八大会计师事务所与非八大会计师事务所的保守性差异

Sudipta Basu, Lee-Seok Hwang, C. Jan
{"title":"八大会计师事务所与非八大会计师事务所的保守性差异","authors":"Sudipta Basu, Lee-Seok Hwang, C. Jan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2428836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auditors’ incentives to be conservative are likely to vary both cross-sectionally and over time based on their legal liability exposure. We predict that Big Eight (Six/Five) auditors are likely to be more conservative than non-Big Eight Auditors. We show that the earnings reported by Big Eight auditees are more conservative than the earnings of non-Big Eight auditees, utilizing several measures from Basu (1997). The difference in conservatism between Big Eight and non-Big Eight auditees is higher in periods of high auditor liability exposure, consistent with Big Eight auditors being relatively more conservative when exposed to greater legal liability.","PeriodicalId":352516,"journal":{"name":"Fox: Finance (Topic)","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"146","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Conservatism between Big Eight and Non-Big Eight Auditors\",\"authors\":\"Sudipta Basu, Lee-Seok Hwang, C. Jan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2428836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Auditors’ incentives to be conservative are likely to vary both cross-sectionally and over time based on their legal liability exposure. We predict that Big Eight (Six/Five) auditors are likely to be more conservative than non-Big Eight Auditors. We show that the earnings reported by Big Eight auditees are more conservative than the earnings of non-Big Eight auditees, utilizing several measures from Basu (1997). The difference in conservatism between Big Eight and non-Big Eight auditees is higher in periods of high auditor liability exposure, consistent with Big Eight auditors being relatively more conservative when exposed to greater legal liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":352516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fox: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"146\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fox: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fox: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2428836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 146

摘要

审计师保持保守的动机可能会因其法律责任敞口的不同而有所不同。我们预测八大(六/五)审计公司可能比非八大审计公司更保守。我们利用Basu(1997)的几个指标表明,八大被审计机构报告的收益比非八大被审计机构的收益更保守。八大会计师事务所与非八大会计师事务所之间的保守性差异在审计师负债较高的时期更大,这与八大会计师事务所在面临更大的法律责任时相对更保守是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Conservatism between Big Eight and Non-Big Eight Auditors
Auditors’ incentives to be conservative are likely to vary both cross-sectionally and over time based on their legal liability exposure. We predict that Big Eight (Six/Five) auditors are likely to be more conservative than non-Big Eight Auditors. We show that the earnings reported by Big Eight auditees are more conservative than the earnings of non-Big Eight auditees, utilizing several measures from Basu (1997). The difference in conservatism between Big Eight and non-Big Eight auditees is higher in periods of high auditor liability exposure, consistent with Big Eight auditors being relatively more conservative when exposed to greater legal liability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信