自适应波束形成技术在海洋环境噪声地球声反演中的应用

L. Muzi, M. Siderius, J. Gebbie, J. Paddock
{"title":"自适应波束形成技术在海洋环境噪声地球声反演中的应用","authors":"L. Muzi, M. Siderius, J. Gebbie, J. Paddock","doi":"10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.","PeriodicalId":363534,"journal":{"name":"OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise\",\"authors\":\"L. Muzi, M. Siderius, J. Gebbie, J. Paddock\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":363534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OCEANS 2010 MTS/IEEE SEATTLE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OCEANS.2010.5664300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

我们解释了最小方差无失真响应波束成波束器在应用于海洋环境噪声地球声反演的一种特殊技术时表现不佳的原因。已有研究表明,利用Bartlett波束原可以估计出反射损耗(RL)作为频率和掠射角的函数,并利用它来估计海底地声参数。尽管MVDR波束成形器在到达方向估计方面具有优越的性能,但其RL估计结果不如Bartlett波束成形器可靠。两种波束形成器之间的一个重要区别在于,两个观测方向±φ的MVDR波束模式可以明显不同,而Bartlett波束模式相对于侧面观测方向总是对称的。通过从模拟声场估计RL,我们首先提出了一种量化和可视化非对称性的方法,然后表明它是导致基于mvdr的RL估计异常的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the use of adaptive beam forming techniques for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise
We provide an explanation for the poor performance of the minimum-variance distortionless-response (MVDR) beam former when applied to one particular technique for geoacoustic inversion of marine ambient noise. Previous studies have shown that using the Bartlett beam former one can estimate the reflection loss (RL) as a function of frequency and grazing angle, and use it to estimate the seabed geoacoustic parameters. Despite its superior performance in direction-of-arrival estimation, the MVDR beam former's results for RL estimation are less reliable than those yielded by the Bartlett beam former. One important difference between the two beam formers lies in the fact that the MVDR beam patterns for the two look directions ±φ can be markedly different, whereas the Bartlett beam patterns are always symmetric with respect to the broadside look direction. By estimating the RL from simulated acoustic fields we first present a method of quantifying and visualizing the asymmetry, and then show that it is responsible for the anomalies in the MVDR-based RL estimate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信