用奥斯特罗姆修正城市规划:现有城市采用多中心、自下而上的土地利用调控策略

J. Myers
{"title":"用奥斯特罗姆修正城市规划:现有城市采用多中心、自下而上的土地利用调控策略","authors":"J. Myers","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3561745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Campaigns to address high housing costs by reforming urban planning to allow more housing have had some notable successes, but they continue to face considerable opposition. Proposals often involve top-down preemption of municipal zoning decisions by higher authorities such as state legislatures.<br><br>In places where reform remains politically difficult, I suggest trying the opposite tactic to overcome opposition: introducing laws to allow ultralocal, bottom-up land use decisions, which would address spillover and other concerns and enable win-win bargaining to permit more housing. This tactic draws upon research in the field of common-pool resources founded by Elinor Ostrom. Under my suggested approach, small communities would be able to demand a share of the profits from development in exchange for allowing it on terms and in a form that they like.","PeriodicalId":137820,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: National","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixing Urban Planning with Ostrom: Strategies for Existing Cities to Adopt Polycentric, Bottom-Up Regulation of Land Use\",\"authors\":\"J. Myers\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3561745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Campaigns to address high housing costs by reforming urban planning to allow more housing have had some notable successes, but they continue to face considerable opposition. Proposals often involve top-down preemption of municipal zoning decisions by higher authorities such as state legislatures.<br><br>In places where reform remains politically difficult, I suggest trying the opposite tactic to overcome opposition: introducing laws to allow ultralocal, bottom-up land use decisions, which would address spillover and other concerns and enable win-win bargaining to permit more housing. This tactic draws upon research in the field of common-pool resources founded by Elinor Ostrom. Under my suggested approach, small communities would be able to demand a share of the profits from development in exchange for allowing it on terms and in a form that they like.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Political Economy: National\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Political Economy: National\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3561745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过改革城市规划以允许更多住房来解决高住房成本的运动取得了一些显著的成功,但它们仍然面临着相当大的反对。提案通常涉及由州立法机构等上级当局自上而下地优先执行市政分区决定。在改革在政治上仍然困难的地方,我建议尝试相反的策略来克服反对:制定法律,允许极端地方的、自下而上的土地使用决策,这将解决溢出效应和其他问题,并实现双赢的谈判,以允许更多的住房。这一策略借鉴了埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆在公共资源领域的研究。根据我建议的方法,小社区可以要求从开发中分得一部分利润,作为交换,以他们喜欢的条件和形式允许开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fixing Urban Planning with Ostrom: Strategies for Existing Cities to Adopt Polycentric, Bottom-Up Regulation of Land Use
Campaigns to address high housing costs by reforming urban planning to allow more housing have had some notable successes, but they continue to face considerable opposition. Proposals often involve top-down preemption of municipal zoning decisions by higher authorities such as state legislatures.

In places where reform remains politically difficult, I suggest trying the opposite tactic to overcome opposition: introducing laws to allow ultralocal, bottom-up land use decisions, which would address spillover and other concerns and enable win-win bargaining to permit more housing. This tactic draws upon research in the field of common-pool resources founded by Elinor Ostrom. Under my suggested approach, small communities would be able to demand a share of the profits from development in exchange for allowing it on terms and in a form that they like.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信