国家行政法院判决执行的缺陷:以印尼为例

F. Harjiyatni, Farid Yulianto
{"title":"国家行政法院判决执行的缺陷:以印尼为例","authors":"F. Harjiyatni, Farid Yulianto","doi":"10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fair legal protection is hampered by the Administrative Court Verdicts that cannot be enforced in the event that the government officials as the defendants are not willing to voluntarily carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The presence of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning the Government Administration does not provide a way out to overcome this obstacle. The Government Administration Law gives the authority to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts entirely to the executives/government. The Administrative Court is not authorized to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The Government Administration Law further weakens the functions of the Administrative Court, because the Administrative Court does not have the authority to carry out the verdicts, and in fact the authority is fully delegated to the executives/government. Optimal legal protection for the people is very dependent on the legal awareness of the officials to comply with the Administrative Court Verdicts.","PeriodicalId":202366,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weaknesses Of The Implementation Of The State Administrative Court Verdicts: A Case Study In Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"F. Harjiyatni, Farid Yulianto\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fair legal protection is hampered by the Administrative Court Verdicts that cannot be enforced in the event that the government officials as the defendants are not willing to voluntarily carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The presence of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning the Government Administration does not provide a way out to overcome this obstacle. The Government Administration Law gives the authority to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts entirely to the executives/government. The Administrative Court is not authorized to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The Government Administration Law further weakens the functions of the Administrative Court, because the Administrative Court does not have the authority to carry out the verdicts, and in fact the authority is fully delegated to the executives/government. Optimal legal protection for the people is very dependent on the legal awareness of the officials to comply with the Administrative Court Verdicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202366,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 3rd English Language and Literature International Conference, ELLiC, 27th April 2019, Semarang, Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.27-4-2019.2285595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公平的法律保护受到行政法院判决的阻碍,如果作为被告的政府官员不愿意自愿执行行政法院判决,则行政法院判决无法执行。关于政府行政的2014年第30号法的存在并没有提供克服这一障碍的出路。《政府行政法》将执行行政法院判决的权力完全赋予行政机关/政府。行政法院无权执行行政法院的判决。《政府行政法》进一步削弱了行政法院的职能,因为行政法院没有执行判决的权力,实际上权力完全下放给了行政机关/政府。对人民的最佳法律保护在很大程度上取决于官员遵守行政法院判决的法律意识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weaknesses Of The Implementation Of The State Administrative Court Verdicts: A Case Study In Indonesia
Fair legal protection is hampered by the Administrative Court Verdicts that cannot be enforced in the event that the government officials as the defendants are not willing to voluntarily carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The presence of Law No. 30 of 2014 concerning the Government Administration does not provide a way out to overcome this obstacle. The Government Administration Law gives the authority to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts entirely to the executives/government. The Administrative Court is not authorized to carry out the Administrative Court Verdicts. The Government Administration Law further weakens the functions of the Administrative Court, because the Administrative Court does not have the authority to carry out the verdicts, and in fact the authority is fully delegated to the executives/government. Optimal legal protection for the people is very dependent on the legal awareness of the officials to comply with the Administrative Court Verdicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信