{"title":"不同时间间隔氟化二胺银对乳牙玻璃修复体微渗漏的影响","authors":"Mais Zubair Jasim, Muna Saleem Khalaf","doi":"10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.01.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has shown effectiveness in hardening\ntooth structure and killing bacteria. Therefore, it can be used to prevent and arrest\ndental caries. Riva Star (SDF) treatment alone will stop cavities but will not reverse the cavitation. The Silver Modified Atraumatic Procedure, often known as\nSmart, is the optimum technique for regaining the tooth's structure and function.\nGlass ionomer was introduced in (1972) as a new material that has become one of\nthe most widely used materials in restorative dentistry. By releasing fluoride ions,\nthis material has a therapeutic impact on the surrounding tooth structure. Microleakage is the ingress of bacteria, its byproducts, toxins, chemicals, oral fluids,\nand ions between the margins of the restoration and the cavity walls. Dental restoration lifetime is significantly influenced by microleakage at the toothrestoration contact. Material and method: In this study, we used 32 primary molars, class V cavities prepared on the buccal surface of all teeth. The teeth were\ndivided into 2 groups: Group 1: 16 teeth treated with 38%SDF 8 of them restored directly with GIC filling and the other 8 restored after 14 days; Group 2:\n16 teeth as control group left untreated with 38% SDF,8 teeth restored directly\nand 8 restored after 14 days. Samples were thermocycled, immersed in 2% methylene blue and then sectioned in a buccolingual direction. Dye penetration was\nmeasured with a digital camera connected to a stereo microscope. Result: results\nof this study showed a significant difference in microleakage between two-time\nintervals in which microleakage in GIC filling decreased at 14-day intervals than\nthat of first-day interval in the experimental group, while in the control group,\nmicroleakage at 14 days intervals was higher than first-day interval, but it was\nnot significant. Conclusion: Pretreatment of the primary teeth with SDF can decrease the microleakage of GIC restoration. If placed after 14 days, the microleakage would be lesser than that if the restoration was placed directly after SDF\ntreatment. Therefore, it is recommended that SDF treatment be done, followed by\na permanent restoration after 14 days, so the null hypothesis cannot be accepted.\nKeywords: Microleakage, Silver diamine fluoride, Glass ionomer filling, noninvasive dentistry","PeriodicalId":443152,"journal":{"name":"Sumer 1","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of silver diamine fluoride on the microleakage of glass\\nionomer restoration in primary teeth at different time intervals\",\"authors\":\"Mais Zubair Jasim, Muna Saleem Khalaf\",\"doi\":\"10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.01.61\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has shown effectiveness in hardening\\ntooth structure and killing bacteria. Therefore, it can be used to prevent and arrest\\ndental caries. Riva Star (SDF) treatment alone will stop cavities but will not reverse the cavitation. The Silver Modified Atraumatic Procedure, often known as\\nSmart, is the optimum technique for regaining the tooth's structure and function.\\nGlass ionomer was introduced in (1972) as a new material that has become one of\\nthe most widely used materials in restorative dentistry. By releasing fluoride ions,\\nthis material has a therapeutic impact on the surrounding tooth structure. Microleakage is the ingress of bacteria, its byproducts, toxins, chemicals, oral fluids,\\nand ions between the margins of the restoration and the cavity walls. Dental restoration lifetime is significantly influenced by microleakage at the toothrestoration contact. Material and method: In this study, we used 32 primary molars, class V cavities prepared on the buccal surface of all teeth. The teeth were\\ndivided into 2 groups: Group 1: 16 teeth treated with 38%SDF 8 of them restored directly with GIC filling and the other 8 restored after 14 days; Group 2:\\n16 teeth as control group left untreated with 38% SDF,8 teeth restored directly\\nand 8 restored after 14 days. Samples were thermocycled, immersed in 2% methylene blue and then sectioned in a buccolingual direction. Dye penetration was\\nmeasured with a digital