2010年英国大选期间领导人访问的有效性

IF 2.1 2区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Alia Middleton
{"title":"2010年英国大选期间领导人访问的有效性","authors":"Alia Middleton","doi":"10.1111/1467-856X.12061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>This article shows\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>The impact of leader visits on local results in general election campaigns.</li>\n \n <li>The importance of party leaders in contemporary election campaigns.</li>\n \n <li>That leader visits impact vote share but not turnout.</li>\n \n <li>The extent to which incumbency plays an important part in leader visit effectiveness.</li>\n </ul>\n <p>The leaders of the three largest political parties in the UK spent a significant proportion of the 2010 general election campaign touring constituencies. However, the potential impact of such visits upon local party vote share and constituency turnout has remained relatively unstudied. This article, using original data collected in 2010, is the first to examine leader visits during UK election campaigns. The constituencies visited are typically marginal, and while Gordon Brown mostly limited his visits to Labour-held constituencies, the leaders of the other two parties ran more expansionist visit strategies. Exploring the ability of leader visits to affect turnout and vote share, the analysis shows that visits made no impact on local turnout, but the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats received a boost in vote share in constituencies when their leaders visited. Disaggregating this further, these boosts were received primarily in seats held by Labour prior to the election.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51479,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","volume":"17 2","pages":"244-259"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12061","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effectiveness of Leader Visits during the 2010 British General Election Campaign\",\"authors\":\"Alia Middleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-856X.12061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>This article shows\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>The impact of leader visits on local results in general election campaigns.</li>\\n \\n <li>The importance of party leaders in contemporary election campaigns.</li>\\n \\n <li>That leader visits impact vote share but not turnout.</li>\\n \\n <li>The extent to which incumbency plays an important part in leader visit effectiveness.</li>\\n </ul>\\n <p>The leaders of the three largest political parties in the UK spent a significant proportion of the 2010 general election campaign touring constituencies. However, the potential impact of such visits upon local party vote share and constituency turnout has remained relatively unstudied. This article, using original data collected in 2010, is the first to examine leader visits during UK election campaigns. The constituencies visited are typically marginal, and while Gordon Brown mostly limited his visits to Labour-held constituencies, the leaders of the other two parties ran more expansionist visit strategies. Exploring the ability of leader visits to affect turnout and vote share, the analysis shows that visits made no impact on local turnout, but the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats received a boost in vote share in constituencies when their leaders visited. Disaggregating this further, these boosts were received primarily in seats held by Labour prior to the election.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51479,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"244-259\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/1467-856X.12061\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Politics & International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12061\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Politics & International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-856X.12061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

这篇文章展示了领导人访问对地方大选结果的影响。政党领袖在当代竞选活动中的重要性。领导人的访问会影响选票份额,但不会影响投票率。在职程度在领导拜访效能中扮演重要角色。英国三大政党的领导人在2010年大选期间花了相当大的一部分时间巡视选区。然而,这种访问对地方政党投票份额和选区投票率的潜在影响仍然相对没有研究。本文使用2010年收集的原始数据,首次考察了英国大选期间领导人的访问。访问的选区通常是边缘选区,而戈登•布朗(Gordon Brown)的访问大多局限于工党控制的选区,而其他两个政党的领导人则采取了更具扩张性的访问策略。在探讨领导人访问对投票率和得票率的影响时,分析表明,访问对地方投票率没有影响,但保守党和自由民主党的领导人访问时,他们在选区的得票率有所提高。进一步分析,这些提升主要来自工党在选举前占据的席位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effectiveness of Leader Visits during the 2010 British General Election Campaign

This article shows

  • The impact of leader visits on local results in general election campaigns.
  • The importance of party leaders in contemporary election campaigns.
  • That leader visits impact vote share but not turnout.
  • The extent to which incumbency plays an important part in leader visit effectiveness.

The leaders of the three largest political parties in the UK spent a significant proportion of the 2010 general election campaign touring constituencies. However, the potential impact of such visits upon local party vote share and constituency turnout has remained relatively unstudied. This article, using original data collected in 2010, is the first to examine leader visits during UK election campaigns. The constituencies visited are typically marginal, and while Gordon Brown mostly limited his visits to Labour-held constituencies, the leaders of the other two parties ran more expansionist visit strategies. Exploring the ability of leader visits to affect turnout and vote share, the analysis shows that visits made no impact on local turnout, but the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats received a boost in vote share in constituencies when their leaders visited. Disaggregating this further, these boosts were received primarily in seats held by Labour prior to the election.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: BJPIR provides an outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain Founded in 1999, BJPIR is now based in the School of Politics at the University of Nottingham. It is a major refereed journal published by Blackwell Publishing under the auspices of the Political Studies Association of the United Kingdom. BJPIR is committed to acting as a broadly-based outlet for the best of British political science and of political science on Britain. A fully refereed journal, it publishes topical, scholarly work on significant debates in British scholarship and on all major political issues affecting Britain"s relationship to Europe and the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信