦制","authors":"N. Steytler","doi":"10.4324/9781003166771-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter poses three questions: first, how did the federal systems under review respond to the pandemic - what were the modalities of the response and their effect on centralisation or decentralisation processes? Secondly, how well (or badly) did the federal systems fare in combating the pandemic? Were the systems robust enough to cope with the challenge? Thirdly, will the manner in which the systems responded - the changes brought about to federal dynamics - have a lasting impact? The 19 case studies show that most federal systems became more centralised in response to the pandemic, but not uniformly or continuously so. Intergovernmental relations were often inadequate or non-existent. The increased dependence of subnational governments on federal transfers also had a centralising effect. Some federations were resilient enough to deal effectively with the pandemic, but in many other failures occurred in their federal system, leading to poor outcomes. Finally, Covid-19 might be a catalyst in some countries for greater decentralisation, particularly in the field of fiscal federalism. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.","PeriodicalId":130880,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federalism under Pressure\",\"authors\":\"N. Steytler\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003166771-28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter poses three questions: first, how did the federal systems under review respond to the pandemic - what were the modalities of the response and their effect on centralisation or decentralisation processes? Secondly, how well (or badly) did the federal systems fare in combating the pandemic? Were the systems robust enough to cope with the challenge? Thirdly, will the manner in which the systems responded - the changes brought about to federal dynamics - have a lasting impact? The 19 case studies show that most federal systems became more centralised in response to the pandemic, but not uniformly or continuously so. Intergovernmental relations were often inadequate or non-existent. The increased dependence of subnational governments on federal transfers also had a centralising effect. Some federations were resilient enough to deal effectively with the pandemic, but in many other failures occurred in their federal system, leading to poor outcomes. Finally, Covid-19 might be a catalyst in some countries for greater decentralisation, particularly in the field of fiscal federalism. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Federalism and Covid-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003166771-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章提出了三个问题:第一,所审查的联邦制度是如何应对大流行的——应对的方式是什么,以及它们对集中或分散进程的影响是什么?其次,联邦系统在抗击疫情方面做得有多好(或多差)?这些系统是否足够强大,能够应对这一挑战?第三,各系统作出反应的方式- -联邦动态的变化- -会产生持久的影响吗?19个案例研究表明,大多数联邦系统在应对大流行方面变得更加集中,但不是统一或持续的。政府间关系往往不充分或根本不存在。地方政府对联邦财政转移的日益依赖也产生了中央集权效应。一些联邦有足够的弹性,可以有效地应对大流行,但在许多其他联邦系统中发生了失败,导致结果不佳。最后,2019冠状病毒病可能成为一些国家进一步下放权力的催化剂,特别是在财政联邦制领域。©2022选择和编辑事项,Nico Steytler。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Federalism under Pressure
This chapter poses three questions: first, how did the federal systems under review respond to the pandemic - what were the modalities of the response and their effect on centralisation or decentralisation processes? Secondly, how well (or badly) did the federal systems fare in combating the pandemic? Were the systems robust enough to cope with the challenge? Thirdly, will the manner in which the systems responded - the changes brought about to federal dynamics - have a lasting impact? The 19 case studies show that most federal systems became more centralised in response to the pandemic, but not uniformly or continuously so. Intergovernmental relations were often inadequate or non-existent. The increased dependence of subnational governments on federal transfers also had a centralising effect. Some federations were resilient enough to deal effectively with the pandemic, but in many other failures occurred in their federal system, leading to poor outcomes. Finally, Covid-19 might be a catalyst in some countries for greater decentralisation, particularly in the field of fiscal federalism. © 2022 selection and editorial matter, Nico Steytler.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信