韩国与美国人才管理的困境与差距

Hyun Mi Park
{"title":"韩国与美国人才管理的困境与差距","authors":"Hyun Mi Park","doi":"10.1504/ijexportm.2020.10032007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Talent management (TM) has attracted significant interest in the management field and it evolved as a North American paradigm and research tradition. Given TM has been mainly researched by Western scholars, commentators have urged that there should be a shift away from Western-centred TM to a focus on broader, more diverse contexts in order to understand the nature of TM in more depth. However, the challenges involved in the transfer of HR practices from one country to another leads to failure to implement effective TM. Based on a robust structured literature analysis, this paper highlights the key dilemmas when emerging countries adopt Western-origin TM practices because of different national contexts including economic growth rate and organisational cultures. This research contributes to the literature on TM in emerging non-Western countries by providing four research propositions. First, adopting TM may not be the best strategy for emerging countries when its economic scale and growth are not large enough to pursue TM practices. Second, there could be a high degree of difficulties to localise and practice effectively. Third, South Korean firms may face practical dilemma to implement 'exclusive' TM approach. Fourth, South Korean firms may experience dilemma between position-focused and people-focused TM systems.","PeriodicalId":211724,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Export Marketing","volume":"345 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talent management dilemma and distance between South Korea and the USA\",\"authors\":\"Hyun Mi Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijexportm.2020.10032007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Talent management (TM) has attracted significant interest in the management field and it evolved as a North American paradigm and research tradition. Given TM has been mainly researched by Western scholars, commentators have urged that there should be a shift away from Western-centred TM to a focus on broader, more diverse contexts in order to understand the nature of TM in more depth. However, the challenges involved in the transfer of HR practices from one country to another leads to failure to implement effective TM. Based on a robust structured literature analysis, this paper highlights the key dilemmas when emerging countries adopt Western-origin TM practices because of different national contexts including economic growth rate and organisational cultures. This research contributes to the literature on TM in emerging non-Western countries by providing four research propositions. First, adopting TM may not be the best strategy for emerging countries when its economic scale and growth are not large enough to pursue TM practices. Second, there could be a high degree of difficulties to localise and practice effectively. Third, South Korean firms may face practical dilemma to implement 'exclusive' TM approach. Fourth, South Korean firms may experience dilemma between position-focused and people-focused TM systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Export Marketing\",\"volume\":\"345 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Export Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijexportm.2020.10032007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Export Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijexportm.2020.10032007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人才管理(TM)在管理领域引起了极大的兴趣,并发展成为北美的一种范式和研究传统。鉴于TM主要是由西方学者研究的,评论家们敦促应该从以西方为中心的TM转向关注更广泛、更多样化的背景,以便更深入地理解TM的本质。然而,人力资源实践从一个国家转移到另一个国家所面临的挑战导致无法实施有效的传统管理。基于一个强大的结构化文献分析,本文强调了新兴国家采用西方起源的TM实践时,由于不同的国家背景,包括经济增长率和组织文化的关键困境。本研究通过提供四个研究命题,对新兴非西方国家的TM文献做出了贡献。首先,当新兴国家的经济规模和增长不足以推行传统医学实践时,采用传统医学可能不是最好的策略。第二,本地化和有效实践可能会有很大的困难。第三,韩国企业可能面临实施“独家”TM方法的现实困境。第四,韩国企业可能会遇到以职位为中心和以人为中心的TM系统之间的困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Talent management dilemma and distance between South Korea and the USA
Talent management (TM) has attracted significant interest in the management field and it evolved as a North American paradigm and research tradition. Given TM has been mainly researched by Western scholars, commentators have urged that there should be a shift away from Western-centred TM to a focus on broader, more diverse contexts in order to understand the nature of TM in more depth. However, the challenges involved in the transfer of HR practices from one country to another leads to failure to implement effective TM. Based on a robust structured literature analysis, this paper highlights the key dilemmas when emerging countries adopt Western-origin TM practices because of different national contexts including economic growth rate and organisational cultures. This research contributes to the literature on TM in emerging non-Western countries by providing four research propositions. First, adopting TM may not be the best strategy for emerging countries when its economic scale and growth are not large enough to pursue TM practices. Second, there could be a high degree of difficulties to localise and practice effectively. Third, South Korean firms may face practical dilemma to implement 'exclusive' TM approach. Fourth, South Korean firms may experience dilemma between position-focused and people-focused TM systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信