心理学越多越好:强化认知行为疗法和尼古丁贴片结合强化和低强化认知行为疗法的戒烟效果

IF 2.3 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Ignacio Gabino Fernández Arias, María Paz García-Vera, Jesús Sanz
{"title":"心理学越多越好:强化认知行为疗法和尼古丁贴片结合强化和低强化认知行为疗法的戒烟效果","authors":"Ignacio Gabino Fernández Arias,&nbsp;María Paz García-Vera,&nbsp;Jesús Sanz","doi":"10.1016/S1130-5274(14)70022-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In order to compare the efficacy of smoking cessation treatment using intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (I/CBT) versus a combination of I/CBT plus nicotine patches (I/CBT+NP) or a combination of no intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy plus nicotine patches (NI/CBT+NP), a repeated measures experimental study was conducted with 235 adult smokers randomly assigned to one out of three treatments. Among patients who completed treatment (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->152), I/CBT+NP showed higher abstinence rates at 6-month follow-up and one-year follow-up than those showed by NI/CBT+NP, whereas the abstinence rates of I/CBT were not significantly different from those of the other two treatments. Results suggest that nicotine patches should always be used with a cognitive-behavioral therapy as intensive as possible. They also suggest that intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy administered alone should be given greater prominence in clinical guidelines for smoking cessation.<span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":45730,"journal":{"name":"Clinica Y Salud","volume":"25 1","pages":"Pages 1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2014-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1130-5274(14)70022-2","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuanta más psicología, mejor: eficacia para dejar de fumar de la terapia cognitiva conductual intensiva y de los parches de nicotina combinados con terapia cognitiva conductual intensiva y menos intensiva\",\"authors\":\"Ignacio Gabino Fernández Arias,&nbsp;María Paz García-Vera,&nbsp;Jesús Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1130-5274(14)70022-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In order to compare the efficacy of smoking cessation treatment using intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (I/CBT) versus a combination of I/CBT plus nicotine patches (I/CBT+NP) or a combination of no intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy plus nicotine patches (NI/CBT+NP), a repeated measures experimental study was conducted with 235 adult smokers randomly assigned to one out of three treatments. Among patients who completed treatment (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->152), I/CBT+NP showed higher abstinence rates at 6-month follow-up and one-year follow-up than those showed by NI/CBT+NP, whereas the abstinence rates of I/CBT were not significantly different from those of the other two treatments. Results suggest that nicotine patches should always be used with a cognitive-behavioral therapy as intensive as possible. They also suggest that intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy administered alone should be given greater prominence in clinical guidelines for smoking cessation.<span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1130-5274(14)70022-2\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinica Y Salud\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130527414700222\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinica Y Salud","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130527414700222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

为了比较强化认知行为疗法(I/CBT)与强化认知行为疗法加尼古丁贴片(I/CBT+NP)或不强化认知行为疗法加尼古丁贴片(NI/CBT+NP)的戒烟治疗效果,对235名成年吸烟者进行了重复测量实验研究,随机分配到三种治疗中的一种。在完成治疗的患者中(n = 152), I/CBT+NP在6个月和1年随访时的戒断率高于NI/CBT+NP,而I/CBT与其他两种治疗的戒断率无显著差异。结果表明,尼古丁贴片应与尽可能强化的认知行为疗法同时使用。他们还建议,在戒烟的临床指南中,单独使用强化认知行为疗法应该得到更大的重视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cuanta más psicología, mejor: eficacia para dejar de fumar de la terapia cognitiva conductual intensiva y de los parches de nicotina combinados con terapia cognitiva conductual intensiva y menos intensiva

In order to compare the efficacy of smoking cessation treatment using intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy (I/CBT) versus a combination of I/CBT plus nicotine patches (I/CBT+NP) or a combination of no intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy plus nicotine patches (NI/CBT+NP), a repeated measures experimental study was conducted with 235 adult smokers randomly assigned to one out of three treatments. Among patients who completed treatment (n = 152), I/CBT+NP showed higher abstinence rates at 6-month follow-up and one-year follow-up than those showed by NI/CBT+NP, whereas the abstinence rates of I/CBT were not significantly different from those of the other two treatments. Results suggest that nicotine patches should always be used with a cognitive-behavioral therapy as intensive as possible. They also suggest that intensive cognitive-behavioral therapy administered alone should be given greater prominence in clinical guidelines for smoking cessation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinica Y Salud
Clinica Y Salud PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
16
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信