聚来模式对五年级文科生哲学心理学专业趋同思维培养的影响

Mahmoud Khalil Hamad
{"title":"聚来模式对五年级文科生哲学心理学专业趋同思维培养的影响","authors":"Mahmoud Khalil Hamad","doi":"10.55384/2790-4237.1216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aims to identify the effect of the Julai model in developing convergent thinking among fifth-grade literary students in the subject of philosophy and psychology. In order to achieve the goal of the research, the researcher formulated the following hypotheses: 1-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model and the average scores of the control group students who study the same subject in the usual way in the post test of convergent thinking. 2-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The researcher relied on the experimental design with partial control of the two experimental and control groups in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The research sample consisted of two groups, one of them was the experimental group, Division (B), which will study the subject of philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model, with a number of (31) students, while the Division (A) represented the control group that will study the same subject according to the usual method, with a rate of (33 ) students, and the researcher made parity between the students of the two research groups in the following variables: (convergent thinking, chronological age calculated in months, educational level of fathers, academic level of mothers, general average for the previous academic year, intelligence test). The researcher adopted the convergent thinking test to measure his research variables, and the final test may consist of (6) skills and included (30) paragraphs, and the researcher verified its sincerity, stability and distinction. The researcher applied the pre-test for convergent thinking on Sunday (2/23/2021) before starting the experiment, and then applied the experiment on Wednesday (26/2/2021) and continued for a whole semester, ending on Monday (25/5/2021). After completing the experiment, the researcher applied the post-test for convergent thinking on Thursday (28/5/2021)","PeriodicalId":397046,"journal":{"name":"Journal of STEPS for Humanities and Social Sciences","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of the Julai model on developing convergent thinking among fifth-grade literary students in the subject of philosophy and psychology\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Khalil Hamad\",\"doi\":\"10.55384/2790-4237.1216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research aims to identify the effect of the Julai model in developing convergent thinking among fifth-grade literary students in the subject of philosophy and psychology. In order to achieve the goal of the research, the researcher formulated the following hypotheses: 1-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model and the average scores of the control group students who study the same subject in the usual way in the post test of convergent thinking. 2-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The researcher relied on the experimental design with partial control of the two experimental and control groups in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The research sample consisted of two groups, one of them was the experimental group, Division (B), which will study the subject of philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model, with a number of (31) students, while the Division (A) represented the control group that will study the same subject according to the usual method, with a rate of (33 ) students, and the researcher made parity between the students of the two research groups in the following variables: (convergent thinking, chronological age calculated in months, educational level of fathers, academic level of mothers, general average for the previous academic year, intelligence test). The researcher adopted the convergent thinking test to measure his research variables, and the final test may consist of (6) skills and included (30) paragraphs, and the researcher verified its sincerity, stability and distinction. The researcher applied the pre-test for convergent thinking on Sunday (2/23/2021) before starting the experiment, and then applied the experiment on Wednesday (26/2/2021) and continued for a whole semester, ending on Monday (25/5/2021). After completing the experiment, the researcher applied the post-test for convergent thinking on Thursday (28/5/2021)\",\"PeriodicalId\":397046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of STEPS for Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"182 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of STEPS for Humanities and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55384/2790-4237.1216\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of STEPS for Humanities and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55384/2790-4237.1216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨聚来模式在培养五年级文学专业哲学与心理学专业学生趋同思维中的作用。为了达到研究的目的,研究者提出了以下假设:1 .采用聚来模型学习哲学和心理学的实验组学生与采用常规方法学习同一学科的对照组学生在收敛思维后测中的平均成绩在显著性水平(0.05)上无统计学差异。2 .按照Julai模型学习哲学和心理学的实验组学生在收敛思维前、后测试中的平均得分差异无统计学意义(0.05)。研究者在收敛思维的前、后测试中采用了试验组和对照组部分控制的实验设计。研究样本分为两组,其中一组是实验组(B),按照Julai模型研究哲学和心理学这门学科,有31名学生,而对照组(a)按照通常的方法研究同一门学科,有33名学生,研究者对两个研究组的学生在以下变量上进行了对比:(收敛性思维,按月计算的实足年龄,父亲的受教育程度,母亲的学术水平,前一学年的平均水平,智力测试)。研究者采用了收敛思维测试来测量他的研究变量,最终的测试可能包含(6)个技能,包含(30)个段落,研究者验证了它的真诚性、稳定性和区别性。在实验开始前,研究者在周日(2/23/2021)进行了收敛思维的预测试,然后在周三(26/2/2021)进行了实验,持续了一整个学期,直到周一(25/5/2021)结束。完成实验后,研究人员于周四(28/5/2021)进行了收敛思维后验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of the Julai model on developing convergent thinking among fifth-grade literary students in the subject of philosophy and psychology
The research aims to identify the effect of the Julai model in developing convergent thinking among fifth-grade literary students in the subject of philosophy and psychology. In order to achieve the goal of the research, the researcher formulated the following hypotheses: 1-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model and the average scores of the control group students who study the same subject in the usual way in the post test of convergent thinking. 2-There is no statistically significant difference at the significance level (0.05) between the average scores of the experimental group students who study philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The researcher relied on the experimental design with partial control of the two experimental and control groups in the pre and post test of convergent thinking. The research sample consisted of two groups, one of them was the experimental group, Division (B), which will study the subject of philosophy and psychology according to the Julai model, with a number of (31) students, while the Division (A) represented the control group that will study the same subject according to the usual method, with a rate of (33 ) students, and the researcher made parity between the students of the two research groups in the following variables: (convergent thinking, chronological age calculated in months, educational level of fathers, academic level of mothers, general average for the previous academic year, intelligence test). The researcher adopted the convergent thinking test to measure his research variables, and the final test may consist of (6) skills and included (30) paragraphs, and the researcher verified its sincerity, stability and distinction. The researcher applied the pre-test for convergent thinking on Sunday (2/23/2021) before starting the experiment, and then applied the experiment on Wednesday (26/2/2021) and continued for a whole semester, ending on Monday (25/5/2021). After completing the experiment, the researcher applied the post-test for convergent thinking on Thursday (28/5/2021)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信