验证工作不精确的算术电路

M. Huhn, K. Schneider, T. Kropf, G. Logothetis
{"title":"验证工作不精确的算术电路","authors":"M. Huhn, K. Schneider, T. Kropf, G. Logothetis","doi":"10.1145/307418.307451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If real number calculations are implemented as circuits, only a limited preciseness can be obtained. Hence, formal verification cannot be used to prove the equivalence between the mathematical specification based on real numbers and the corresponding hardware realization. Instead, the number representation has to be taken into account in that certain error bounds have to be verified. For this reason, we propose formal methods to guide the complete design flow of these circuits from the highest abstraction level down to the register-transfer level with formal verification techniques that are appropriate for the corresponding level. Hence, our method is hybrid in the sense that it combines different state-of-the-art verification techniques. Using our method, we establish a more detailed notion of correctness that considers beneath the control and data flow also the preciseness of the numeric calculations. We illustrate the method with the discrete cosine transform as a real-world example.","PeriodicalId":442382,"journal":{"name":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)","volume":"64 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Verifying imprecisely working arithmetic circuits\",\"authors\":\"M. Huhn, K. Schneider, T. Kropf, G. Logothetis\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/307418.307451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"If real number calculations are implemented as circuits, only a limited preciseness can be obtained. Hence, formal verification cannot be used to prove the equivalence between the mathematical specification based on real numbers and the corresponding hardware realization. Instead, the number representation has to be taken into account in that certain error bounds have to be verified. For this reason, we propose formal methods to guide the complete design flow of these circuits from the highest abstraction level down to the register-transfer level with formal verification techniques that are appropriate for the corresponding level. Hence, our method is hybrid in the sense that it combines different state-of-the-art verification techniques. Using our method, we establish a more detailed notion of correctness that considers beneath the control and data flow also the preciseness of the numeric calculations. We illustrate the method with the discrete cosine transform as a real-world example.\",\"PeriodicalId\":442382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)\",\"volume\":\"64 1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/307418.307451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design, Automation and Test in Europe Conference and Exhibition, 1999. Proceedings (Cat. No. PR00078)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/307418.307451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

如果用电路实现实数计算,只能得到有限的精度。因此,不能使用形式验证来证明基于实数的数学规范与相应的硬件实现之间的等价性。相反,必须考虑数字表示,因为必须验证某些错误范围。出于这个原因,我们提出了形式化的方法来指导这些电路的完整设计流程,从最高的抽象级别到寄存器传输级别,使用适合相应级别的形式化验证技术。因此,我们的方法在某种意义上是混合的,它结合了不同的最先进的验证技术。使用我们的方法,我们建立了一个更详细的正确性概念,它考虑了控制和数据流下数值计算的精确性。我们用离散余弦变换作为一个现实世界的例子来说明这种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Verifying imprecisely working arithmetic circuits
If real number calculations are implemented as circuits, only a limited preciseness can be obtained. Hence, formal verification cannot be used to prove the equivalence between the mathematical specification based on real numbers and the corresponding hardware realization. Instead, the number representation has to be taken into account in that certain error bounds have to be verified. For this reason, we propose formal methods to guide the complete design flow of these circuits from the highest abstraction level down to the register-transfer level with formal verification techniques that are appropriate for the corresponding level. Hence, our method is hybrid in the sense that it combines different state-of-the-art verification techniques. Using our method, we establish a more detailed notion of correctness that considers beneath the control and data flow also the preciseness of the numeric calculations. We illustrate the method with the discrete cosine transform as a real-world example.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信