精神科护士对智障人士倡导态度和倡导干预的人权敏感度和主动性

M. Y. Kim, Yun-A Kim
{"title":"精神科护士对智障人士倡导态度和倡导干预的人权敏感度和主动性","authors":"M. Y. Kim, Yun-A Kim","doi":"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subjects of this study were 199 nurses attending the hospital and community mental health center or psychiatric rehabilitation center in B and K city. Data collected were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 26.0 program. Correlations were calculated for the perception of proactivity, and human rights sensitivity and regression analysis were performed to examine the effect on advocacy attitudes and advocacy interventions. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy attitudes are “proactivity” (β =.532), and “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), and the explanatory power was 60.5%. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy intervention are “proactivity” (β=.532), “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), “turnover” (β=.121), “religion” (β=.092), “position” (β=.083) and the explanatory power was 72.6%. In addition, a continuous program should be developed and offered to psychiatric nurses who may have a positive approach toward advocacy.","PeriodicalId":395795,"journal":{"name":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Rights Sensitivity and Proactivity of Psychiatric Nurses on Advocacy Attitudes, and Advocacy Interventions in Mentally Disabled People\",\"authors\":\"M. Y. Kim, Yun-A Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.141\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The subjects of this study were 199 nurses attending the hospital and community mental health center or psychiatric rehabilitation center in B and K city. Data collected were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 26.0 program. Correlations were calculated for the perception of proactivity, and human rights sensitivity and regression analysis were performed to examine the effect on advocacy attitudes and advocacy interventions. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy attitudes are “proactivity” (β =.532), and “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), and the explanatory power was 60.5%. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy intervention are “proactivity” (β=.532), “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), “turnover” (β=.121), “religion” (β=.092), “position” (β=.083) and the explanatory power was 72.6%. In addition, a continuous program should be developed and offered to psychiatric nurses who may have a positive approach toward advocacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":395795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis\",\"volume\":\"149 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.141\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crisis and Emergency Management: Theory and Praxis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14251/crisisonomy.2023.19.2.141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以B、K市医院及社区精神卫生中心或精神康复中心的199名护士为研究对象。采用SPSS/WIN 26.0软件对收集的数据进行分析。计算了对主动性感知的相关性,并进行了人权敏感性和回归分析,以检查对倡导态度和倡导干预措施的影响。对护士倡导态度影响最大的因素是“主动性”(β=. 532)和“人权敏感性”(β=.291),解释力为60.5%。对护士倡导干预影响最大的因素是“主动性”(β=.532)、“人权敏感性”(β=.291)、“离职”(β=.121)、“宗教信仰”(β=.092)、“职位”(β=.083),解释力为72.6%。此外,应该开发一个持续的项目,并提供给可能对倡导有积极态度的精神科护士。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Rights Sensitivity and Proactivity of Psychiatric Nurses on Advocacy Attitudes, and Advocacy Interventions in Mentally Disabled People
The subjects of this study were 199 nurses attending the hospital and community mental health center or psychiatric rehabilitation center in B and K city. Data collected were analyzed using the SPSS/WIN 26.0 program. Correlations were calculated for the perception of proactivity, and human rights sensitivity and regression analysis were performed to examine the effect on advocacy attitudes and advocacy interventions. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy attitudes are “proactivity” (β =.532), and “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), and the explanatory power was 60.5%. Factors having the greatest influence on nurses’ advocacy intervention are “proactivity” (β=.532), “human rights sensitivity” (β=.291), “turnover” (β=.121), “religion” (β=.092), “position” (β=.083) and the explanatory power was 72.6%. In addition, a continuous program should be developed and offered to psychiatric nurses who may have a positive approach toward advocacy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信