历史街区与景观保护视角下的景观保护区住宅改造评价——以台湾高雄市岐山老街为例

Hung-Chi Sung, Mei-Fang Hsu
{"title":"历史街区与景观保护视角下的景观保护区住宅改造评价——以台湾高雄市岐山老街为例","authors":"Hung-Chi Sung, Mei-Fang Hsu","doi":"10.35745/ijssai2022v02.02.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preservation and remodeling of buildings have been contradictory issues all the time in Taiwan, and preservation oftentimes means a smaller floor-area ratio and less economic benefit. Thus, house owners are generally against building preservation policies. In order to eliminate the opposition of house owners whose buildings have higher floor-area ratios and cannot make use of them for preservation, we look into the possibilities of developing the houses of different historical significance in the“perspective landscape conservation zone” for a maximal volume of each building. We aim to enable each building to make full use of its floor-area ratio and, at the same time, to maintain the streetscape. Several types of remodeling for single or semi-detached structures are recommended by taking into consideration the needs of daily life in modern times as well as the appearances of the old street. Based on the abovementioned remodeling approach, the findings of the current study are as follows: (1) it helps to keep the minimal preservation of facades and arcades, (2) it appears to maintain the maximal preservation of facades, arcades, and atrium of the first layer of compounds, (3) the depth of the building sites must not be shorter than 16.5 m to make full use of the 240% floor-area ratio, (4) 62 out of the 95 simulated cases of the study are able to make full use of the floor-area ratio, and (5) the building sites with larger depth ratios (two layers of compounds with an atrium in between) are able to have physical preservation as well as the lifestyle and images of the sites. As the floor area is not used up, it is recommended to transfer the development rights to the remaining floor area or to another place for avoiding the loss of the original housing economic benefits. At last, a timely, flexible, and diverse option for volume controlling is set up so the street is preserved in time through appropriate approaches. Hopefully, the partial preservation and remodeling approach allows the preservation of the historical environment in practice without sacrificing the floor areas that the house owners would like to preserve in general.","PeriodicalId":377167,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Housing Renovation Evaluation in Perspective Landscape Conservation Zone for Preservation of Historical Neighborhoods and Landscapes: A Case Study of Qishan Old Street in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan\",\"authors\":\"Hung-Chi Sung, Mei-Fang Hsu\",\"doi\":\"10.35745/ijssai2022v02.02.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The preservation and remodeling of buildings have been contradictory issues all the time in Taiwan, and preservation oftentimes means a smaller floor-area ratio and less economic benefit. Thus, house owners are generally against building preservation policies. In order to eliminate the opposition of house owners whose buildings have higher floor-area ratios and cannot make use of them for preservation, we look into the possibilities of developing the houses of different historical significance in the“perspective landscape conservation zone” for a maximal volume of each building. We aim to enable each building to make full use of its floor-area ratio and, at the same time, to maintain the streetscape. Several types of remodeling for single or semi-detached structures are recommended by taking into consideration the needs of daily life in modern times as well as the appearances of the old street. Based on the abovementioned remodeling approach, the findings of the current study are as follows: (1) it helps to keep the minimal preservation of facades and arcades, (2) it appears to maintain the maximal preservation of facades, arcades, and atrium of the first layer of compounds, (3) the depth of the building sites must not be shorter than 16.5 m to make full use of the 240% floor-area ratio, (4) 62 out of the 95 simulated cases of the study are able to make full use of the floor-area ratio, and (5) the building sites with larger depth ratios (two layers of compounds with an atrium in between) are able to have physical preservation as well as the lifestyle and images of the sites. As the floor area is not used up, it is recommended to transfer the development rights to the remaining floor area or to another place for avoiding the loss of the original housing economic benefits. At last, a timely, flexible, and diverse option for volume controlling is set up so the street is preserved in time through appropriate approaches. Hopefully, the partial preservation and remodeling approach allows the preservation of the historical environment in practice without sacrificing the floor areas that the house owners would like to preserve in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":377167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2022v02.02.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Social Sciences and Artistic Innovations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35745/ijssai2022v02.02.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在台湾,建筑物的保存与改造一直是矛盾的问题,保存往往意味着更小的容积率和更低的经济效益。因此,业主普遍反对建筑保护政策。为了消除因建筑容积率较高而无法利用其进行保护的业主的反对,我们研究了在“透视景观保护区”中开发不同历史意义的房屋的可能性,以使每座建筑的体积最大化。我们的目标是使每栋建筑充分利用其容积率,同时保持街景。考虑到现代日常生活的需要以及老街的外观,建议对单个或半独立式结构进行几种类型的改造。基于上述重塑方法,本研究的研究结果如下:(1)它有助于保持立面和拱廊的最小保存,(2)它似乎保持了立面、拱廊和中庭的最大保存,(3)建筑场地的深度不得短于16.5 m,以充分利用240%的容积率,(4)研究的95个模拟案例中有62个能够充分利用容积率。(5)深度比较大的建筑遗址(两层建筑群,中间有一个中庭)既能保存遗址的实物,也能保存遗址的生活方式和形象。由于楼面面积未用完,建议将开发权转让到剩余的楼面面积或转移到其他地方,以避免丧失原有的住房经济效益。最后,建立了一个及时、灵活、多样化的体量控制选项,通过适当的方法及时保存街道。希望局部保护和改造的方法能够在不牺牲业主想要保护的建筑面积的情况下,在实践中保护历史环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Housing Renovation Evaluation in Perspective Landscape Conservation Zone for Preservation of Historical Neighborhoods and Landscapes: A Case Study of Qishan Old Street in Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
The preservation and remodeling of buildings have been contradictory issues all the time in Taiwan, and preservation oftentimes means a smaller floor-area ratio and less economic benefit. Thus, house owners are generally against building preservation policies. In order to eliminate the opposition of house owners whose buildings have higher floor-area ratios and cannot make use of them for preservation, we look into the possibilities of developing the houses of different historical significance in the“perspective landscape conservation zone” for a maximal volume of each building. We aim to enable each building to make full use of its floor-area ratio and, at the same time, to maintain the streetscape. Several types of remodeling for single or semi-detached structures are recommended by taking into consideration the needs of daily life in modern times as well as the appearances of the old street. Based on the abovementioned remodeling approach, the findings of the current study are as follows: (1) it helps to keep the minimal preservation of facades and arcades, (2) it appears to maintain the maximal preservation of facades, arcades, and atrium of the first layer of compounds, (3) the depth of the building sites must not be shorter than 16.5 m to make full use of the 240% floor-area ratio, (4) 62 out of the 95 simulated cases of the study are able to make full use of the floor-area ratio, and (5) the building sites with larger depth ratios (two layers of compounds with an atrium in between) are able to have physical preservation as well as the lifestyle and images of the sites. As the floor area is not used up, it is recommended to transfer the development rights to the remaining floor area or to another place for avoiding the loss of the original housing economic benefits. At last, a timely, flexible, and diverse option for volume controlling is set up so the street is preserved in time through appropriate approaches. Hopefully, the partial preservation and remodeling approach allows the preservation of the historical environment in practice without sacrificing the floor areas that the house owners would like to preserve in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信