超声波刨根。有替代手工仪器的方法吗?体外比较及扫描电镜研究]。

D C van Gogswaardt, V G Behrens
{"title":"超声波刨根。有替代手工仪器的方法吗?体外比较及扫描电镜研究]。","authors":"D C van Gogswaardt,&nbsp;V G Behrens","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study showed no difference between the use of the \"Piezon Master 400\", using four different attachments as compared to the \"Hu Friedy\" Curettes as far the formation of grooves and scratch marks is concerned. Both root planing methods gave rise to a scalloped surface of the root cement. The ultrasonic root planing however showed a more discrete scalloped surface with very small tears and having a hammered appearance. Hand instrumentation showed much wider tears on the root surface structure.</p>","PeriodicalId":23801,"journal":{"name":"Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde mit Zentralblatt","volume":"78 5","pages":"387-92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].\",\"authors\":\"D C van Gogswaardt,&nbsp;V G Behrens\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study showed no difference between the use of the \\\"Piezon Master 400\\\", using four different attachments as compared to the \\\"Hu Friedy\\\" Curettes as far the formation of grooves and scratch marks is concerned. Both root planing methods gave rise to a scalloped surface of the root cement. The ultrasonic root planing however showed a more discrete scalloped surface with very small tears and having a hammered appearance. Hand instrumentation showed much wider tears on the root surface structure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde mit Zentralblatt\",\"volume\":\"78 5\",\"pages\":\"387-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde mit Zentralblatt\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zahn-, Mund-, und Kieferheilkunde mit Zentralblatt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究表明,就形成凹槽和划痕而言,使用“Piezon Master 400”使用四种不同的附件与“Hu Friedy”curttes相比没有区别。两种刨根方法都会使根水泥表面呈扇形。然而,超声刨根显示更离散的扇形表面,有非常小的撕裂和锤打外观。手检显示牙根表面结构撕裂更宽。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].

This study showed no difference between the use of the "Piezon Master 400", using four different attachments as compared to the "Hu Friedy" Curettes as far the formation of grooves and scratch marks is concerned. Both root planing methods gave rise to a scalloped surface of the root cement. The ultrasonic root planing however showed a more discrete scalloped surface with very small tears and having a hammered appearance. Hand instrumentation showed much wider tears on the root surface structure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信