在讨论中达成最终共识:与类别相关的实时意图表达的影响

Chihiro Sasaki, C. Oshima, Shin Kajihara, K. Nakayama
{"title":"在讨论中达成最终共识:与类别相关的实时意图表达的影响","authors":"Chihiro Sasaki, C. Oshima, Shin Kajihara, K. Nakayama","doi":"10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A facilitator is effective for ensuring smooth and appropriate decision-making in group discussions. In this study, we developed the “Discussion Board System” for the purpose of reproducing a part of the facilitator's function and grasping the intentions of discussion participants in real time. Each discussion participant had their own terminal on which the application was installed. The participants could show the agreement or disagreement with each keyword extracted from the other participants' utterances by moving the keywords to item boxes on their individual screens. The movements of the keywords were not visible to other participants before the discussion was over, thus each participant's screen could be considered a “semi-personal space.” In an experiment using the system, the progress and decisions of all participants were compared with each individual participant's intentions, as shown by their moving of keywords. A final decision could include the intentions of a “silent denier,” which is difficult to elicit in consideration of human relationships during typical discussions. Moreover, even though the screens were not shared among participants, the moving of each keyword to the item box could be regarded as a simple approval action of the participant's opinion. Thus, one of the positive effects of a facilitator, “fostering a sense of satisfaction” among participants, may be realized by the system.","PeriodicalId":371828,"journal":{"name":"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reaching a Final Consensus in a Discussion: the Impact of Real-time Intention Expression Related to Categories\",\"authors\":\"Chihiro Sasaki, C. Oshima, Shin Kajihara, K. Nakayama\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A facilitator is effective for ensuring smooth and appropriate decision-making in group discussions. In this study, we developed the “Discussion Board System” for the purpose of reproducing a part of the facilitator's function and grasping the intentions of discussion participants in real time. Each discussion participant had their own terminal on which the application was installed. The participants could show the agreement or disagreement with each keyword extracted from the other participants' utterances by moving the keywords to item boxes on their individual screens. The movements of the keywords were not visible to other participants before the discussion was over, thus each participant's screen could be considered a “semi-personal space.” In an experiment using the system, the progress and decisions of all participants were compared with each individual participant's intentions, as shown by their moving of keywords. A final decision could include the intentions of a “silent denier,” which is difficult to elicit in consideration of human relationships during typical discussions. Moreover, even though the screens were not shared among participants, the moving of each keyword to the item box could be regarded as a simple approval action of the participant's opinion. Thus, one of the positive effects of a facilitator, “fostering a sense of satisfaction” among participants, may be realized by the system.\",\"PeriodicalId\":371828,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)\",\"volume\":\"103 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HSI49210.2020.9142630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在小组讨论中,引导者可以有效地确保顺利和适当的决策。在本研究中,我们开发了“讨论板系统”,目的是再现部分facilitator的功能,实时掌握讨论参与者的意图。每个讨论参与者都有自己安装了应用程序的终端。参与者可以通过将关键词移动到各自屏幕上的项目框中,来表示对从其他参与者的话语中提取的每个关键词的同意或不同意。在讨论结束之前,其他参与者无法看到关键词的移动,因此每个参与者的屏幕都可以被视为“半个人空间”。在使用该系统的实验中,将所有参与者的进度和决策与每个参与者的意图进行比较,通过他们对关键词的移动来显示。最后的决定可能包括“沉默的否定者”的意图,考虑到在典型的讨论中人与人之间的关系,这很难引出。此外,即使参与者之间不共享屏幕,将每个关键字移动到项目框中也可以视为参与者意见的简单批准动作。因此,促进者的积极作用之一,即在参与者中“培养一种满足感”,可以通过该系统实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reaching a Final Consensus in a Discussion: the Impact of Real-time Intention Expression Related to Categories
A facilitator is effective for ensuring smooth and appropriate decision-making in group discussions. In this study, we developed the “Discussion Board System” for the purpose of reproducing a part of the facilitator's function and grasping the intentions of discussion participants in real time. Each discussion participant had their own terminal on which the application was installed. The participants could show the agreement or disagreement with each keyword extracted from the other participants' utterances by moving the keywords to item boxes on their individual screens. The movements of the keywords were not visible to other participants before the discussion was over, thus each participant's screen could be considered a “semi-personal space.” In an experiment using the system, the progress and decisions of all participants were compared with each individual participant's intentions, as shown by their moving of keywords. A final decision could include the intentions of a “silent denier,” which is difficult to elicit in consideration of human relationships during typical discussions. Moreover, even though the screens were not shared among participants, the moving of each keyword to the item box could be regarded as a simple approval action of the participant's opinion. Thus, one of the positive effects of a facilitator, “fostering a sense of satisfaction” among participants, may be realized by the system.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信