乌克兰金融深度与经济增长的关系

Yuliia Shapoval, P. Kerimov, Oleksii Shpanel-Yukhta, S. Korablin, Y. Bublyk, S. Brus
{"title":"乌克兰金融深度与经济增长的关系","authors":"Yuliia Shapoval, P. Kerimov, Oleksii Shpanel-Yukhta, S. Korablin, Y. Bublyk, S. Brus","doi":"10.15587/978-617-7319-61-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The book is devoted to the debate on the nature and direction of the relationship between financial depth and economic growth. Addressing the theoretical underpinnings of financial depth, namely the concept, measurement approaches, benefits and drawbacks, and determinants (focusing on the institutional environment) provides insights on prior studies on its relationship with economic growth before and after the GFC. This demonstrates the changes in the nature of the financial depth and economic growth nexus in the context of: the direct-proportional relationship between them, to a weakening and, in some cases, to the opposite influence. Drawing from the trends of economic development and of financial depth worldwide, distinctions across groups of countries by income and Ukraine are identified. The quantitative analysis of Ukraine’s financial depth across assets, liabilities, volumes of services of non-bank and capital market, state debt and lending (of state banks, state investment projects, local loans, and cooperation with IOFs) demonstrates sectoral unbalanced financial deepening of the economy. It is grounded that financial depth, debt burden and economic growth move synchronously or in different directions based on business cycle phases. The estimation of bank loans’ impact on economic growth, provided by evaluating the financial performance of Ukrainian industrial firms during 2006–2020, shows bank loans substitution by commercial (inter-firm) credit; preference for short-term loans denominated in the national currency; sufficient profitability to service loans only of mining industry firms; quasi-risky financing model. Further, the book proposes an empirical study of Ukraine's financial depth-economic growth nexus, revealing that the financial depth just accompanies economic growth but not causes it. During 2008–2020, the impact of bank and non-bank loans was negative, while the impact of trading volume on the securities market was positive, indicating the inability of further credit expansion to contribute to economic growth. Though economic growth has a directly proportionated correlation with external trade and debt, the correlation between mentioned factors and financial depth is inversely proportionate. Meanwhile, the relationship between financial openness and financial deepening in Ukraine is confirmed. The study concludes with an analysis of the impact of war on the financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine. This book is a must-read for researchers, scholars, and policy-makers interested in a better understanding of the economic growth and financial development of Ukraine alike.","PeriodicalId":206442,"journal":{"name":"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine\",\"authors\":\"Yuliia Shapoval, P. Kerimov, Oleksii Shpanel-Yukhta, S. Korablin, Y. Bublyk, S. Brus\",\"doi\":\"10.15587/978-617-7319-61-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The book is devoted to the debate on the nature and direction of the relationship between financial depth and economic growth. Addressing the theoretical underpinnings of financial depth, namely the concept, measurement approaches, benefits and drawbacks, and determinants (focusing on the institutional environment) provides insights on prior studies on its relationship with economic growth before and after the GFC. This demonstrates the changes in the nature of the financial depth and economic growth nexus in the context of: the direct-proportional relationship between them, to a weakening and, in some cases, to the opposite influence. Drawing from the trends of economic development and of financial depth worldwide, distinctions across groups of countries by income and Ukraine are identified. The quantitative analysis of Ukraine’s financial depth across assets, liabilities, volumes of services of non-bank and capital market, state debt and lending (of state banks, state investment projects, local loans, and cooperation with IOFs) demonstrates sectoral unbalanced financial deepening of the economy. It is grounded that financial depth, debt burden and economic growth move synchronously or in different directions based on business cycle phases. The estimation of bank loans’ impact on economic growth, provided by evaluating the financial performance of Ukrainian industrial firms during 2006–2020, shows bank loans substitution by commercial (inter-firm) credit; preference for short-term loans denominated in the national currency; sufficient profitability