心电图门控和静态锝-99m- sestamibi平面心肌灌注显像:与铊-201的比较及观察变量的研究。

J F Verzijlbergen, M J Cramer, M G Niemeyer, C A Ascoop, E E Van der Wall, E K Pauwels
{"title":"心电图门控和静态锝-99m- sestamibi平面心肌灌注显像:与铊-201的比较及观察变量的研究。","authors":"J F Verzijlbergen,&nbsp;M J Cramer,&nbsp;M G Niemeyer,&nbsp;C A Ascoop,&nbsp;E E Van der Wall,&nbsp;E K Pauwels","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI, myocardial perfusion imaging at rest and during exercise, was performed in 60 consecutive patients. The results were compared with coronary angiographic findings, obtained within 3 months of the exercise test and Thallium-201 images, obtained on the same day and to the same exercise level as Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI exercise. Exact segmental concordance between static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and Thallium-201 was 77% and between the diastolic images and Thallium-201 76%. Concordance between static and diastolic images was 92%. Nineteen percent of all 900 segments demonstrated ischemia with both static and diastolic Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and 20% with Thallium-201. Overall sensitivity to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease with static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI was 86%, specificity 78%, with diastolic images 89% and 70% and with Thallium-201 89% and 78% (differences not significant). Vessel-specific comparative detection rates revealed no statistical significant differences between both radiopharmaceuticals as well. Intra-observer variability for the static images was 12%, for the diastolic images 21% and Thallium-201 14%. Inter-observer variability for the static images was 14%, diastolic images 24%, and Thallium-201 17%. Although the physical characteristics of Tc-SESTAMIBI enable to perform high-count density imaging and electrocardiographic gating, no significant differences are found when planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI images are compared with Thallium-201 and are well within observer variabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":76992,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiologic imaging","volume":"5 2","pages":"60-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ECG-gated and static technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI planar myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 and study of observer variabilities.\",\"authors\":\"J F Verzijlbergen,&nbsp;M J Cramer,&nbsp;M G Niemeyer,&nbsp;C A Ascoop,&nbsp;E E Van der Wall,&nbsp;E K Pauwels\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To assess the diagnostic accuracy of planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI, myocardial perfusion imaging at rest and during exercise, was performed in 60 consecutive patients. The results were compared with coronary angiographic findings, obtained within 3 months of the exercise test and Thallium-201 images, obtained on the same day and to the same exercise level as Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI exercise. Exact segmental concordance between static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and Thallium-201 was 77% and between the diastolic images and Thallium-201 76%. Concordance between static and diastolic images was 92%. Nineteen percent of all 900 segments demonstrated ischemia with both static and diastolic Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and 20% with Thallium-201. Overall sensitivity to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease with static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI was 86%, specificity 78%, with diastolic images 89% and 70% and with Thallium-201 89% and 78% (differences not significant). Vessel-specific comparative detection rates revealed no statistical significant differences between both radiopharmaceuticals as well. Intra-observer variability for the static images was 12%, for the diastolic images 21% and Thallium-201 14%. Inter-observer variability for the static images was 14%, diastolic images 24%, and Thallium-201 17%. Although the physical characteristics of Tc-SESTAMIBI enable to perform high-count density imaging and electrocardiographic gating, no significant differences are found when planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI images are compared with Thallium-201 and are well within observer variabilities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":76992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of physiologic imaging\",\"volume\":\"5 2\",\"pages\":\"60-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of physiologic imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiologic imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了评估平面舒张和静态techneium -99m- sestamibi的诊断准确性,我们对60例连续患者进行静息和运动时的心肌灌注成像。将结果与运动试验后3个月内获得的冠状动脉造影结果以及与techneium -99m- sestamibi运动相同运动水平的当天获得的铊-201图像进行比较。静态techium -99m- sestamibi与铊-201的段段一致性为77%,舒张期图像与铊-201的段段一致性为76%。静态图像与舒张图像的一致性为92%。在所有900个节段中,19%的人在静态和舒张状态下均表现为缺血,20%的人在铊-201组中表现为缺血。用静态锝-99m- sestamibi检测具有血流动力学意义的冠状动脉疾病的总体灵敏度为86%,特异性为78%,舒张图像为89%和70%,铊-201为89%和78%(差异无统计学意义)。血管特异性比较检出率也显示两种放射性药物之间没有统计学上的显著差异。静态图像的观察者内变异性为12%,舒张图像为21%,铊-201为14%。静态图像的观察者间变异性为14%,舒张图像为24%,铊-201为17%。尽管Tc-SESTAMIBI的物理特性使其能够进行高计数密度成像和心电图门控,但当平面舒张和静态techum -99m- sestamibi图像与铊-201相比较时,没有发现显著差异,并且在观察者可变范围内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ECG-gated and static technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI planar myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison with thallium-201 and study of observer variabilities.

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI, myocardial perfusion imaging at rest and during exercise, was performed in 60 consecutive patients. The results were compared with coronary angiographic findings, obtained within 3 months of the exercise test and Thallium-201 images, obtained on the same day and to the same exercise level as Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI exercise. Exact segmental concordance between static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and Thallium-201 was 77% and between the diastolic images and Thallium-201 76%. Concordance between static and diastolic images was 92%. Nineteen percent of all 900 segments demonstrated ischemia with both static and diastolic Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI and 20% with Thallium-201. Overall sensitivity to detect hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease with static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI was 86%, specificity 78%, with diastolic images 89% and 70% and with Thallium-201 89% and 78% (differences not significant). Vessel-specific comparative detection rates revealed no statistical significant differences between both radiopharmaceuticals as well. Intra-observer variability for the static images was 12%, for the diastolic images 21% and Thallium-201 14%. Inter-observer variability for the static images was 14%, diastolic images 24%, and Thallium-201 17%. Although the physical characteristics of Tc-SESTAMIBI enable to perform high-count density imaging and electrocardiographic gating, no significant differences are found when planar diastolic and static Technetium-99m-SESTAMIBI images are compared with Thallium-201 and are well within observer variabilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信