试图保持哲学的诚实

L. Hertzberg
{"title":"试图保持哲学的诚实","authors":"L. Hertzberg","doi":"10.1515/9783110328912.82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For Wittgenstein the struggle to maintain one’s honesty, rather than formulating certain complex ideas, was central to the difficulty of philosophy.Today many philosophers in the analytic tradition are eager to leave the influence of Wittgenstein behind. In this essay, an attempt is made to conveyan idea of the loss to philosophy that would involve. Wittgenstein’s attitudeto the problems of philosophy is captured in PI § 116: “What we do is tobring words back from their metaphysical to their everyday use”; PI § 593:“A main cause of philosophical disease – a one-sided diet: one nourishesone’s thinking with only one kind of example”; and OC § 549: “Pretensionsare a mortgage which burdens a philosopher’s capacity to think”.These remarks suggest that the way out of philosophical bewilderment is to relinquish the ambition to formulate certain ideas that will provide a solutionto it. Rather, we should quicken our sense of the way words are used bypeople who say things because they have something to say. We should letourselves be taught by the examples rather than use examples as illustrationsof preconceived solutions. In doing so we must relinquish our control of theprocess of investigation. This is perhaps the hardest thing in philosophy.","PeriodicalId":317292,"journal":{"name":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trying to keep philosophy honest\",\"authors\":\"L. Hertzberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110328912.82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For Wittgenstein the struggle to maintain one’s honesty, rather than formulating certain complex ideas, was central to the difficulty of philosophy.Today many philosophers in the analytic tradition are eager to leave the influence of Wittgenstein behind. In this essay, an attempt is made to conveyan idea of the loss to philosophy that would involve. Wittgenstein’s attitudeto the problems of philosophy is captured in PI § 116: “What we do is tobring words back from their metaphysical to their everyday use”; PI § 593:“A main cause of philosophical disease – a one-sided diet: one nourishesone’s thinking with only one kind of example”; and OC § 549: “Pretensionsare a mortgage which burdens a philosopher’s capacity to think”.These remarks suggest that the way out of philosophical bewilderment is to relinquish the ambition to formulate certain ideas that will provide a solutionto it. Rather, we should quicken our sense of the way words are used bypeople who say things because they have something to say. We should letourselves be taught by the examples rather than use examples as illustrationsof preconceived solutions. In doing so we must relinquish our control of theprocess of investigation. This is perhaps the hardest thing in philosophy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":317292,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328912.82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society - New Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110328912.82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

对于维特根斯坦来说,努力保持一个人的诚实,而不是形成某些复杂的思想,是哲学困难的核心。今天,分析传统中的许多哲学家都渴望摆脱维特根斯坦的影响。在这篇文章中,试图传达哲学的损失,这将涉及。维特根斯坦对哲学问题的态度在PI§116中得到了体现:“我们所做的是把词语从形而上学的用途带回到日常用途”;PI§593:“哲学疾病的一个主要原因——片面的饮食:一个人只用一种例子来滋养自己的思想”;法典第549条:“自命为哲学家的思考能力的负担”。这些评论表明,摆脱哲学困惑的方法是放弃制定某些思想以提供解决方案的野心。相反,我们应该加快我们对那些因为有话要说而说话的人使用单词的方式的感觉。我们应该让自己从例子中学习,而不是用例子来说明先入为主的解决方案。这样做,我们必须放弃对调查过程的控制。这也许是哲学中最难的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trying to keep philosophy honest
For Wittgenstein the struggle to maintain one’s honesty, rather than formulating certain complex ideas, was central to the difficulty of philosophy.Today many philosophers in the analytic tradition are eager to leave the influence of Wittgenstein behind. In this essay, an attempt is made to conveyan idea of the loss to philosophy that would involve. Wittgenstein’s attitudeto the problems of philosophy is captured in PI § 116: “What we do is tobring words back from their metaphysical to their everyday use”; PI § 593:“A main cause of philosophical disease – a one-sided diet: one nourishesone’s thinking with only one kind of example”; and OC § 549: “Pretensionsare a mortgage which burdens a philosopher’s capacity to think”.These remarks suggest that the way out of philosophical bewilderment is to relinquish the ambition to formulate certain ideas that will provide a solutionto it. Rather, we should quicken our sense of the way words are used bypeople who say things because they have something to say. We should letourselves be taught by the examples rather than use examples as illustrationsof preconceived solutions. In doing so we must relinquish our control of theprocess of investigation. This is perhaps the hardest thing in philosophy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信