本科课程评估:学生视角

José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García
{"title":"本科课程评估:学生视角","authors":"José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García","doi":"10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as \"satisfied\" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.","PeriodicalId":231544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Systems and Educational Management","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curriculum evaluation of an undergraduate program: A student perspective\",\"authors\":\"José Manuel Ochoa-Alcántar, Jesús Alberto Caballero-Valencia, Maricel Rivera-Iribarren, Mario Alberto Vázquez-García\",\"doi\":\"10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as \\\"satisfied\\\" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":231544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Systems and Educational Management\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Systems and Educational Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Systems and Educational Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/jsem.2022.25.9.8.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在课程评估过程的背景下,基于墨西哥公立高等教育机构对其教育计划的学生观点的定量研究结果;该调查涉及课程的五个方面:对研究生概况的满意度、学习内容、方法、评估和因Covid-19而进行的远程应急教学。结果,学生对这五个变量的评价是“满意”的,其中研究生概况的评价最好,平均得分为4.32分。使用性别变量和研究的4个主要变量对独立样本进行学生t检验,结果表明,在p<的情况下,平均值没有显著差异。在任何情况下都是05级。计算了方差的单因素方差分析,以确定年份对相同的4个变量是否有显著影响,结论是至少两组之间对所研究的任何变量的评估手段没有统计学上的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Curriculum evaluation of an undergraduate program: A student perspective
Results of a quantitative research based on students’ perspective of a Mexican public higher education institution regarding their educational program are presented, in the context of a curricular evaluation process; responses of 171 students to a survey that addressed five areas of the curriculum: Level of satisfaction with the graduate profile, learning content, method, evaluation, and remote emergency teaching due Covid-19. As a result, the five variables were valued as "satisfied" by the students, with the graduate profile being the best evaluated with an average of 4.32 points. A Student's t test for independent samples using the variables of sex and the 4 main variables of the study, showed that the means do not differ significantly at the p<.05 level in any of the cases. A one-way ANOVA analysis of variance was calculated to find out if there was a significant influence of the year over the same 4 variables, concluding that there was no statistically significant difference in the means of assessment of any of the variables studied between at least two groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信