人体静电放电火花电阻公式的进一步验证

Y. Taka, O. Fujiwara
{"title":"人体静电放电火花电阻公式的进一步验证","authors":"Y. Taka, O. Fujiwara","doi":"10.1109/EMCZUR.2009.4783473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Micro-gap electrostatic discharge (ESD) events due to a human with charge voltages below 1000 V cause serious malfunctions in high-tech information devices. For clarifying such a mechanism, it is indispensable to grasp the spark process of such micro-gap ESDs. For this purpose, two types of spark-resistance laws proposed by Rompe-Weizel and Toepler have often been used, which were derived from the hypotheses that spark conductivity be proportional to the internal energy and charge injected into a spark channel, respectively. However, their validity has not well been investigated. To examine which spark-resistance formula could be applied for human ESDs, with a 12-GHz digital oscilloscope, we previously measured the discharge currents through the hand-held metal piece from a charged human with respect to charged voltages of 200 V and 2000 V, and thereby derived the conductance of a spark gap to reveal that both of their hypotheses are roughly valid in the initial stage of sparks. In this study, to further validate the above spark hypotheses, we derived the discharge voltages in closed forms across a spark gap based on the spark-resistance formulae, and compared them with the estimated results from the measured discharge currents. As a result, we found that Rompe-Weizel's formula could well explain initial spark process than Toepler's one regardless of charge voltages.","PeriodicalId":192851,"journal":{"name":"2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Further Validation of Spark-Resistance Formula Applied for Human ESD\",\"authors\":\"Y. Taka, O. Fujiwara\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMCZUR.2009.4783473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Micro-gap electrostatic discharge (ESD) events due to a human with charge voltages below 1000 V cause serious malfunctions in high-tech information devices. For clarifying such a mechanism, it is indispensable to grasp the spark process of such micro-gap ESDs. For this purpose, two types of spark-resistance laws proposed by Rompe-Weizel and Toepler have often been used, which were derived from the hypotheses that spark conductivity be proportional to the internal energy and charge injected into a spark channel, respectively. However, their validity has not well been investigated. To examine which spark-resistance formula could be applied for human ESDs, with a 12-GHz digital oscilloscope, we previously measured the discharge currents through the hand-held metal piece from a charged human with respect to charged voltages of 200 V and 2000 V, and thereby derived the conductance of a spark gap to reveal that both of their hypotheses are roughly valid in the initial stage of sparks. In this study, to further validate the above spark hypotheses, we derived the discharge voltages in closed forms across a spark gap based on the spark-resistance formulae, and compared them with the estimated results from the measured discharge currents. As a result, we found that Rompe-Weizel's formula could well explain initial spark process than Toepler's one regardless of charge voltages.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCZUR.2009.4783473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 20th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCZUR.2009.4783473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在高技术信息设备中,当充电电压低于1000v时,人为微间隙静电放电(ESD)事件会导致严重的故障。为了弄清这一机理,掌握微间隙静电放电的放电过程是必不可少的。为此,经常使用Rompe-Weizel和Toepler提出的两种类型的火花电阻定律,它们分别来自于火花电导率与注入火花通道的内能和电荷成正比的假设。然而,它们的有效性还没有得到很好的调查。为了检验哪一个火花电阻公式可以应用于人体esd,我们之前用一个12 ghz数字示波器,测量了一个带电的人在200 V和2000 V的充电电压下通过手持金属片的放电电流,从而得出了火花间隙的电导,从而揭示了他们的两个假设在火花的初始阶段大致有效。在本研究中,为了进一步验证上述火花假设,我们根据火花电阻公式推导出了火花间隙上闭合形式的放电电压,并将其与实测放电电流的估计结果进行了比较。结果发现,无论充电电压如何,Rompe-Weizel公式比Toepler公式更能解释初始火花过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Further Validation of Spark-Resistance Formula Applied for Human ESD
Micro-gap electrostatic discharge (ESD) events due to a human with charge voltages below 1000 V cause serious malfunctions in high-tech information devices. For clarifying such a mechanism, it is indispensable to grasp the spark process of such micro-gap ESDs. For this purpose, two types of spark-resistance laws proposed by Rompe-Weizel and Toepler have often been used, which were derived from the hypotheses that spark conductivity be proportional to the internal energy and charge injected into a spark channel, respectively. However, their validity has not well been investigated. To examine which spark-resistance formula could be applied for human ESDs, with a 12-GHz digital oscilloscope, we previously measured the discharge currents through the hand-held metal piece from a charged human with respect to charged voltages of 200 V and 2000 V, and thereby derived the conductance of a spark gap to reveal that both of their hypotheses are roughly valid in the initial stage of sparks. In this study, to further validate the above spark hypotheses, we derived the discharge voltages in closed forms across a spark gap based on the spark-resistance formulae, and compared them with the estimated results from the measured discharge currents. As a result, we found that Rompe-Weizel's formula could well explain initial spark process than Toepler's one regardless of charge voltages.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信