{"title":"强化策略教学对语言迟缓和发育障碍学龄前儿童说者和听者命名反应发展的影响","authors":"Hyesuk Leepark, C. Esther, Yu, Eunhye, Kang, Boreum, Kim, Seungju, Kang, Jisoo, Yu, Yeunhui, Kim, SeonHye","doi":"10.22874/kaba.2020.7.2.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nThe present study tested effects of Intensive Tact Instruction on development of Naming capabilities in preschoolers with language delays and developmental delays. Naming defines as a capability which enable children learn to point as a listener response or learn to tact as speaker response without direct instruction history. We call these responses as a listener Naming or speaker Naming. During the baseline phase, listener Naming capability and speaker Naming capability were probed with Set 1, Set 2, Set 3. All of the participants showed some listener Naming responses. showed lower level of responses as speaker Naming Participant C and Participant E didn’t show speaker Naming and the others showed lower level of speaker Naming responses. During the Intensive Tact Instruction, 86 tact instruction trials were provided in addtion to regular daily instruction trials using 5 stimulus sets, Set 4, Set 5, Set 6, Set 7, Set 8. The Instruction completed when participants reached to preset criterion. Post intevention Naming probe were conducted using the same stimulus sets, Set 1, Set 2, Set 3 as the one used during the baseline probes. Listener Naming responses and speaker Naming responses were imporved significantly in Participant A, Participant B, Participant D. Speaker Naming capabilities were emerged In Participant C and Participant E with the intervention. All of the participants showed some generalized Naming responses with two novel sets of stimuli. The results were discussed in terms of emergences of Naming and prerequisite responses required for implementation of the intensive tact Instruction procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":132513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Intensive Tact Instruction on Development of Speaker and Listener Naming Responses in Preschoolers with Language Delays and Developmental Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Hyesuk Leepark, C. Esther, Yu, Eunhye, Kang, Boreum, Kim, Seungju, Kang, Jisoo, Yu, Yeunhui, Kim, SeonHye\",\"doi\":\"10.22874/kaba.2020.7.2.37\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nThe present study tested effects of Intensive Tact Instruction on development of Naming capabilities in preschoolers with language delays and developmental delays. Naming defines as a capability which enable children learn to point as a listener response or learn to tact as speaker response without direct instruction history. We call these responses as a listener Naming or speaker Naming. During the baseline phase, listener Naming capability and speaker Naming capability were probed with Set 1, Set 2, Set 3. All of the participants showed some listener Naming responses. showed lower level of responses as speaker Naming Participant C and Participant E didn’t show speaker Naming and the others showed lower level of speaker Naming responses. During the Intensive Tact Instruction, 86 tact instruction trials were provided in addtion to regular daily instruction trials using 5 stimulus sets, Set 4, Set 5, Set 6, Set 7, Set 8. The Instruction completed when participants reached to preset criterion. Post intevention Naming probe were conducted using the same stimulus sets, Set 1, Set 2, Set 3 as the one used during the baseline probes. Listener Naming responses and speaker Naming responses were imporved significantly in Participant A, Participant B, Participant D. Speaker Naming capabilities were emerged In Participant C and Participant E with the intervention. All of the participants showed some generalized Naming responses with two novel sets of stimuli. The results were discussed in terms of emergences of Naming and prerequisite responses required for implementation of the intensive tact Instruction procedure.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":132513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22874/kaba.2020.7.2.37\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavior Analysis and Support","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22874/kaba.2020.7.2.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
本研究旨在探讨强化策略教学对语言发育迟缓学龄前儿童命名能力发展的影响。命名被定义为一种能力,使儿童能够在没有直接指导的情况下学习作为听众的反应或学习作为说话者的反应。我们称这些反应为听者命名或说话者命名。在基线阶段,使用集合1、集合2、集合3探测听者命名能力和说话者命名能力。所有的参与者都表现出一些听众命名反应。参与者C和参与者E没有表现出演讲者的姓名,其他参与者表现出较低的演讲者姓名反应。在战术强化教学期间,除了常规的日常教学试验外,还提供了86个战术教学试验,使用5个刺激组,Set 4, Set 5, Set 6, Set 7, Set 8。当参与者达到预设标准时,指令完成。干预后命名探针使用与基线探针相同的刺激集,即Set 1、Set 2、Set 3。参与者A、参与者B、参与者d的听者命名反应和说话者命名反应在干预后显著改善,参与者C和参与者E的说话者命名能力均有所提高。所有的参与者在两组新的刺激下都表现出一些广义的命名反应。结果讨论了命名的出现和实施强化机智教学过程所需的先决条件反应。
Effects of Intensive Tact Instruction on Development of Speaker and Listener Naming Responses in Preschoolers with Language Delays and Developmental Disabilities
The present study tested effects of Intensive Tact Instruction on development of Naming capabilities in preschoolers with language delays and developmental delays. Naming defines as a capability which enable children learn to point as a listener response or learn to tact as speaker response without direct instruction history. We call these responses as a listener Naming or speaker Naming. During the baseline phase, listener Naming capability and speaker Naming capability were probed with Set 1, Set 2, Set 3. All of the participants showed some listener Naming responses. showed lower level of responses as speaker Naming Participant C and Participant E didn’t show speaker Naming and the others showed lower level of speaker Naming responses. During the Intensive Tact Instruction, 86 tact instruction trials were provided in addtion to regular daily instruction trials using 5 stimulus sets, Set 4, Set 5, Set 6, Set 7, Set 8. The Instruction completed when participants reached to preset criterion. Post intevention Naming probe were conducted using the same stimulus sets, Set 1, Set 2, Set 3 as the one used during the baseline probes. Listener Naming responses and speaker Naming responses were imporved significantly in Participant A, Participant B, Participant D. Speaker Naming capabilities were emerged In Participant C and Participant E with the intervention. All of the participants showed some generalized Naming responses with two novel sets of stimuli. The results were discussed in terms of emergences of Naming and prerequisite responses required for implementation of the intensive tact Instruction procedure.