to service loans only of mining industry firms; quasi-risky financing model. Further, the book proposes an empirical study of Ukraine's financial depth-economic growth nexus, revealing that the financial depth just accompanies economic growth but not causes it. During 2008–2020, the impact of bank and non-bank loans was negative, while the impact of trading volume on the securities market was positive, indicating the inability of further credit expansion to contribute to economic growth. Though economic growth has a directly proportionated correlation with external trade and debt, the correlation between mentioned factors and financial depth is inversely proportionate. Meanwhile, the relationship between financial openness and financial deepening in Ukraine is confirmed. The study concludes with an analysis of the impact of war on the financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine. This book is a must-read for researchers, scholars, and policy-makers interested in a better understanding of the economic growth and financial development of Ukraine alike.\",\"PeriodicalId\":206442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-7319-61-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Problems of Innovation and Investment Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15587/978-617-7319-61-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本书致力于讨论金融深度与经济增长之间关系的本质和方向。解决金融深度的理论基础,即概念、测量方法、利弊和决定因素(重点关注制度环境),为全球金融危机前后金融深度与经济增长关系的先前研究提供了见解。这表明,在金融深度和经济增长之间的直接正比关系的背景下,金融深度和经济增长之间的关系的性质发生了变化,影响减弱,在某些情况下,影响相反。根据全球经济发展和金融深度的趋势,确定了按收入和乌克兰划分的国家集团之间的差异。乌克兰金融深度的量化分析包括资产、负债、非银行和资本市场的服务量、国家债务和贷款(国有银行、国家投资项目、地方贷款以及与国际金融机构的合作),表明经济的部门金融深化不平衡。其基础是金融深度、债务负担和经济增长根据经济周期阶段同步或不同方向运动。通过评估2006-2020年乌克兰工业企业的财务业绩,对银行贷款对经济增长影响的估计显示,商业(企业间)信贷替代了银行贷款;优先考虑以本国货币计价的短期贷款;只有矿业公司有足够的盈利能力偿还贷款;准风险融资模式。此外,本文还对乌克兰金融深度与经济增长的关系进行了实证研究,发现金融深度只是伴随经济增长而非导致经济增长。2008-2020年期间,银行和非银行贷款的影响为负,而交易量对证券市场的影响为正,表明信贷进一步扩张无法对经济增长做出贡献。虽然经济增长与对外贸易和债务呈正比关系,但上述因素与金融深度之间的相关关系呈反比关系。同时,也证实了乌克兰金融开放与金融深化之间的关系。该研究最后分析了战争对乌克兰金融深度-经济增长关系的影响。对于想要更好地了解乌克兰经济增长和金融发展的研究人员、学者和政策制定者来说,本书是一本必读的书。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine
The book is devoted to the debate on the nature and direction of the relationship between financial depth and economic growth. Addressing the theoretical underpinnings of financial depth, namely the concept, measurement approaches, benefits and drawbacks, and determinants (focusing on the institutional environment) provides insights on prior studies on its relationship with economic growth before and after the GFC. This demonstrates the changes in the nature of the financial depth and economic growth nexus in the context of: the direct-proportional relationship between them, to a weakening and, in some cases, to the opposite influence. Drawing from the trends of economic development and of financial depth worldwide, distinctions across groups of countries by income and Ukraine are identified. The quantitative analysis of Ukraine’s financial depth across assets, liabilities, volumes of services of non-bank and capital market, state debt and lending (of state banks, state investment projects, local loans, and cooperation with IOFs) demonstrates sectoral unbalanced financial deepening of the economy. It is grounded that financial depth, debt burden and economic growth move synchronously or in different directions based on business cycle phases. The estimation of bank loans’ impact on economic growth, provided by evaluating the financial performance of Ukrainian industrial firms during 2006–2020, shows bank loans substitution by commercial (inter-firm) credit; preference for short-term loans denominated in the national currency; sufficient profitability to service loans only of mining industry firms; quasi-risky financing model. Further, the book proposes an empirical study of Ukraine's financial depth-economic growth nexus, revealing that the financial depth just accompanies economic growth but not causes it. During 2008–2020, the impact of bank and non-bank loans was negative, while the impact of trading volume on the securities market was positive, indicating the inability of further credit expansion to contribute to economic growth. Though economic growth has a directly proportionated correlation with external trade and debt, the correlation between mentioned factors and financial depth is inversely proportionate. Meanwhile, the relationship between financial openness and financial deepening in Ukraine is confirmed. The study concludes with an analysis of the impact of war on the financial depth-economic growth nexus in Ukraine. This book is a must-read for researchers, scholars, and policy-makers interested in a better understanding of the economic growth and financial development of Ukraine alike.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信