破碎的蝴蝶翅膀:探索纺织混纺在循环经济中的作用,用于回收和拆卸

C. Hall, Laetitia Forst, K. Goldsworthy, R. Earley
{"title":"破碎的蝴蝶翅膀:探索纺织混纺在循环经济中的作用,用于回收和拆卸","authors":"C. Hall, Laetitia Forst, K. Goldsworthy, R. Earley","doi":"10.1080/20511787.2023.2208929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the context of a transition to a more sustainable fashion and textile industry, blended textiles (materials where two or more different resources are combined) are a major issue. These are described as “monstrous hybrids” and used to create “Frankenstein products” that are difficult to recover and recycle. The circular economy champions mono-materiality. It asks that technical and biological materials are kept in separate cycles, as shown in the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s “butterfly model”; named because of its two wing-like sides. But in reality, materials are mixed in most of the textiles that surround us, and fully mono-material design is unrealistic in many cases. The butterfly wings are broken. This paper explores the various ways textile designers make blended textiles and acknowledges their role and creativity when providing solutions for aesthetic and technical requirements. The study draws on the first two authors’ PhD practice research that explored these issues from complementary re-active and pro-active approaches. Both carried out at the University of the Arts London, one project investigated Textile Design for Disassembly and the other Design for Recycling Knitwear. Using an after-action review approach, joint insights from both projects are presented. The paper investigates blending across three themes: hierarchy, technique and fibre type. It focuses on why these themes are relevant to designers and explores their different levels of complexity, before demonstrating how multiple perspectives are necessary to address the complex and systemic issues tied to blend recyclability. The paper concludes that blending and recovery are not mutually exclusive and that blended textiles can, with forethought, form part of the circular economy.","PeriodicalId":275893,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Broken Butterfly Wings: Exploring the Role of Textile Blends in the Circular Economy for Recycling and Disassembly\",\"authors\":\"C. Hall, Laetitia Forst, K. Goldsworthy, R. Earley\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20511787.2023.2208929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the context of a transition to a more sustainable fashion and textile industry, blended textiles (materials where two or more different resources are combined) are a major issue. These are described as “monstrous hybrids” and used to create “Frankenstein products” that are difficult to recover and recycle. The circular economy champions mono-materiality. It asks that technical and biological materials are kept in separate cycles, as shown in the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s “butterfly model”; named because of its two wing-like sides. But in reality, materials are mixed in most of the textiles that surround us, and fully mono-material design is unrealistic in many cases. The butterfly wings are broken. This paper explores the various ways textile designers make blended textiles and acknowledges their role and creativity when providing solutions for aesthetic and technical requirements. The study draws on the first two authors’ PhD practice research that explored these issues from complementary re-active and pro-active approaches. Both carried out at the University of the Arts London, one project investigated Textile Design for Disassembly and the other Design for Recycling Knitwear. Using an after-action review approach, joint insights from both projects are presented. The paper investigates blending across three themes: hierarchy, technique and fibre type. It focuses on why these themes are relevant to designers and explores their different levels of complexity, before demonstrating how multiple perspectives are necessary to address the complex and systemic issues tied to blend recyclability. The paper concludes that blending and recovery are not mutually exclusive and that blended textiles can, with forethought, form part of the circular economy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2023.2208929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Textile Design Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20511787.2023.2208929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在向更可持续的时尚和纺织工业过渡的背景下,混纺纺织品(两种或两种以上不同资源组合的材料)是一个主要问题。这些被描述为“怪异的混血儿”,用于制造难以回收和循环利用的“弗兰肯斯坦产品”。循环经济推崇单一材料。它要求技术材料和生物材料分开保存,正如艾伦·麦克阿瑟基金会的“蝴蝶模型”所示;因其翅膀状的两侧而得名。但实际上,在我们周围的大多数纺织品中,材料都是混合的,在许多情况下,完全单一材料的设计是不现实的。蝴蝶的翅膀断了。本文探讨了纺织品设计师制作混纺纺织品的各种方法,并承认他们在提供美学和技术要求的解决方案时的作用和创造力。该研究借鉴了前两位作者的博士实践研究,从互补的反应和主动的方法探讨了这些问题。这两个项目都是在伦敦艺术大学进行的,一个项目研究了可拆卸的纺织品设计,另一个项目研究了可回收的针织品设计。使用事后审查方法,介绍了两个项目的共同见解。本文从三个方面研究了混纺:层次结构、技术和纤维类型。它侧重于为什么这些主题与设计师相关,并探讨了它们不同程度的复杂性,然后展示了如何从多个角度解决与混合可回收性相关的复杂和系统性问题。本文的结论是,混纺和回收并不是相互排斥的,经过深思熟虑,混纺纺织品可以成为循环经济的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Broken Butterfly Wings: Exploring the Role of Textile Blends in the Circular Economy for Recycling and Disassembly
Abstract In the context of a transition to a more sustainable fashion and textile industry, blended textiles (materials where two or more different resources are combined) are a major issue. These are described as “monstrous hybrids” and used to create “Frankenstein products” that are difficult to recover and recycle. The circular economy champions mono-materiality. It asks that technical and biological materials are kept in separate cycles, as shown in the Ellen MacArthur Foundation’s “butterfly model”; named because of its two wing-like sides. But in reality, materials are mixed in most of the textiles that surround us, and fully mono-material design is unrealistic in many cases. The butterfly wings are broken. This paper explores the various ways textile designers make blended textiles and acknowledges their role and creativity when providing solutions for aesthetic and technical requirements. The study draws on the first two authors’ PhD practice research that explored these issues from complementary re-active and pro-active approaches. Both carried out at the University of the Arts London, one project investigated Textile Design for Disassembly and the other Design for Recycling Knitwear. Using an after-action review approach, joint insights from both projects are presented. The paper investigates blending across three themes: hierarchy, technique and fibre type. It focuses on why these themes are relevant to designers and explores their different levels of complexity, before demonstrating how multiple perspectives are necessary to address the complex and systemic issues tied to blend recyclability. The paper concludes that blending and recovery are not mutually exclusive and that blended textiles can, with forethought, form part of the circular economy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信