人为CO2排放的空间不确定性度量

D. Woodard, M. Branham, G. Buckingham, S. Hogue, M. Hutchins, R. Gosky, G. Marland, E. Marland
{"title":"人为CO2排放的空间不确定性度量","authors":"D. Woodard, M. Branham, G. Buckingham, S. Hogue, M. Hutchins, R. Gosky, G. Marland, E. Marland","doi":"10.1080/20430779.2014.1000793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large point sources account for as much as 60% of the anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions for some countries. Because CO2 emissions are seldom measured directly, but are generally estimated from other data, we need to understand the uncertainty of these emissions estimates. Simply stated, for any given geographical and temporal location, we would like to quantify the emissions and the associated uncertainty with as fine a resolution as possible. While US data on point sources are largely assumed to be among the best available globally, the reported locations of these sources, based on the data set used in this analysis, are estimated to differ by 0.84 km on average from their actual locations. This paper presents a metric to quantify spatial uncertainty in point sources and explains why the uncertainty in point source data cannot be described with traditional methods. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate expected emissions values for each point source and the associated spatial uncertainty is derived from these expected values. The uncertainty metric can be used to define and calibrate appropriate levels of resolution for regions with more or less reliable data sets. Gridded data are output to be incorporated into other data products reporting spatially explicit emissions estimates.","PeriodicalId":411329,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","volume":"231 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A spatial uncertainty metric for anthropogenic CO2 emissions\",\"authors\":\"D. Woodard, M. Branham, G. Buckingham, S. Hogue, M. Hutchins, R. Gosky, G. Marland, E. Marland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20430779.2014.1000793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Large point sources account for as much as 60% of the anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions for some countries. Because CO2 emissions are seldom measured directly, but are generally estimated from other data, we need to understand the uncertainty of these emissions estimates. Simply stated, for any given geographical and temporal location, we would like to quantify the emissions and the associated uncertainty with as fine a resolution as possible. While US data on point sources are largely assumed to be among the best available globally, the reported locations of these sources, based on the data set used in this analysis, are estimated to differ by 0.84 km on average from their actual locations. This paper presents a metric to quantify spatial uncertainty in point sources and explains why the uncertainty in point source data cannot be described with traditional methods. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate expected emissions values for each point source and the associated spatial uncertainty is derived from these expected values. The uncertainty metric can be used to define and calibrate appropriate levels of resolution for regions with more or less reliable data sets. Gridded data are output to be incorporated into other data products reporting spatially explicit emissions estimates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":411329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2014.1000793\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gas Measurement and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20430779.2014.1000793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

在一些国家,大型点源占人为二氧化碳排放量的60%之多。由于二氧化碳排放量很少直接测量,而通常是从其他数据估计的,我们需要了解这些排放量估计的不确定性。简而言之,对于任何给定的地理和时间位置,我们希望以尽可能精确的分辨率量化排放和相关的不确定性。虽然美国的点源数据在很大程度上被认为是全球可用的最佳数据之一,但根据本分析中使用的数据集,这些点源的报告位置估计与实际位置平均相差0.84公里。本文提出了一种量化点源空间不确定性的度量,并解释了点源数据不确定性无法用传统方法描述的原因。蒙特卡罗模拟用于计算每个点源的期望排放值,并从这些期望值推导出相关的空间不确定性。不确定度度量可用于定义和校准具有或多或少可靠数据集的区域的适当分辨率水平。网格数据的输出将并入其他数据产品,报告空间上明确的排放估计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A spatial uncertainty metric for anthropogenic CO2 emissions
Large point sources account for as much as 60% of the anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions for some countries. Because CO2 emissions are seldom measured directly, but are generally estimated from other data, we need to understand the uncertainty of these emissions estimates. Simply stated, for any given geographical and temporal location, we would like to quantify the emissions and the associated uncertainty with as fine a resolution as possible. While US data on point sources are largely assumed to be among the best available globally, the reported locations of these sources, based on the data set used in this analysis, are estimated to differ by 0.84 km on average from their actual locations. This paper presents a metric to quantify spatial uncertainty in point sources and explains why the uncertainty in point source data cannot be described with traditional methods. A Monte Carlo simulation is used to calculate expected emissions values for each point source and the associated spatial uncertainty is derived from these expected values. The uncertainty metric can be used to define and calibrate appropriate levels of resolution for regions with more or less reliable data sets. Gridded data are output to be incorporated into other data products reporting spatially explicit emissions estimates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信