港口国监督:海上人命安全、海洋环境保护和过境货物安全的一个重要概念

A. Knight
{"title":"港口国监督:海上人命安全、海洋环境保护和过境货物安全的一个重要概念","authors":"A. Knight","doi":"10.1163/9789004380271_080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historically, the power to regulate merchant ships resided with the nation where the ship was registered. When seaborne trade was geographically limited, this method of control was somewhat effective. With the expansion of the European empires, the ability of nations to regulate ships flying their flag was diminished by distance, and they would appoint consuls, or merchants, to represent them in distant ports, and they would advise masters on commercial matters, and on local ship-repair facilities. Lloyd’s of London, which, as insurers, had a financial interest in arranging reliable repairs to damaged ships, began in the 1740s, to hire shipwrights to represent their interests in overseas ports, and to appoint surveyors at major ports along the trade routes of the British Empire. Other nations, such as France, Germany, Norway, and the United States adopted this system, which worked fairly well for 200 years. However, in 1967, the Arab-Israeli War resulted in the closure of the Suez Canal, lengthening oil supply-lines of the Western industrial nations, as ships were forced to travel from the Middle East using the longer route past the southern tip of Africa. As a result, freight rates increased dramatically, prompting the ordering of hundreds of ships to take advantage of these increased rates. When the Suez Canal re-opened in 1975, too many ships were chasing too few cargoes, and freight rates plummeted. Many shipowners went bankrupt, and those who survived had to drastically cut their costs. Most of a shipowner’s costs are ‘hard costs’ (mortgage, insurance, fuel, spare parts) over which there is little control. The only ‘soft costs’ are registration and crewing. Many shipowners removed their ships from the high-cost industrial nations, and re-registered them with lower-cost ‘flags of convenience’ (FoC). By registering with a FoC, the shipowner was able to replace the highwage unionized workforce of industrialized nations with crew from nations with low wages. This labor outsourcing came at a hidden cost as many of the ‘new’ crews were inexperienced, and inadequately trained. This led to several accidents, many involving serious oil-pollution, such as Torrey Canyon (1967) and Argo Merchant (1976), and an awareness that safety standards in merchant shipping were in serious decline. In a related development, the classification","PeriodicalId":423731,"journal":{"name":"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development","volume":"117 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Port State Control: An Important Concept in the Safety of Life at Sea, the Protection of the Marine Environment, and of Goods in Transit\",\"authors\":\"A. Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004380271_080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Historically, the power to regulate merchant ships resided with the nation where the ship was registered. When seaborne trade was geographically limited, this method of control was somewhat effective. With the expansion of the European empires, the ability of nations to regulate ships flying their flag was diminished by distance, and they would appoint consuls, or merchants, to represent them in distant ports, and they would advise masters on commercial matters, and on local ship-repair facilities. Lloyd’s of London, which, as insurers, had a financial interest in arranging reliable repairs to damaged ships, began in the 1740s, to hire shipwrights to represent their interests in overseas ports, and to appoint surveyors at major ports along the trade routes of the British Empire. Other nations, such as France, Germany, Norway, and the United States adopted this system, which worked fairly well for 200 years. However, in 1967, the Arab-Israeli War resulted in the closure of the Suez Canal, lengthening oil supply-lines of the Western industrial nations, as ships were forced to travel from the Middle East using the longer route past the southern tip of Africa. As a result, freight rates increased dramatically, prompting the ordering of hundreds of ships to take advantage of these increased rates. When the Suez Canal re-opened in 1975, too many ships were chasing too few cargoes, and freight rates plummeted. Many shipowners went bankrupt, and those who survived had to drastically cut their costs. Most