José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García
{"title":"本科课程评估:学生视角","authors":"José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García","doi":"10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as \"satisfied\" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.","PeriodicalId":231544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Educational Management","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curriculum evaluation of an undergraduate program: A student perspective\",\"authors\":\"José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García\",\"doi\":\"10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as \\\"satisfied\\\" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Educational Management\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Educational Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Educational Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Curriculum evaluation of an undergraduate program: A student perspective
Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as "satisfied" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.