Pro-TEFL听力部分的项目特点

L. Lina, D. Mardapi, H. Haryanto
{"title":"Pro-TEFL听力部分的项目特点","authors":"L. Lina, D. Mardapi, H. Haryanto","doi":"10.4108/EAI.11-7-2019.159630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A good test should be proven theoretically and empirically. A test is considered as a good one if its items have appropriate content, language and construct based on theoretical analysis. Besides, the empirical analysis on the test items need to do in order to describe the quality of the test. Empirical item analysis can be done based on the framework of Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). This study analyzed empirically the test item characteristics based on the 1 parameter logistic (1-PL) IRT framework. The items were analyzed based on the difficulty indices. Before analyzing the test items, assessment on IRT assumptions was done; unidimensionality and local independence. The data were gathered through testing. The responses from 334 test takers on 50 items of listening section on Pro-TEFL test administered by the Center for Language Development were used as empirical data. The assessment on IRT assumptions (unidimensionality and local independence) was done by using Factor Analysis which was assisted by SPSS for windows program. The item parameter (the difficulty index) was estimated by using Program R. Results showed that the assessment on IRT assumptions can be fulfilled. Then, the analysis of item characteristics was done to estimate the item parameter based on the 1-PL IRT model. Based on the analysis on the difficulty index, there were 2 items that were considered as poor items because the difficulty indices are more than +2 and they are considered as too difficult items.","PeriodicalId":222337,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Item Characteristics on Pro-TEFL Listening Section\",\"authors\":\"L. Lina, D. Mardapi, H. Haryanto\",\"doi\":\"10.4108/EAI.11-7-2019.159630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A good test should be proven theoretically and empirically. A test is considered as a good one if its items have appropriate content, language and construct based on theoretical analysis. Besides, the empirical analysis on the test items need to do in order to describe the quality of the test. Empirical item analysis can be done based on the framework of Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). This study analyzed empirically the test item characteristics based on the 1 parameter logistic (1-PL) IRT framework. The items were analyzed based on the difficulty indices. Before analyzing the test items, assessment on IRT assumptions was done; unidimensionality and local independence. The data were gathered through testing. The responses from 334 test takers on 50 items of listening section on Pro-TEFL test administered by the Center for Language Development were used as empirical data. The assessment on IRT assumptions (unidimensionality and local independence) was done by using Factor Analysis which was assisted by SPSS for windows program. The item parameter (the difficulty index) was estimated by using Program R. Results showed that the assessment on IRT assumptions can be fulfilled. Then, the analysis of item characteristics was done to estimate the item parameter based on the 1-PL IRT model. Based on the analysis on the difficulty index, there were 2 items that were considered as poor items because the difficulty indices are more than +2 and they are considered as too difficult items.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.11-7-2019.159630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the First International Conference on Advances in Education, Humanities, and Language, ICEL 2019, Malang, Indonesia, 23-24 March 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/EAI.11-7-2019.159630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

一个好的测试应该得到理论和经验的证明。在理论分析的基础上,试题的内容、语言和结构要恰当,才能被认为是好的试题。此外,还需要对测试项目进行实证分析,以描述测试的质量。实证项目分析可以在经典测试理论和项目反应理论的框架下进行。本研究基于1参数logistic (1- pl) IRT框架对测试项目特征进行实证分析。根据难度指数对项目进行分析。在分析测试项目之前,对IRT假设进行评估;单维性和局部独立性。数据是通过测试收集的。本文采用由语言发展中心组织的Pro-TEFL考试的50个听力部分的334名考生的回答作为实证数据。采用因子分析对IRT假设(单维性和局部独立性)进行评估,并辅以SPSS for windows程序。采用程序r对项目参数(难度指数)进行估计。结果表明,对IRT假设的评估可以满足要求。然后,对项目特征进行分析,基于1-PL IRT模型估计项目参数。通过对难度指数的分析,有2个项目因为难度指数大于+2而被认为是较差的项目,被认为是难度过高的项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Item Characteristics on Pro-TEFL Listening Section
A good test should be proven theoretically and empirically. A test is considered as a good one if its items have appropriate content, language and construct based on theoretical analysis. Besides, the empirical analysis on the test items need to do in order to describe the quality of the test. Empirical item analysis can be done based on the framework of Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT). This study analyzed empirically the test item characteristics based on the 1 parameter logistic (1-PL) IRT framework. The items were analyzed based on the difficulty indices. Before analyzing the test items, assessment on IRT assumptions was done; unidimensionality and local independence. The data were gathered through testing. The responses from 334 test takers on 50 items of listening section on Pro-TEFL test administered by the Center for Language Development were used as empirical data. The assessment on IRT assumptions (unidimensionality and local independence) was done by using Factor Analysis which was assisted by SPSS for windows program. The item parameter (the difficulty index) was estimated by using Program R. Results showed that the assessment on IRT assumptions can be fulfilled. Then, the analysis of item characteristics was done to estimate the item parameter based on the 1-PL IRT model. Based on the analysis on the difficulty index, there were 2 items that were considered as poor items because the difficulty indices are more than +2 and they are considered as too difficult items.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信