巽他文化系高中生社会科学问题索赔技能的研究

Bambang Ekanara, N. Rustaman, Hernawati Hernawati
{"title":"巽他文化系高中生社会科学问题索赔技能的研究","authors":"Bambang Ekanara, N. Rustaman, Hernawati Hernawati","doi":"10.30870/BIODIDAKTIKA.V11I2.1585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This case study purposes to investigate Sundanese high school student 11th grade argumentation skills about socio-scientific issue based on gender and family caring pattern. Specifically, this qualitative research explores the quality of Sundanese student’ claim-forming and evidence-supplying in an argumentation process. Research instrument were given to 44 year-11 students, argumentation worksheets were used to get student’ written argumentation skills (WAS) data; semi-structured interview were used to get student’ oral argumentation skills (OAS) data; questionnaire and interview were used to get family caring pattern and family gender awareness data; furthermore, field note were used as data triangulation tool. Student’ argumentation skills were determined by justification of argument based on four-scale rubric. Inductive analysis was used to examine the data. Most Sundanese student had capable to form an argument with a simple justification; student’ OAS better than WAS relatively; and other  result of this study shows that no argumentation skills significance difference between boys and girl. The findings suggest several factors influencing Sundanese student’ argumentation skills such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, student’ role in family, the language ability to articulate ideas, and  cultural influences. Methodological issues arising from the study and implications for teaching and assessment are discussed.","PeriodicalId":411495,"journal":{"name":"BIODIDAKTIKA: JURNAL BIOLOGI DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STUDI TENTANG KETERAMPILAN PEMBENTUKAN KLAIM MENGENAI ISU SOSIO-SAINTIFIK SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS PADA KELOMPOK BUDAYA SUNDA\",\"authors\":\"Bambang Ekanara, N. Rustaman, Hernawati Hernawati\",\"doi\":\"10.30870/BIODIDAKTIKA.V11I2.1585\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This case study purposes to investigate Sundanese high school student 11th grade argumentation skills about socio-scientific issue based on gender and family caring pattern. Specifically, this qualitative research explores the quality of Sundanese student’ claim-forming and evidence-supplying in an argumentation process. Research instrument were given to 44 year-11 students, argumentation worksheets were used to get student’ written argumentation skills (WAS) data; semi-structured interview were used to get student’ oral argumentation skills (OAS) data; questionnaire and interview were used to get family caring pattern and family gender awareness data; furthermore, field note were used as data triangulation tool. Student’ argumentation skills were determined by justification of argument based on four-scale rubric. Inductive analysis was used to examine the data. Most Sundanese student had capable to form an argument with a simple justification; student’ OAS better than WAS relatively; and other  result of this study shows that no argumentation skills significance difference between boys and girl. The findings suggest several factors influencing Sundanese student’ argumentation skills such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, student’ role in family, the language ability to articulate ideas, and  cultural influences. Methodological issues arising from the study and implications for teaching and assessment are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BIODIDAKTIKA: JURNAL BIOLOGI DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BIODIDAKTIKA: JURNAL BIOLOGI DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30870/BIODIDAKTIKA.V11I2.1585\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BIODIDAKTIKA: JURNAL BIOLOGI DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30870/BIODIDAKTIKA.V11I2.1585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要本个案研究旨在探讨巽他高中11年级学生基于性别和家庭照顾模式的社会科学议题辩论技巧。具体而言,本质性研究探讨了巽他学生在论证过程中的主张形成和证据提供的质量。给44名11年级学生发放了研究工具,使用论证作业表获取学生的书面论证技能(WAS)数据;采用半结构化访谈法获取学生口头论证技能(OAS)数据;采用问卷调查和访谈法获取家庭关爱模式和家庭性别意识数据;此外,利用野外笔记作为数据三角测量工具。学生的论证能力是通过基于四量表的论证来确定的。采用归纳分析方法对数据进行检验。大多数巽他学生有能力用一个简单的理由来形成一个论点;学生的OAS相对优于WAS;本研究的其他结果显示,男生和女生的辩论技巧没有显著差异。研究结果表明,有几个因素会影响巽他语学生的辩论技巧,如家庭生活中意见形成的自由、学生在家庭中的角色、表达思想的语言能力和文化影响。本研究所产生的方法问题,以及对教学和评估的影响,将会被讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
STUDI TENTANG KETERAMPILAN PEMBENTUKAN KLAIM MENGENAI ISU SOSIO-SAINTIFIK SISWA SEKOLAH MENENGAH ATAS PADA KELOMPOK BUDAYA SUNDA
ABSTRACT This case study purposes to investigate Sundanese high school student 11th grade argumentation skills about socio-scientific issue based on gender and family caring pattern. Specifically, this qualitative research explores the quality of Sundanese student’ claim-forming and evidence-supplying in an argumentation process. Research instrument were given to 44 year-11 students, argumentation worksheets were used to get student’ written argumentation skills (WAS) data; semi-structured interview were used to get student’ oral argumentation skills (OAS) data; questionnaire and interview were used to get family caring pattern and family gender awareness data; furthermore, field note were used as data triangulation tool. Student’ argumentation skills were determined by justification of argument based on four-scale rubric. Inductive analysis was used to examine the data. Most Sundanese student had capable to form an argument with a simple justification; student’ OAS better than WAS relatively; and other  result of this study shows that no argumentation skills significance difference between boys and girl. The findings suggest several factors influencing Sundanese student’ argumentation skills such as freedom of opinion-forming in family life, student’ role in family, the language ability to articulate ideas, and  cultural influences. Methodological issues arising from the study and implications for teaching and assessment are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信