被授权官员拘留在一个人的家中或其他财产:当前的理论和实践问题

A. Vozniuk, Alyona Duda
{"title":"被授权官员拘留在一个人的家中或其他财产:当前的理论和实践问题","authors":"A. Vozniuk, Alyona Duda","doi":"10.56215/01211214.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of the article is to analyze problematic issues of the criminal procedure for detention in housing or other property of a person and the formation on this basis of scientifically sound recommendations for improving existing legislation and practice of its application. Methodology. The article uses a set of scientific methods, namely: terminological, system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. The theoretical basis of the study are the works of Ukrainian scientists, the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) of Ukraine, as well as the practice of its application. The scientific novelty of the article is that it highlights the features of detention of a person who is in the home or other property of a person, formulates recommendations for the application of the relevant provisions of the CPC of Ukraine in practice, and identifies areas for improving criminal procedural law. actions. Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, a set of proposals aimed at improving the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine regulating the procedure for detention in housing or other property and the practice of their use, in particular: 1) necessary grounds for both intrusion and detention in a person’s home or other property, as in fact these are different procedural actions; 2) in case of detention by an authorized official without the decision of the investigating judge, court, physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by all police officers in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On National Police”, as well as other law enforcement officers. drawing up a detention report, only the investigator, prosecutor has the right (given the above provisions of the CPC of Ukraine need clarification by a clear delineation of detention, which includes the full range of measures from physical detention to drawing up a protocol and physical detention); 3) Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine should provide for the provision that physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by law enforcement officers, in the presence of legal grounds specified in Part 1 of Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine, and procedurally formalize these actions can only authorized officials – investigator, prosecutor; 4) at the legislative level, it is advisable to provide for the possibility of detention on suspicion of committing a criminal offense before entering data into the Unified Registry of Investigations; 5) it is necessary to expand the emergencies provided for in Part.3 of Art. 233 of the CPC of Ukraine, by granting the right to the investigator, investigator, prosecutor to decide on the decision of the investigating judge to enter the home or other property of a person in urgent cases involving detention of a suspect, accused in order to get him to participate in the consideration of the request for the application of a measure of restraint in the form of detention","PeriodicalId":111799,"journal":{"name":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detention by an Authorized Official in a Person’s Home or Other Property: Current Issues of Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"A. Vozniuk, Alyona Duda\",\"doi\":\"10.56215/01211214.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of the article is to analyze problematic issues of the criminal procedure for detention in housing or other property of a person and the formation on this basis of scientifically sound recommendations for improving existing legislation and practice of its application. Methodology. The article uses a set of scientific methods, namely: terminological, system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. The theoretical basis of the study are the works of Ukrainian scientists, the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) of Ukraine, as well as the practice of its application. The scientific novelty of the article is that it highlights the features of detention of a person who is in the home or other property of a person, formulates recommendations for the application of the relevant provisions of the CPC of Ukraine in practice, and identifies areas for improving criminal procedural law. actions. Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, a set of proposals aimed at improving the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine regulating the procedure for detention in housing or other property and the practice of their use, in particular: 1) necessary grounds for both intrusion and detention in a person’s home or other property, as in fact these are different procedural actions; 2) in case of detention by an authorized official without the decision of the investigating judge, court, physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by all police officers in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On National Police”, as well as other law enforcement officers. drawing up a detention report, only the investigator, prosecutor has the right (given the above