工作场所灵性研究的综合方法

Adriana-Mercedes Cuéllar-Juárez, José-de-Jesús Cuéllar-Juárez, J. Molina-Reyes
{"title":"工作场所灵性研究的综合方法","authors":"Adriana-Mercedes Cuéllar-Juárez, José-de-Jesús Cuéllar-Juárez, J. Molina-Reyes","doi":"10.53555/eijhss.v3i1.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though several measuring instruments for workplace spirituality have been developed to understand its effect within organizations, there is a need to develop multidimensional instruments that could show a comprehensive reality of workplace spirituality. However, there is no literature analysis identifying the ways of measuring spirituality within measuring instruments, making difficult their identification and consideration for the development of comprehensive measuring instruments. This work qualitatively analyzes concepts and measuring instruments of spirituality, religiosity, and faith to identify frequently used scale categories, and to ease future integral multidimensional research by the use of a multidimensional conceptual model. We also analyzed the disclosed scale categories within measuring instruments to find science gaps. We identified four measuring kinds in which spirituality and religiosity are studied. Also, we found that the analyzed instruments measure spirituality, religiosity, and faith partially, according to the found scale categories. This article suggests a basis to comprehensively develop future studies.","PeriodicalId":109852,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"328 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR THE STUDY OF WORKPLACE SPIRITUALITY\",\"authors\":\"Adriana-Mercedes Cuéllar-Juárez, José-de-Jesús Cuéllar-Juárez, J. Molina-Reyes\",\"doi\":\"10.53555/eijhss.v3i1.38\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though several measuring instruments for workplace spirituality have been developed to understand its effect within organizations, there is a need to develop multidimensional instruments that could show a comprehensive reality of workplace spirituality. However, there is no literature analysis identifying the ways of measuring spirituality within measuring instruments, making difficult their identification and consideration for the development of comprehensive measuring instruments. This work qualitatively analyzes concepts and measuring instruments of spirituality, religiosity, and faith to identify frequently used scale categories, and to ease future integral multidimensional research by the use of a multidimensional conceptual model. We also analyzed the disclosed scale categories within measuring instruments to find science gaps. We identified four measuring kinds in which spirituality and religiosity are studied. Also, we found that the analyzed instruments measure spirituality, religiosity, and faith partially, according to the found scale categories. This article suggests a basis to comprehensively develop future studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109852,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science\",\"volume\":\"328 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v3i1.38\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v3i1.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然已经开发了几种测量工作场所灵性的工具来了解其在组织内的影响,但仍需要开发多维工具来显示工作场所灵性的全面现实。然而,目前还没有文献分析确定测量工具内的灵性测量方法,这给它们的识别和综合测量工具的开发带来了困难。本研究定性地分析了灵性、宗教性和信仰的概念和测量工具,以确定经常使用的量表类别,并通过使用多维概念模型来简化未来的整体多维研究。我们还分析了测量仪器中披露的量表类别,以发现科学差距。我们确定了灵性和宗教信仰研究的四种测量类型。此外,我们发现所分析的工具根据所发现的量表类别部分测量灵性,宗教信仰和信仰。本文为今后全面开展研究提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACH FOR THE STUDY OF WORKPLACE SPIRITUALITY
Though several measuring instruments for workplace spirituality have been developed to understand its effect within organizations, there is a need to develop multidimensional instruments that could show a comprehensive reality of workplace spirituality. However, there is no literature analysis identifying the ways of measuring spirituality within measuring instruments, making difficult their identification and consideration for the development of comprehensive measuring instruments. This work qualitatively analyzes concepts and measuring instruments of spirituality, religiosity, and faith to identify frequently used scale categories, and to ease future integral multidimensional research by the use of a multidimensional conceptual model. We also analyzed the disclosed scale categories within measuring instruments to find science gaps. We identified four measuring kinds in which spirituality and religiosity are studied. Also, we found that the analyzed instruments measure spirituality, religiosity, and faith partially, according to the found scale categories. This article suggests a basis to comprehensively develop future studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信