{"title":"失序肾切瘤用于重新治疗血清双胞胎","authors":"Jakob Büchler","doi":"10.1159/000500129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of sorafenib or sunitinib as neoadjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus. Methods: A total of 92 RCC patients with tumor thrombus were included in this 2-center retrospective research from January 2007 to December 2014. Sorafenib and sunitinib were administered as neoadjuvant therapy in 9 patients and 14 patients, respectively, and 69 patients constituted non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes of patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Results: The overall median RFS and OS time for all 92 patients were 28 months (95% CI 17-39 months) and 42 months (95% CI 30-54 months). Patients with neoadjuvant therapy had no significantly longer median RFS (30 vs. 28 months, p = 0.376) and OS (45 vs. 42 months, p = 0.702) than those without neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy of sorafenib or sunitinib might not improve survival outcomes for high risk RCC patients with tumor thrombus. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy for RCC with tumor thrombus should be considered cautiously.","PeriodicalId":351794,"journal":{"name":"Karger Kompass Onkologie","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nicht metastasiertes Nierenzellkarzinom mit Tumorthrombus: Sunitinib und Sorafenib in der neoadjuvanten Therapie\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Büchler\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000500129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of sorafenib or sunitinib as neoadjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus. Methods: A total of 92 RCC patients with tumor thrombus were included in this 2-center retrospective research from January 2007 to December 2014. Sorafenib and sunitinib were administered as neoadjuvant therapy in 9 patients and 14 patients, respectively, and 69 patients constituted non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes of patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Results: The overall median RFS and OS time for all 92 patients were 28 months (95% CI 17-39 months) and 42 months (95% CI 30-54 months). Patients with neoadjuvant therapy had no significantly longer median RFS (30 vs. 28 months, p = 0.376) and OS (45 vs. 42 months, p = 0.702) than those without neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy of sorafenib or sunitinib might not improve survival outcomes for high risk RCC patients with tumor thrombus. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy for RCC with tumor thrombus should be considered cautiously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":351794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Karger Kompass Onkologie\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Karger Kompass Onkologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Karger Kompass Onkologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000500129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究的目的是探讨索拉非尼或舒尼替尼作为新辅助治疗对肾细胞癌(RCC)合并肿瘤血栓生存结局的影响。方法:对2007年1月至2014年12月92例合并肿瘤血栓的RCC患者进行双中心回顾性研究。索拉非尼组9例,舒尼替尼组14例,非新辅助治疗组69例。采用Kaplan-Meier法估计无复发生存期(RFS)和总生存期(OS)。Log-rank检验用于比较接受或未接受新辅助治疗的患者的生存结果。结果:所有92例患者的总中位RFS和OS时间分别为28个月(95% CI 17-39个月)和42个月(95% CI 30-54个月)。接受新辅助治疗的患者的中位RFS(30个月vs 28个月,p = 0.376)和OS(45个月vs 42个月,p = 0.702)均不明显长于未接受新辅助治疗的患者。结论:索拉非尼或舒尼替尼的新辅助治疗可能不能改善有肿瘤血栓的高危RCC患者的生存结果。因此,对于合并肿瘤血栓的RCC,应慎重考虑新辅助治疗。
Nicht metastasiertes Nierenzellkarzinom mit Tumorthrombus: Sunitinib und Sorafenib in der neoadjuvanten Therapie
Objectives: The purpose of this work was to investigate the effect of sorafenib or sunitinib as neoadjuvant therapy on the survival outcomes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with tumor thrombus. Methods: A total of 92 RCC patients with tumor thrombus were included in this 2-center retrospective research from January 2007 to December 2014. Sorafenib and sunitinib were administered as neoadjuvant therapy in 9 patients and 14 patients, respectively, and 69 patients constituted non-neoadjuvant therapy groups. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Log-rank test was used to compare the survival outcomes of patients with or without neoadjuvant therapy. Results: The overall median RFS and OS time for all 92 patients were 28 months (95% CI 17-39 months) and 42 months (95% CI 30-54 months). Patients with neoadjuvant therapy had no significantly longer median RFS (30 vs. 28 months, p = 0.376) and OS (45 vs. 42 months, p = 0.702) than those without neoadjuvant therapy. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy of sorafenib or sunitinib might not improve survival outcomes for high risk RCC patients with tumor thrombus. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy for RCC with tumor thrombus should be considered cautiously.