当地社区在挪威和爱沙尼亚有争议的遗产话语中的作用

Ave Paulus, Arnstein Bard Brekke
{"title":"当地社区在挪威和爱沙尼亚有争议的遗产话语中的作用","authors":"Ave Paulus, Arnstein Bard Brekke","doi":"10.35784/odk.2939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current paper analyses the paradigm shifts in the discourse of heritage sites with tragic personal stories, memories, and remains, emphasising local communities' role in reframing controversial heritage in Norway and Estonia. Although these stories are from different cultures and places, they all spin around the same - how do we deal with the most delicate strings in the human mind, beliefs, sorrows, and dignity. The sites under discussion are \"ghosts\" of the tragedies of the past century. Among heritage communities, states and experts, there were intense debates about the values and fate of those areas. Besides several historical, political and socioeconomic issues, personal wounds were reconciled. The first case describes the heritage communities' initiatives in accessing and reconciling values of contested Cold War heritage  - Suurpea Naval Base erected during Soviet Occupation and deportations on the coasts of Estonia. The second case deals with the initial demolition and later recognition of Sami burial sites and sacred landscapes of Arctic Norway, re-gaining the rights to Saami heritage and restitution. These cases highlight the importance of inclusiveness while dealing with conflicting histories, reconciliation, restitution, and dignity of heritage and communities concerned. Authors rely on a holistic concept of cultural heritage. Cultural communities, spirit and feeling of their presence are essential indicators of character and sense of place. The authors show the benefits of a people-centred approach towards heritage as the basis of transformative change in heritage protection. The authors` positions are not purely academic – they have been involved in defining and protecting the cultural heritage of the areas under discussion. \nKeywords: cultural heritage, heritage communities, sociocultural accessibility, inclusiveness, restitution, reconciliation","PeriodicalId":273645,"journal":{"name":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","volume":"398 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Local Communities in the Discourse of Controversial Heritage of Norway and Estonia\",\"authors\":\"Ave Paulus, Arnstein Bard Brekke\",\"doi\":\"10.35784/odk.2939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current paper analyses the paradigm shifts in the discourse of heritage sites with tragic personal stories, memories, and remains, emphasising local communities' role in reframing controversial heritage in Norway and Estonia. Although these stories are from different cultures and places, they all spin around the same - how do we deal with the most delicate strings in the human mind, beliefs, sorrows, and dignity. The sites under discussion are \\\"ghosts\\\" of the tragedies of the past century. Among heritage communities, states and experts, there were intense debates about the values and fate of those areas. Besides several historical, political and socioeconomic issues, personal wounds were reconciled. The first case describes the heritage communities' initiatives in accessing and reconciling values of contested Cold War heritage  - Suurpea Naval Base erected during Soviet Occupation and deportations on the coasts of Estonia. The second case deals with the initial demolition and later recognition of Sami burial sites and sacred landscapes of Arctic Norway, re-gaining the rights to Saami heritage and restitution. These cases highlight the importance of inclusiveness while dealing with conflicting histories, reconciliation, restitution, and dignity of heritage and communities concerned. Authors rely on a holistic concept of cultural heritage. Cultural communities, spirit and feeling of their presence are essential indicators of character and sense of place. The authors show the benefits of a people-centred approach towards heritage as the basis of transformative change in heritage protection. The authors` positions are not purely academic – they have been involved in defining and protecting the cultural heritage of the areas under discussion. \\nKeywords: cultural heritage, heritage communities, sociocultural accessibility, inclusiveness, restitution, reconciliation\",\"PeriodicalId\":273645,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Protection of Cultural Heritage\",\"volume\":\"398 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Protection of Cultural Heritage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Protection of Cultural Heritage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35784/odk.2939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当前的论文分析了具有悲剧性个人故事、记忆和遗迹的遗产遗址话语中的范式转变,强调了当地社区在重塑挪威和爱沙尼亚有争议的遗产中的作用。虽然这些故事来自不同的文化和地方,但它们都围绕着同一个主题——我们如何处理人类心灵中最微妙的心弦,信仰、悲伤和尊严。这些被讨论的遗址是上个世纪悲剧的“幽灵”。在遗产社区、各州和专家之间,围绕这些地区的价值和命运展开了激烈的辩论。除了一些历史、政治和社会经济问题,个人的创伤也得到了和解。第一个案例描述了遗产社区在获取和协调有争议的冷战遗产价值方面的举措-苏联占领和驱逐爱沙尼亚海岸期间建立的Suurpea海军基地。第二个案件涉及最初拆除萨米人墓地和挪威北极的神圣景观,后来承认萨米人的遗产和恢复权利。这些案例突出了在处理相互冲突的历史、和解、恢复以及有关遗产和社区的尊严时包容的重要性。作者依赖于文化遗产的整体概念。文化社区、精神和他们的存在感是性格和地方感的基本指标。这组作者展示了以人为本的遗产处理方法作为遗产保护变革基础的好处。这两位作者的立场并不纯粹是学术性的——他们参与了确定和保护正在讨论的地区的文化遗产。关键词:文化遗产、遗产社区、社会文化可及性、包容性、复原、和解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Local Communities in the Discourse of Controversial Heritage of Norway and Estonia
The current paper analyses the paradigm shifts in the discourse of heritage sites with tragic personal stories, memories, and remains, emphasising local communities' role in reframing controversial heritage in Norway and Estonia. Although these stories are from different cultures and places, they all spin around the same - how do we deal with the most delicate strings in the human mind, beliefs, sorrows, and dignity. The sites under discussion are "ghosts" of the tragedies of the past century. Among heritage communities, states and experts, there were intense debates about the values and fate of those areas. Besides several historical, political and socioeconomic issues, personal wounds were reconciled. The first case describes the heritage communities' initiatives in accessing and reconciling values of contested Cold War heritage  - Suurpea Naval Base erected during Soviet Occupation and deportations on the coasts of Estonia. The second case deals with the initial demolition and later recognition of Sami burial sites and sacred landscapes of Arctic Norway, re-gaining the rights to Saami heritage and restitution. These cases highlight the importance of inclusiveness while dealing with conflicting histories, reconciliation, restitution, and dignity of heritage and communities concerned. Authors rely on a holistic concept of cultural heritage. Cultural communities, spirit and feeling of their presence are essential indicators of character and sense of place. The authors show the benefits of a people-centred approach towards heritage as the basis of transformative change in heritage protection. The authors` positions are not purely academic – they have been involved in defining and protecting the cultural heritage of the areas under discussion. Keywords: cultural heritage, heritage communities, sociocultural accessibility, inclusiveness, restitution, reconciliation
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信