18 ~ 65岁保留眼窝的患者采用切切口与不切切口的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验

Pankti Gangar, A. Benjamin, Nawamee Phadnis, C. Bhatia
{"title":"18 ~ 65岁保留眼窝的患者采用切切口与不切切口的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验","authors":"Pankti Gangar, A. Benjamin, Nawamee Phadnis, C. Bhatia","doi":"10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Primary closure is the most important step following tooth extraction. Primary closure using cut back incision technique helps in preserving the bone graft in socket and to preserve it in their desired position. To assess the healing outcome with and without cut back incision technique in adult population for the purpose of socket preservation at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial forty-two sites were planned for extraction with bone augmentation and were randomly divided. In group 1 sockets were preserved using cutback incision technique and in group 2 sockets were grafted without cutback incision technique. Clinical standardized measurements were used to assess the dimensional alterations of the extraction socket. Various non-parametric tests have been used for comparisons. Intergroup comparison showed statistical higher difference on Pain on VAS (p >0.00 6) and KGW (p 0.039) at 1 week and primary healing showed no significant results at all time intervals. The present finding concluded that use of cutback incision technique enhances primary closure and the socket seal of the extraction site with minimal pain, morbidity and low cost.","PeriodicalId":201599,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative evaluation of effectiveness with cutback incision and without cut back incision technique on healing in patients between 18 to 65 years of age for socket preservation cases: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Pankti Gangar, A. Benjamin, Nawamee Phadnis, C. Bhatia\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Primary closure is the most important step following tooth extraction. Primary closure using cut back incision technique helps in preserving the bone graft in socket and to preserve it in their desired position. To assess the healing outcome with and without cut back incision technique in adult population for the purpose of socket preservation at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial forty-two sites were planned for extraction with bone augmentation and were randomly divided. In group 1 sockets were preserved using cutback incision technique and in group 2 sockets were grafted without cutback incision technique. Clinical standardized measurements were used to assess the dimensional alterations of the extraction socket. Various non-parametric tests have been used for comparisons. Intergroup comparison showed statistical higher difference on Pain on VAS (p >0.00 6) and KGW (p 0.039) at 1 week and primary healing showed no significant results at all time intervals. The present finding concluded that use of cutback incision technique enhances primary closure and the socket seal of the extraction site with minimal pain, morbidity and low cost.\",\"PeriodicalId\":201599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.025\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Periodontology and Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijpi.2021.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

初级闭合是拔牙后最重要的步骤。采用后切切口技术进行一期闭合,有助于将骨移植物保留在窝内,并将其保留在所需的位置。在基线、1周和4周时,评估采用和不采用后切切口技术的成人保留眼窝的愈合效果。在这项单盲随机对照试验中,42个地点计划进行骨增强提取并随机划分。组1采用切切口技术保留骨臼,组2不采用切切口技术移植骨臼。采用临床标准化测量来评估拔牙槽的尺寸变化。各种非参数检验已被用于比较。各组间比较,1周VAS疼痛评分(p >0.00 6)和KGW评分(p 0.039)差异有统计学意义,各时间间隔初愈无显著差异。本研究的结论是,使用切口技术可以增强拔牙部位的初级闭合和凹窝密封,疼痛最小,发病率低,成本低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative evaluation of effectiveness with cutback incision and without cut back incision technique on healing in patients between 18 to 65 years of age for socket preservation cases: A randomized controlled trial
Primary closure is the most important step following tooth extraction. Primary closure using cut back incision technique helps in preserving the bone graft in socket and to preserve it in their desired position. To assess the healing outcome with and without cut back incision technique in adult population for the purpose of socket preservation at baseline, 1 week and 4 weeks. In this single blinded randomized controlled trial forty-two sites were planned for extraction with bone augmentation and were randomly divided. In group 1 sockets were preserved using cutback incision technique and in group 2 sockets were grafted without cutback incision technique. Clinical standardized measurements were used to assess the dimensional alterations of the extraction socket. Various non-parametric tests have been used for comparisons. Intergroup comparison showed statistical higher difference on Pain on VAS (p >0.00 6) and KGW (p 0.039) at 1 week and primary healing showed no significant results at all time intervals. The present finding concluded that use of cutback incision technique enhances primary closure and the socket seal of the extraction site with minimal pain, morbidity and low cost.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信