of a shipowner’s costs are ‘hard costs’ (mortgage, insurance, fuel, spare parts) over which there is little control. The only ‘soft costs’ are registration and crewing. Many shipowners removed their ships from the high-cost industrial nations, and re-registered them with lower-cost ‘flags of convenience’ (FoC). By registering with a FoC, the shipowner was able to replace the highwage unionized workforce of industrialized nations with crew from nations with low wages. This labor outsourcing came at a hidden cost as many of the ‘new’ crews were inexperienced, and inadequately trained. This led to several accidents, many involving serious oil-pollution, such as Torrey Canyon (1967) and Argo Merchant (1976), and an awareness that safety standards in merchant shipping were in serious decline. In a related development, the classification\",\"PeriodicalId\":423731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development\",\"volume\":\"117 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380271_080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Future of Ocean Governance and Capacity Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004380271_080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从历史上看,管理商船的权力属于船舶注册地的国家。当海上贸易在地理上受到限制时,这种控制方法多少有些效果。随着欧洲帝国的扩张,各国管理悬挂本国国旗的船只的能力因距离而减弱,他们会任命执政官或商人,在遥远的港口代表他们,他们会就商业事务和当地的船舶维修设施向船长提供建议。作为保险公司,伦敦劳合社(Lloyd’s of London)在为受损船只安排可靠的维修方面有经济利益,它从18世纪40年代开始雇佣造船工人代表其在海外港口的利益,并在大英帝国贸易路线沿线的主要港口任命测定员。其他国家,如法国、德国、挪威和美国都采用了这种制度,这种制度运行了200年。然而,1967年,阿以战争导致苏伊士运河关闭,延长了西方工业国家的石油供应线,因为船只被迫从中东出发,使用经过非洲南端的更长的路线。结果,运费大幅上涨,促使数百艘船只订购,以利用这些上涨的运费。当苏伊士运河于1975年重新开放时,太多的船只追逐太少的货物,运费暴跌。许多船东破产了,那些幸存下来的船东不得不大幅削减成本。船东的大部分成本都是难以控制的“硬成本”(抵押贷款、保险、燃料、备件)。唯一的“软成本”是注册和船员。许多船东将他们的船从高成本的工业国家移走,并以低成本的“方便旗”(FoC)重新注册。通过在FoC注册,船东能够用来自低工资国家的船员取代工业化国家的高工资工会劳动力。这种劳务外包带来了隐性成本,因为许多“新”员工缺乏经验,也没有接受过充分的培训。这导致了几起事故,其中许多涉及严重的石油污染,如多利峡谷(1967年)和阿尔戈商人(1976年),人们意识到商船的安全标准正在严重下降。在一个相关的发展中,分类
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Port State Control: An Important Concept in the Safety of Life at Sea, the Protection of the Marine Environment, and of Goods in Transit
Historically, the power to regulate merchant ships resided with the nation where the ship was registered. When seaborne trade was geographically limited, this method of control was somewhat effective. With the expansion of the European empires, the ability of nations to regulate ships flying their flag was diminished by distance, and they would appoint consuls, or merchants, to represent them in distant ports, and they would advise masters on commercial matters, and on local ship-repair facilities. Lloyd’s of London, which, as insurers, had a financial interest in arranging reliable repairs to damaged ships, began in the 1740s, to hire shipwrights to represent their interests in overseas ports, and to appoint surveyors at major ports along the trade routes of the British Empire. Other nations, such as France, Germany, Norway, and the United States adopted this system, which worked fairly well for 200 years. However, in 1967, the Arab-Israeli War resulted in the closure of the Suez Canal, lengthening oil supply-lines of the Western industrial nations, as ships were forced to travel from the Middle East using the longer route past the southern tip of Africa. As a result, freight rates increased dramatically, prompting the ordering of hundreds of ships to take advantage of these increased rates. When the Suez Canal re-opened in 1975, too many ships were chasing too few cargoes, and freight rates plummeted. Many shipowners went bankrupt, and those who survived had to drastically cut their costs. Most of a shipowner’s costs are ‘hard costs’ (mortgage, insurance, fuel, spare parts) over which there is little control. The only ‘soft costs’ are registration and crewing. Many shipowners removed their ships from the high-cost industrial nations, and re-registered them with lower-cost ‘flags of convenience’ (FoC). By registering with a FoC, the shipowner was able to replace the highwage unionized workforce of industrialized nations with crew from nations with low wages. This labor outsourcing came at a hidden cost as many of the ‘new’ crews were inexperienced, and inadequately trained. This led to several accidents, many involving serious oil-pollution, such as Torrey Canyon (1967) and Argo Merchant (1976), and an awareness that safety standards in merchant shipping were in serious decline. In a related development, the classification
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信