小组学习的小组形成:异质小组效率更高吗?

Astrid Wichmann, Tobias Hecking, M. Elson, N. Christmann, Thomas Herrmann, H. Hoppe
{"title":"小组学习的小组形成:异质小组效率更高吗?","authors":"Astrid Wichmann, Tobias Hecking, M. Elson, N. Christmann, Thomas Herrmann, H. Hoppe","doi":"10.1145/2957792.2965662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is an underexploited potential in enhancing massive online learning courses through small-group learning activities. Size and diversity allow for optimizing group composition in small-group tasks. The purpose of this paper was to investigate how groups formed based on learner behavior affect productivity of students in a small-group task. Students classified as high, average and low were randomly assigned to homogeneous or heterogeneous groups. Results indicate that overall, heterogeneous groups were either similarly or a bit more productive than homogeneous groups. Yet, we found that homogeneous groups classified as high-level were as or more than heterogeneous groups. However, heterogeneous groups were still more productive than homogeneous-average and homogeneous-low groups suggesting heterogeneous groups are the best choice for the entire community. Students classified as low-level were more productive in homogeneous groups, suggesting that grouping less active students together, makes social loafing more difficult and students participate more.","PeriodicalId":297748,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group Formation for Small-Group Learning: Are Heterogeneous Groups More Productive?\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Wichmann, Tobias Hecking, M. Elson, N. Christmann, Thomas Herrmann, H. Hoppe\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2957792.2965662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There is an underexploited potential in enhancing massive online learning courses through small-group learning activities. Size and diversity allow for optimizing group composition in small-group tasks. The purpose of this paper was to investigate how groups formed based on learner behavior affect productivity of students in a small-group task. Students classified as high, average and low were randomly assigned to homogeneous or heterogeneous groups. Results indicate that overall, heterogeneous groups were either similarly or a bit more productive than homogeneous groups. Yet, we found that homogeneous groups classified as high-level were as or more than heterogeneous groups. However, heterogeneous groups were still more productive than homogeneous-average and homogeneous-low groups suggesting heterogeneous groups are the best choice for the entire community. Students classified as low-level were more productive in homogeneous groups, suggesting that grouping less active students together, makes social loafing more difficult and students participate more.\",\"PeriodicalId\":297748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2957792.2965662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Open Collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2957792.2965662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

通过小组学习活动加强大规模在线学习课程的潜力尚未得到充分开发。规模和多样性允许优化小组任务中的小组组成。本研究的目的是探讨基于学习者行为而形成的小组如何影响学生在小组任务中的生产力。被分类为高、中、低的学生被随机分配到同质组或异质组。结果表明,总体而言,异质群体要么相似,要么比同质群体更有生产力。然而,我们发现被归类为高水平的同质群体与异质群体一样或更多。然而,异质群体的生产力仍然高于平均同质和低同质群体,这表明异质群体是整个群落的最佳选择。被分类为低水平的学生在同质群体中更有成效,这表明,将不太活跃的学生分组在一起,会使社交懈怠变得更加困难,学生也会更多地参与进来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group Formation for Small-Group Learning: Are Heterogeneous Groups More Productive?
There is an underexploited potential in enhancing massive online learning courses through small-group learning activities. Size and diversity allow for optimizing group composition in small-group tasks. The purpose of this paper was to investigate how groups formed based on learner behavior affect productivity of students in a small-group task. Students classified as high, average and low were randomly assigned to homogeneous or heterogeneous groups. Results indicate that overall, heterogeneous groups were either similarly or a bit more productive than homogeneous groups. Yet, we found that homogeneous groups classified as high-level were as or more than heterogeneous groups. However, heterogeneous groups were still more productive than homogeneous-average and homogeneous-low groups suggesting heterogeneous groups are the best choice for the entire community. Students classified as low-level were more productive in homogeneous groups, suggesting that grouping less active students together, makes social loafing more difficult and students participate more.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信