统一的顺序等效检查方法,用于验证RTL设计中的高级功能和协议规范实现

Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang
{"title":"统一的顺序等效检查方法,用于验证RTL设计中的高级功能和协议规范实现","authors":"Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang","doi":"10.1109/LATW.2014.6841905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formal techniques provide exhaustive design verification, but computational margins have an important negative impact on its efficiency. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but traditionally it has been only applied between circuit descriptions with one-to-one correspondence for states. Applying it between RTL descriptions and high-level reference models requires removing signals, variables and states exclusive of the RTL description so as to comply with the state correspondence restriction. In this paper, we extend a previous formal methodology for RTL verification with high-level models, to check also the signals and protocol implemented in the RTL design. This protocol implementation is compared formally to a description captured from the specification. Thus, we can prove thoroughly the sequential behavior of a design under verification.","PeriodicalId":305922,"journal":{"name":"2014 15th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW","volume":"242 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A unified sequential equivalence checking approach to verify high-level functionality and protocol specification implementations in RTL designs\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Ivan Castro Marquez, M. Strum, J. Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LATW.2014.6841905\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Formal techniques provide exhaustive design verification, but computational margins have an important negative impact on its efficiency. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but traditionally it has been only applied between circuit descriptions with one-to-one correspondence for states. Applying it between RTL descriptions and high-level reference models requires removing signals, variables and states exclusive of the RTL description so as to comply with the state correspondence restriction. In this paper, we extend a previous formal methodology for RTL verification with high-level models, to check also the signals and protocol implemented in the RTL design. This protocol implementation is compared formally to a description captured from the specification. Thus, we can prove thoroughly the sequential behavior of a design under verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 15th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW\",\"volume\":\"242 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 15th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LATW.2014.6841905\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 15th Latin American Test Workshop - LATW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LATW.2014.6841905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

正式技术提供详尽的设计验证,但计算余量对其效率有重要的负面影响。顺序等价检验是一种有效的方法,但传统上它只应用于状态一一对应的电路描述之间。将其应用于RTL描述和高级参考模型之间,需要去除RTL描述之外的信号、变量和状态,以符合状态对应限制。在本文中,我们用高级模型扩展了以前用于RTL验证的形式化方法,以检查RTL设计中实现的信号和协议。将此协议实现与从规范中捕获的描述进行正式比较。因此,我们可以彻底证明在验证下的设计的顺序行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A unified sequential equivalence checking approach to verify high-level functionality and protocol specification implementations in RTL designs
Formal techniques provide exhaustive design verification, but computational margins have an important negative impact on its efficiency. Sequential equivalence checking is an effective approach, but traditionally it has been only applied between circuit descriptions with one-to-one correspondence for states. Applying it between RTL descriptions and high-level reference models requires removing signals, variables and states exclusive of the RTL description so as to comply with the state correspondence restriction. In this paper, we extend a previous formal methodology for RTL verification with high-level models, to check also the signals and protocol implemented in the RTL design. This protocol implementation is compared formally to a description captured from the specification. Thus, we can prove thoroughly the sequential behavior of a design under verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信