{"title":"差距重建:倡议和抗衡倡议","authors":"T. Metzger","doi":"10.33055/didacticahistorica.2020.006.01.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regarding its argumentation strategies, the construction of difference by the proponents of the popular initiatives on the ban on Jewish ritual slaughter (1893) and the ban on minarets (2009) shows striking similarities. Jews as well as Muslims were excluded as «non-Christian» « others» from Swiss society, meant to live under an inferior legal-societal status. This paper presents four sources for classes in history or political education. The sources are contextualized in a broader analysis of the topic.","PeriodicalId":354218,"journal":{"name":"Didactica Historica","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Argumentative Konstruktion von Differenz: die Schächtverbotsinitiative und die Antiminarettinitiative im Vergleich\",\"authors\":\"T. Metzger\",\"doi\":\"10.33055/didacticahistorica.2020.006.01.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regarding its argumentation strategies, the construction of difference by the proponents of the popular initiatives on the ban on Jewish ritual slaughter (1893) and the ban on minarets (2009) shows striking similarities. Jews as well as Muslims were excluded as «non-Christian» « others» from Swiss society, meant to live under an inferior legal-societal status. This paper presents four sources for classes in history or political education. The sources are contextualized in a broader analysis of the topic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":354218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Didactica Historica\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Didactica Historica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33055/didacticahistorica.2020.006.01.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Didactica Historica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33055/didacticahistorica.2020.006.01.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Argumentative Konstruktion von Differenz: die Schächtverbotsinitiative und die Antiminarettinitiative im Vergleich
Regarding its argumentation strategies, the construction of difference by the proponents of the popular initiatives on the ban on Jewish ritual slaughter (1893) and the ban on minarets (2009) shows striking similarities. Jews as well as Muslims were excluded as «non-Christian» « others» from Swiss society, meant to live under an inferior legal-societal status. This paper presents four sources for classes in history or political education. The sources are contextualized in a broader analysis of the topic.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
