跨越麻烦的水:一个意大利的案例研究,一个工人恢复的公司

Marco Zurru, Barbara Barbieri, A. Contu
{"title":"跨越麻烦的水:一个意大利的案例研究,一个工人恢复的公司","authors":"Marco Zurru, Barbara Barbieri, A. Contu","doi":"10.3280/so2022-001002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worker-recovered firms represent a new type of cooperatives, created through workers' buyouts (WBOs), whereby workers buy the property of the firm to re-structure, rescue or convert it. In Italy, recovery is supported by a vast legislative apparatus (such as the Marcora Law) and by the cooperative world. This paper reflects on the processes of resistance to closure and the resulting job loss that al-low experimenting with new organizational practices within a different logic of management, such as solidarity and job protection. Presenting a case study with an inductive chain of reasoning we identify the articulation of institutional opportunities present in the Italian context and highlight which organizational processes are generated in the recovery and conversion of a WBO firm characterized as a \"hybrid organization\". The paper first focuses on the Italian context with reference to existing secondary data and published material, clarifying why this organizational transformation must be explained within an institutional framework. It then outlines the theoretical background that allowed us to explore the organizational functioning of WBOs through the framework of institutional theory. Finally, we present the results and conclude with a discussion of our empirical and theoretical contribution.","PeriodicalId":305932,"journal":{"name":"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridge over troubled water: an Italian case study of a worker-recovered firm\",\"authors\":\"Marco Zurru, Barbara Barbieri, A. Contu\",\"doi\":\"10.3280/so2022-001002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Worker-recovered firms represent a new type of cooperatives, created through workers' buyouts (WBOs), whereby workers buy the property of the firm to re-structure, rescue or convert it. In Italy, recovery is supported by a vast legislative apparatus (such as the Marcora Law) and by the cooperative world. This paper reflects on the processes of resistance to closure and the resulting job loss that al-low experimenting with new organizational practices within a different logic of management, such as solidarity and job protection. Presenting a case study with an inductive chain of reasoning we identify the articulation of institutional opportunities present in the Italian context and highlight which organizational processes are generated in the recovery and conversion of a WBO firm characterized as a \\\"hybrid organization\\\". The paper first focuses on the Italian context with reference to existing secondary data and published material, clarifying why this organizational transformation must be explained within an institutional framework. It then outlines the theoretical background that allowed us to explore the organizational functioning of WBOs through the framework of institutional theory. Finally, we present the results and conclude with a discussion of our empirical and theoretical contribution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3280/so2022-001002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/so2022-001002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

工人恢复的公司代表了一种新型的合作社,通过工人买断(WBOs)创建,工人购买公司的财产来重组、拯救或改造它。在意大利,庞大的立法机构(如《马尔科拉法》)和合作界支持着经济复苏。本文反映了在不同的管理逻辑(如团结和工作保护)下尝试新的组织实践的抵制关闭和由此导致的工作损失的过程。通过归纳推理链的案例研究,我们确定了意大利背景下存在的制度机会的衔接,并强调了在以“混合型组织”为特征的WBO公司的恢复和转变中产生的组织过程。本文首先将重点放在意大利的背景下,参考现有的二手数据和出版材料,澄清为什么必须在制度框架内解释这种组织转型。然后,概述了理论背景,使我们能够通过制度理论的框架来探索wbo的组织功能。最后,我们提出了结果,并讨论了我们的经验和理论贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridge over troubled water: an Italian case study of a worker-recovered firm
Worker-recovered firms represent a new type of cooperatives, created through workers' buyouts (WBOs), whereby workers buy the property of the firm to re-structure, rescue or convert it. In Italy, recovery is supported by a vast legislative apparatus (such as the Marcora Law) and by the cooperative world. This paper reflects on the processes of resistance to closure and the resulting job loss that al-low experimenting with new organizational practices within a different logic of management, such as solidarity and job protection. Presenting a case study with an inductive chain of reasoning we identify the articulation of institutional opportunities present in the Italian context and highlight which organizational processes are generated in the recovery and conversion of a WBO firm characterized as a "hybrid organization". The paper first focuses on the Italian context with reference to existing secondary data and published material, clarifying why this organizational transformation must be explained within an institutional framework. It then outlines the theoretical background that allowed us to explore the organizational functioning of WBOs through the framework of institutional theory. Finally, we present the results and conclude with a discussion of our empirical and theoretical contribution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信