双直觉逻辑中的相等与分离

Paolo Maffezioli, L. Tranchini
{"title":"双直觉逻辑中的相等与分离","authors":"Paolo Maffezioli, L. Tranchini","doi":"10.21146/2074-1472-2021-27-1-82-106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present paper we argue that a symmetric picture of the relationships between equality and apartness can be attained by considering these notions on the background of bi-intuitionistic logic instead of the usual intuitionistic logic. In particular we show that, as the intuitionistic negation of a relation of apartness is an equality, the dualintuitionistic co-negation of an equality is a relation of apartness. At the same time, as the intuitionistic negation of equality is not an apartness, the co-intuitionistic negation of an apartness is not an equality.","PeriodicalId":155189,"journal":{"name":"Logical Investigations","volume":"139 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equality and Apartness in Bi-intuitinistic Logic\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Maffezioli, L. Tranchini\",\"doi\":\"10.21146/2074-1472-2021-27-1-82-106\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the present paper we argue that a symmetric picture of the relationships between equality and apartness can be attained by considering these notions on the background of bi-intuitionistic logic instead of the usual intuitionistic logic. In particular we show that, as the intuitionistic negation of a relation of apartness is an equality, the dualintuitionistic co-negation of an equality is a relation of apartness. At the same time, as the intuitionistic negation of equality is not an apartness, the co-intuitionistic negation of an apartness is not an equality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Logical Investigations\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Logical Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2021-27-1-82-106\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logical Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2074-1472-2021-27-1-82-106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们认为在双直觉逻辑的背景下考虑相等与分离的概念可以得到相等与分离关系的对称图,而不是通常的直觉逻辑。特别地,我们证明,由于孤立关系的直观否定是一个等式,因此,一个等式的二元直观共否定是一个孤立关系。同时,由于对平等的直觉主义否定不是分离,对分离的共同直觉主义否定也不是平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equality and Apartness in Bi-intuitinistic Logic
In the present paper we argue that a symmetric picture of the relationships between equality and apartness can be attained by considering these notions on the background of bi-intuitionistic logic instead of the usual intuitionistic logic. In particular we show that, as the intuitionistic negation of a relation of apartness is an equality, the dualintuitionistic co-negation of an equality is a relation of apartness. At the same time, as the intuitionistic negation of equality is not an apartness, the co-intuitionistic negation of an apartness is not an equality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信