{"title":"主论证的三值方法","authors":"S. Akama, Y. Nagata","doi":"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Master Argument due to Diodorus Cronos claims that nothing is possible that neither is true nor will be true and that therefore every (present) possibility must be realized at a present or future time. Unfortunately, it leads to logical determinism. In this paper, based on Prior's insight, a three-valued approach to the Master Argument is presented by developing a three-valued modal tense logic with a Kripke semantics. We also discuss philosophical and logical issues in connection with other approaches.","PeriodicalId":234611,"journal":{"name":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Three-Valued Approach to the Master Argument\",\"authors\":\"S. Akama, Y. Nagata\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISMVL.2011.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Master Argument due to Diodorus Cronos claims that nothing is possible that neither is true nor will be true and that therefore every (present) possibility must be realized at a present or future time. Unfortunately, it leads to logical determinism. In this paper, based on Prior's insight, a three-valued approach to the Master Argument is presented by developing a three-valued modal tense logic with a Kripke semantics. We also discuss philosophical and logical issues in connection with other approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 41st IEEE International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2011.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Master Argument due to Diodorus Cronos claims that nothing is possible that neither is true nor will be true and that therefore every (present) possibility must be realized at a present or future time. Unfortunately, it leads to logical determinism. In this paper, based on Prior's insight, a three-valued approach to the Master Argument is presented by developing a three-valued modal tense logic with a Kripke semantics. We also discuss philosophical and logical issues in connection with other approaches.