{"title":"传统硅烷与多用途底漆对可切削陶瓷粘结强度的影响。","authors":"Khaled Naeim, A. Attia, M. Ellayeh","doi":"10.21608/mjd.2021.199968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength to machinable glass ceramic using conventional silane and multipurpose primer after different surface treatments to composite build up. Materials and methods: A total of 64 lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramicspecimens with dimension(12X10X3) were fabricated using milling technology, thespecimens were equally divided into 4 main groups (n=16) according to the method of surface treatment as follows. In Group I: polished, Group II: Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application, Group III: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, Group IV:Monobond Etch & Prime (MEP) application. Each main group was further equally subdivided into 2 subgroups (n=8) according to methods of chemical bonding. Subgroup (A):Conventional silane.Subgroup (B):Multipurpose primer.Composite resin cylinder (Master fill) were fabricated and cemented to the treated specimens by multistep adhesive resin cement. All bonded specimens were stored in water bath for 5 months and subjected to 10000 thermal cycles. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed afterwards. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used for specimens examination .Results: The statistical analysis were done using two-way ANOVA and serial one-way ANOVAs followed by Post Hoc Tukey-HSD test at α =(0.05). Application of multipurpose primersignificantly increased SBS (P=0.001). The highest SBS mean value (14.8 ± 2.2 MPa) was obtained for APF followed by Monobond Etch & Prime with conventional silane (14.7 ± 2.8 MPa)On the other hand,APF with conventional silane showed the lowest SBS mean value(4.6 ± 2.0MPa). There was statistically significant difference between polished and APF considering conventional silane and multipurpose primer, and no statistically significant difference was reported between HF and Etch & Prim for conventional silane and multipurpose primer. Conclusions: Multipurpose primershowed superior bond strength in comparison to conventional silanewhen used for conditioning of lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramics.","PeriodicalId":308616,"journal":{"name":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramic Using Conventional Silane and Multipurpose Primer.\",\"authors\":\"Khaled Naeim, A. Attia, M. Ellayeh\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/mjd.2021.199968\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength to machinable glass ceramic using conventional silane and multipurpose primer after different surface treatments to composite build up. Materials and methods: A total of 64 lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramicspecimens with dimension(12X10X3) were fabricated using milling technology, thespecimens were equally divided into 4 main groups (n=16) according to the method of surface treatment as follows. In Group I: polished, Group II: Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application, Group III: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, Group IV:Monobond Etch & Prime (MEP) application. Each main group was further equally subdivided into 2 subgroups (n=8) according to methods of chemical bonding. Subgroup (A):Conventional silane.Subgroup (B):Multipurpose primer.Composite resin cylinder (Master fill) were fabricated and cemented to the treated specimens by multistep adhesive resin cement. All bonded specimens were stored in water bath for 5 months and subjected to 10000 thermal cycles. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed afterwards. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used for specimens examination .Results: The statistical analysis were done using two-way ANOVA and serial one-way ANOVAs followed by Post Hoc Tukey-HSD test at α =(0.05). Application of multipurpose primersignificantly increased SBS (P=0.001). The highest SBS mean value (14.8 ± 2.2 MPa) was obtained for APF followed by Monobond Etch & Prime with conventional silane (14.7 ± 2.8 MPa)On the other hand,APF with conventional silane showed the lowest SBS mean value(4.6 ± 2.0MPa). There was statistically significant difference between polished and APF considering conventional silane and multipurpose primer, and no statistically significant difference was reported between HF and Etch & Prim for conventional silane and multipurpose primer. Conclusions: Multipurpose primershowed superior bond strength in comparison to conventional silanewhen used for conditioning of lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199968\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mansoura Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/mjd.2021.199968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bond Strength of Machinable Ceramic Using Conventional Silane and Multipurpose Primer.
Purpose: To evaluate the bond strength to machinable glass ceramic using conventional silane and multipurpose primer after different surface treatments to composite build up. Materials and methods: A total of 64 lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramicspecimens with dimension(12X10X3) were fabricated using milling technology, thespecimens were equally divided into 4 main groups (n=16) according to the method of surface treatment as follows. In Group I: polished, Group II: Acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) application, Group III: Hydrofluoric acid (HF) application, Group IV:Monobond Etch & Prime (MEP) application. Each main group was further equally subdivided into 2 subgroups (n=8) according to methods of chemical bonding. Subgroup (A):Conventional silane.Subgroup (B):Multipurpose primer.Composite resin cylinder (Master fill) were fabricated and cemented to the treated specimens by multistep adhesive resin cement. All bonded specimens were stored in water bath for 5 months and subjected to 10000 thermal cycles. Shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed afterwards. Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) was used for specimens examination .Results: The statistical analysis were done using two-way ANOVA and serial one-way ANOVAs followed by Post Hoc Tukey-HSD test at α =(0.05). Application of multipurpose primersignificantly increased SBS (P=0.001). The highest SBS mean value (14.8 ± 2.2 MPa) was obtained for APF followed by Monobond Etch & Prime with conventional silane (14.7 ± 2.8 MPa)On the other hand,APF with conventional silane showed the lowest SBS mean value(4.6 ± 2.0MPa). There was statistically significant difference between polished and APF considering conventional silane and multipurpose primer, and no statistically significant difference was reported between HF and Etch & Prim for conventional silane and multipurpose primer. Conclusions: Multipurpose primershowed superior bond strength in comparison to conventional silanewhen used for conditioning of lithium disilicateIPS e.max CADceramics.