{"title":"特发性炎性点状狭窄治疗方案荟萃分析","authors":"Ahmed Seif, O. Said, M. Diab","doi":"10.21608/fumj.2023.307851","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Punctal obstruction is the narrowing or complete blocking of the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus. Acquired punctal obstruction with profuse epiphora is a rather common illness, with a prevalence ranging from 8.3% to 54.3%. Aim of the study: Aim of the study: To perform a meta-analysis on the management options for idiopathic inflammatory pyloric stenosis. Subjects and Methods: This meta-analysis follows the PRISMA flow diagram. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and local databases for relevant clinical trials evaluating the management of idiopathic inflammatory punctal stenosis. The analysis was performed using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, in addition to the 95% confidence interval (CI). The data were considered homogenous if the I2 was 50% and heterogenous if the I2 was > 50%. Results: Results showed significantly improved punctal staging in groups (I) and (III) compared to baseline, ( P = 0.007 and 0.017, respectively). However, no significant improvement was observed in group II. The relative risk (RR) across all groups was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.75, P = 0.04 ), indicating a significant improvement in the treatment at the assessment time. The analysis of individual stages showed that the treatment effect varied across stages, with a significant improvement observed in stage 3. The study also found a substantial increase in Outer Punctal Diameter (OPD) in the groups (I) and (III) immediately after the treatment compared to baseline, with a pooled effect size of -58.22 (95% CI: -108.50, -7.93, P = 0.02 ). Conclusions: Dexamethasone (0.1% non-preserved, 0.4% non-preserved) showed an effective, symptom-relieving, and outer punctal diameter (OPD) improvement as compared with the 0.1% preserved dexamethasone; on the other hand, the 0.4% non-preserved dexamethasone carried more risk of increasing the intra-ocular pressure (IOP).","PeriodicalId":436341,"journal":{"name":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-analysis on the management options of Idiopathic Inflammatory Punctal Stenosis\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Seif, O. Said, M. Diab\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/fumj.2023.307851\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Punctal obstruction is the narrowing or complete blocking of the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus. Acquired punctal obstruction with profuse epiphora is a rather common illness, with a prevalence ranging from 8.3% to 54.3%. Aim of the study: Aim of the study: To perform a meta-analysis on the management options for idiopathic inflammatory pyloric stenosis. Subjects and Methods: This meta-analysis follows the PRISMA flow diagram. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and local databases for relevant clinical trials evaluating the management of idiopathic inflammatory punctal stenosis. The analysis was performed using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, in addition to the 95% confidence interval (CI). The data were considered homogenous if the I2 was 50% and heterogenous if the I2 was > 50%. Results: Results showed significantly improved punctal staging in groups (I) and (III) compared to baseline, ( P = 0.007 and 0.017, respectively). However, no significant improvement was observed in group II. The relative risk (RR) across all groups was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.75, P = 0.04 ), indicating a significant improvement in the treatment at the assessment time. The analysis of individual stages showed that the treatment effect varied across stages, with a significant improvement observed in stage 3. The study also found a substantial increase in Outer Punctal Diameter (OPD) in the groups (I) and (III) immediately after the treatment compared to baseline, with a pooled effect size of -58.22 (95% CI: -108.50, -7.93, P = 0.02 ). Conclusions: Dexamethasone (0.1% non-preserved, 0.4% non-preserved) showed an effective, symptom-relieving, and outer punctal diameter (OPD) improvement as compared with the 0.1% preserved dexamethasone; on the other hand, the 0.4% non-preserved dexamethasone carried more risk of increasing the intra-ocular pressure (IOP).\",\"PeriodicalId\":436341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fayoum University Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fayoum University Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2023.307851\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fayoum University Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/fumj.2023.307851","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
点状梗阻是泪小管外部开口狭窄或完全阻塞。获得性点状梗阻伴大量上显是一种相当常见的疾病,患病率为8.3%至54.3%。研究目的:研究目的:对特发性炎性幽门狭窄的治疗方案进行荟萃分析。对象和方法:本meta分析遵循PRISMA流程图。我们检索了PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase和当地数据库,以评估特发性炎症性点状狭窄管理的相关临床试验。除95%置信区间(CI)外,还使用二分数据的风险比(RR)和连续数据的平均差(MD)进行分析。如果I2为50%,则认为数据是同质的;如果I2为> 50%,则认为数据是异质的。结果:与基线相比,(I)组和(III)组患者的时间分期明显改善(P分别为0.007和0.017)。然而,在第二组没有观察到明显的改善。各组的相对危险度(RR)为1.68 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.75, P = 0.04),表明在评估时治疗有显著改善。对各个阶段的分析表明,不同阶段的治疗效果不同,在第3阶段观察到显著的改善。该研究还发现,与基线相比,治疗后(I)组和(III)组的外点状直径(OPD)大幅增加,合并效应值为-58.22 (95% CI: -108.50, -7.93, P = 0.02)。结论:与0.1%未保存的地塞米松相比,0.1%未保存的地塞米松(0.4%未保存的地塞米松)表现出有效、缓解症状和改善外点状直径(OPD)的效果;另一方面,0.4%的非保存地塞米松增加眼压(IOP)的风险更大。
A Meta-analysis on the management options of Idiopathic Inflammatory Punctal Stenosis
Introduction: Punctal obstruction is the narrowing or complete blocking of the external opening of the lacrimal canaliculus. Acquired punctal obstruction with profuse epiphora is a rather common illness, with a prevalence ranging from 8.3% to 54.3%. Aim of the study: Aim of the study: To perform a meta-analysis on the management options for idiopathic inflammatory pyloric stenosis. Subjects and Methods: This meta-analysis follows the PRISMA flow diagram. We searched PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Embase, and local databases for relevant clinical trials evaluating the management of idiopathic inflammatory punctal stenosis. The analysis was performed using the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data and the mean difference (MD) for continuous data, in addition to the 95% confidence interval (CI). The data were considered homogenous if the I2 was 50% and heterogenous if the I2 was > 50%. Results: Results showed significantly improved punctal staging in groups (I) and (III) compared to baseline, ( P = 0.007 and 0.017, respectively). However, no significant improvement was observed in group II. The relative risk (RR) across all groups was 1.68 (95% CI: 1.03, 2.75, P = 0.04 ), indicating a significant improvement in the treatment at the assessment time. The analysis of individual stages showed that the treatment effect varied across stages, with a significant improvement observed in stage 3. The study also found a substantial increase in Outer Punctal Diameter (OPD) in the groups (I) and (III) immediately after the treatment compared to baseline, with a pooled effect size of -58.22 (95% CI: -108.50, -7.93, P = 0.02 ). Conclusions: Dexamethasone (0.1% non-preserved, 0.4% non-preserved) showed an effective, symptom-relieving, and outer punctal diameter (OPD) improvement as compared with the 0.1% preserved dexamethasone; on the other hand, the 0.4% non-preserved dexamethasone carried more risk of increasing the intra-ocular pressure (IOP).