短期降雨强度分析中伯努利分布参数两种估计的比较评价

M. Asani, Adesola Oke
{"title":"短期降雨强度分析中伯努利分布参数两种估计的比较评价","authors":"M. Asani, Adesola Oke","doi":"10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i2.946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents an application of the maximum likelihood method and the Bernoulli distribution of selected rainfall intensity data. The parameter of the density of Bernoulli distribution was estimated by the maximum likelihood method (MLM), and Microsoft Excel Solver (MES). The calculated probabilities using the estimated parameter were evaluated statistically (analysis of variance (ANOVA), relative error, model of' selection criterion (MSC), Coefficient of Determination (CD) and Correlation coefficient (R). The study revealed that the Bernoulli probability distribution’s parameter (p) is the mean of the natural logarithm of rainfall intensity using the MLM estimator. The parameter were 0.665 and 0.535 for Makurdi, 0.695 and 0.478 for Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The relative errors were 0.479 and 0.743, and 1.141 and 1.509 for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The correlation coefficient for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES were 0.876 and 0.800, and 0.269 and 0.341, respectively. It was concluded that the MLM parameter was better than MES based on the values of MSC, CD, relative error and R. MLM predicted Weibull probability of rainfall intensity better than MES. There is a need to evaluate MLM and other probability distributions","PeriodicalId":323504,"journal":{"name":"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Assessment of Two Estimates of the Bernoulli Distribution Parameters in the Analysis of Short-Term Rainfall Intensity\",\"authors\":\"M. Asani, Adesola Oke\",\"doi\":\"10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i2.946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents an application of the maximum likelihood method and the Bernoulli distribution of selected rainfall intensity data. The parameter of the density of Bernoulli distribution was estimated by the maximum likelihood method (MLM), and Microsoft Excel Solver (MES). The calculated probabilities using the estimated parameter were evaluated statistically (analysis of variance (ANOVA), relative error, model of' selection criterion (MSC), Coefficient of Determination (CD) and Correlation coefficient (R). The study revealed that the Bernoulli probability distribution’s parameter (p) is the mean of the natural logarithm of rainfall intensity using the MLM estimator. The parameter were 0.665 and 0.535 for Makurdi, 0.695 and 0.478 for Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The relative errors were 0.479 and 0.743, and 1.141 and 1.509 for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The correlation coefficient for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES were 0.876 and 0.800, and 0.269 and 0.341, respectively. It was concluded that the MLM parameter was better than MES based on the values of MSC, CD, relative error and R. MLM predicted Weibull probability of rainfall intensity better than MES. There is a need to evaluate MLM and other probability distributions\",\"PeriodicalId\":323504,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i2.946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46792/fuoyejet.v8i2.946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了极大似然法和伯努利分布对所选降雨强度数据的应用。利用极大似然法(MLM)和Microsoft Excel Solver (MES)对伯努利分布的密度参数进行估计。通过方差分析(ANOVA)、相对误差、模型选择准则(MSC)、决定系数(CD)和相关系数(R)对估计参数计算出的概率进行了统计评估。研究表明,使用MLM估计器,伯努利概率分布的参数(p)是降雨强度自然对数的平均值。使用MLM和MES的Makurdi和Abeokuta的参数分别为0.665和0.535,0.695和0.478。MLM和MES对Makurdi和Abeokuta的相对误差分别为0.479和0.743,1.141和1.509。利用MLM和MES对Makurdi和Abeokuta的相关系数分别为0.876和0.800,0.269和0.341。基于MSC、CD、相对误差和r值,MLM对降雨强度威布尔概率的预测优于MES。有必要评估传销和其他概率分布
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Assessment of Two Estimates of the Bernoulli Distribution Parameters in the Analysis of Short-Term Rainfall Intensity
This paper presents an application of the maximum likelihood method and the Bernoulli distribution of selected rainfall intensity data. The parameter of the density of Bernoulli distribution was estimated by the maximum likelihood method (MLM), and Microsoft Excel Solver (MES). The calculated probabilities using the estimated parameter were evaluated statistically (analysis of variance (ANOVA), relative error, model of' selection criterion (MSC), Coefficient of Determination (CD) and Correlation coefficient (R). The study revealed that the Bernoulli probability distribution’s parameter (p) is the mean of the natural logarithm of rainfall intensity using the MLM estimator. The parameter were 0.665 and 0.535 for Makurdi, 0.695 and 0.478 for Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The relative errors were 0.479 and 0.743, and 1.141 and 1.509 for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES, respectively. The correlation coefficient for Makurdi and Abeokuta using MLM and MES were 0.876 and 0.800, and 0.269 and 0.341, respectively. It was concluded that the MLM parameter was better than MES based on the values of MSC, CD, relative error and R. MLM predicted Weibull probability of rainfall intensity better than MES. There is a need to evaluate MLM and other probability distributions
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信