provisions of the CPC of Ukraine need clarification by a clear delineation of detention, which includes the full range of measures from physical detention to drawing up a protocol and physical detention); 3) Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine should provide for the provision that physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by law enforcement officers, in the presence of legal grounds specified in Part 1 of Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine, and procedurally formalize these actions can only authorized officials – investigator, prosecutor; 4) at the legislative level, it is advisable to provide for the possibility of detention on suspicion of committing a criminal offense before entering data into the Unified Registry of Investigations; 5) it is necessary to expand the emergencies provided for in Part.3 of Art. 233 of the CPC of Ukraine, by granting the right to the investigator, investigator, prosecutor to decide on the decision of the investigating judge to enter the home or other property of a person in urgent cases involving detention of a suspect, accused in order to get him to participate in the consideration of the request for the application of a measure of restraint in the form of detention\",\"PeriodicalId\":111799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"volume\":\"127 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章的目的是分析在住房或其他财产中拘留一个人的刑事诉讼程序中存在的问题,并在此基础上提出科学合理的建议,以改进现有立法及其适用的做法。方法。本文运用了一套科学的方法,即术语学、系统结构学、形式逻辑学、比较法学。研究的理论依据是乌克兰科学家的研究成果、乌克兰刑事诉讼法的规定及其适用实践。该条的科学新颖之处在于,它突出了在一个人的家中或其他财产中拘留一个人的特点,提出了在实践中适用乌克兰《刑事诉讼法》有关规定的建议,并确定了改进刑事诉讼法的领域。行动。结论。根据这项研究的结果,提出了一套建议,旨在改进乌克兰《方案法》关于在住房或其他财产中拘留的程序及其使用的规定,特别是:1)闯入和拘留一个人的住宅或其他财产的必要理由,因为实际上这是不同的程序行动;2)在未经调查法官、法院决定而被授权官员拘留的情况下,根据乌克兰《国家警察法》,所有警察以及其他执法人员可以实施人身拘留或命令拘留。起草一份拘留报告,只有调查人员、检察官才有权利(鉴于乌克兰方案委员会的上述规定需要通过明确界定拘留加以澄清,其中包括从实物拘留到起草议定书和实物拘留的全部措施);3)乌克兰共产党第208条应规定,在存在乌克兰共产党第208条第1部分规定的法律理由的情况下,执法人员可实施人身拘留或命令拘留,并在程序上正式确定这些行动只能授权官员- -调查员、检察官;4)在立法层面,建议在向统一调查登记局输入数据之前,规定可能因涉嫌犯罪而被拘留;5)有必要扩大紧急情况规定Part.3艺术。233年中国共产党的乌克兰,通过给予正确的侦探,侦探,检察官决定调查法官的决定进入一个人的家里或其他财产的紧急案件拘留嫌疑人,指责为了让他参与为应用程序请求的考虑测量的约束形式的拘留
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detention by an Authorized Official in a Person’s Home or Other Property: Current Issues of Theory and Practice
The purpose of the article is to analyze problematic issues of the criminal procedure for detention in housing or other property of a person and the formation on this basis of scientifically sound recommendations for improving existing legislation and practice of its application. Methodology. The article uses a set of scientific methods, namely: terminological, system-structural, formal-logical, comparative-legal. The theoretical basis of the study are the works of Ukrainian scientists, the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) of Ukraine, as well as the practice of its application. The scientific novelty of the article is that it highlights the features of detention of a person who is in the home or other property of a person, formulates recommendations for the application of the relevant provisions of the CPC of Ukraine in practice, and identifies areas for improving criminal procedural law. actions. Conclusions. Based on the results of the study, a set of proposals aimed at improving the provisions of the CPC of Ukraine regulating the procedure for detention in housing or other property and the practice of their use, in particular: 1) necessary grounds for both intrusion and detention in a person’s home or other property, as in fact these are different procedural actions; 2) in case of detention by an authorized official without the decision of the investigating judge, court, physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by all police officers in accordance with the Law of Ukraine “On National Police”, as well as other law enforcement officers. drawing up a detention report, only the investigator, prosecutor has the right (given the above provisions of the CPC of Ukraine need clarification by a clear delineation of detention, which includes the full range of measures from physical detention to drawing up a protocol and physical detention); 3) Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine should provide for the provision that physical detention or detention by order may be carried out by law enforcement officers, in the presence of legal grounds specified in Part 1 of Art. 208 of the CPC of Ukraine, and procedurally formalize these actions can only authorized officials – investigator, prosecutor; 4) at the legislative level, it is advisable to provide for the possibility of detention on suspicion of committing a criminal offense before entering data into the Unified Registry of Investigations; 5) it is necessary to expand the emergencies provided for in Part.3 of Art. 233 of the CPC of Ukraine, by granting the right to the investigator, investigator, prosecutor to decide on the decision of the investigating judge to enter the home or other property of a person in urgent cases involving detention of a suspect, accused in order to get him to participate in the consideration of the request for the application of a measure of restraint in the form of detention
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信