camera connected to a stereo microscope. Result: results\\nof this study showed a significant difference in microleakage between two-time\\nintervals in which microleakage in GIC filling decreased at 14-day intervals than\\nthat of first-day interval in the experimental group, while in the control group,\\nmicroleakage at 14 days intervals was higher than first-day interval, but it was\\nnot significant. Conclusion: Pretreatment of the primary teeth with SDF can decrease the microleakage of GIC restoration. If placed after 14 days, the microleakage would be lesser than that if the restoration was placed directly after SDF\\ntreatment. Therefore, it is recommended that SDF treatment be done, followed by\\na permanent restoration after 14 days, so the null hypothesis cannot be accepted.\\nKeywords: Microleakage, Silver diamine fluoride, Glass ionomer filling, noninvasive dentistry\",\"PeriodicalId\":443152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sumer 1\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sumer 1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.01.61\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sumer 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21931/rb/css/2023.08.01.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
氟化二胺银(SDF)已显示出硬化牙齿结构和杀死细菌的有效性。因此,它可以用来预防和抑制蛀牙。单独的Riva Star (SDF)治疗可以阻止蛀牙,但不能逆转蛀牙。银改良无创程序,通常被称为asSmart,是恢复牙齿结构和功能的最佳技术。玻璃离聚体作为一种新型材料于1972年问世,目前已成为牙科修复中应用最广泛的材料之一。通过释放氟离子,这种材料对周围的牙齿结构有治疗作用。微渗漏是指细菌及其副产品、毒素、化学物质、口腔液体和离子在修复体边缘和腔壁之间的侵入。牙体接触处的微渗漏对牙体修复寿命有显著影响。材料和方法:本研究使用32颗初生磨牙,在所有牙齿的颊面制备V类蛀牙。将16颗牙分为两组:第一组:用38%的sdf治疗16颗牙,其中8颗直接用GIC充填修复,其余8颗在14天后修复;对照组16颗牙不治疗,牙周率38%,直接修复8颗牙,14天后修复8颗牙。样品被热循环,浸入2%亚甲基蓝,然后在舌部方向切片。染料穿透度是用连接立体显微镜的数码相机测量的。结果:本研究结果显示两个时间间隔间的微渗漏有显著性差异,实验组GIC充填的微渗漏在间隔14天较间隔第1天减少,而在对照组中,间隔14天的微渗漏高于间隔第1天,但差异不显著。结论:乳牙SDF预处理可减少GIC修复体的微渗漏。如果修复体放置在14天后,微渗漏比直接放置在sdf处理后的修复体要小。因此,建议先进行SDF治疗,14天后进行永久性修复,故不能接受原假设。关键词:微渗漏;氟化二胺银;玻璃离聚体充填
The effect of silver diamine fluoride on the microleakage of glass
ionomer restoration in primary teeth at different time intervals
Silver diamine fluoride (SDF) has shown effectiveness in hardening
tooth structure and killing bacteria. Therefore, it can be used to prevent and arrest
dental caries. Riva Star (SDF) treatment alone will stop cavities but will not reverse the cavitation. The Silver Modified Atraumatic Procedure, often known as
Smart, is the optimum technique for regaining the tooth's structure and function.
Glass ionomer was introduced in (1972) as a new material that has become one of
the most widely used materials in restorative dentistry. By releasing fluoride ions,
this material has a therapeutic impact on the surrounding tooth structure. Microleakage is the ingress of bacteria, its byproducts, toxins, chemicals, oral fluids,
and ions between the margins of the restoration and the cavity walls. Dental restoration lifetime is significantly influenced by microleakage at the toothrestoration contact. Material and method: In this study, we used 32 primary molars, class V cavities prepared on the buccal surface of all teeth. The teeth were
divided into 2 groups: Group 1: 16 teeth treated with 38%SDF 8 of them restored directly with GIC filling and the other 8 restored after 14 days; Group 2:
16 teeth as control group left untreated with 38% SDF,8 teeth restored directly
and 8 restored after 14 days. Samples were thermocycled, immersed in 2% methylene blue and then sectioned in a buccolingual direction. Dye penetration was
measured with a digital camera connected to a stereo microscope. Result: results
of this study showed a significant difference in microleakage between two-time
intervals in which microleakage in GIC filling decreased at 14-day intervals than
that of first-day interval in the experimental group, while in the control group,
microleakage at 14 days intervals was higher than first-day interval, but it was
not significant. Conclusion: Pretreatment of the primary teeth with SDF can decrease the microleakage of GIC restoration. If placed after 14 days, the microleakage would be lesser than that if the restoration was placed directly after SDF
treatment. Therefore, it is recommended that SDF treatment be done, followed by
a permanent restoration after 14 days, so the null hypothesis cannot be accepted.
Keywords: Microleakage, Silver diamine fluoride, Glass ionomer filling, noninvasive dentistry