想象的框架和技术的生活经验:采访劳拉·弗兰诺

Laura Forlano, Stan Ruecker
{"title":"想象的框架和技术的生活经验:采访劳拉·弗兰诺","authors":"Laura Forlano, Stan Ruecker","doi":"10.7764/DISENA.13.58-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this interview conducted by Stan Ruecker, Laura Forlano gives some clues of what designers can learn from the critical thinking the social sciences have developed for decades: challenging key terms, overturning narratives, and being critical about the way new technologies are being framed and presented. She asks for designers to commit to a position. She points out that because each new technology will inevitably fail, designers might be more effective if they think of people not only using technology, but also having to take care of it.","PeriodicalId":270818,"journal":{"name":"Revista Diseña","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Imaginary Framing and the Lived Experience of Technologies: Interview with Laura Forlano\",\"authors\":\"Laura Forlano, Stan Ruecker\",\"doi\":\"10.7764/DISENA.13.58-83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this interview conducted by Stan Ruecker, Laura Forlano gives some clues of what designers can learn from the critical thinking the social sciences have developed for decades: challenging key terms, overturning narratives, and being critical about the way new technologies are being framed and presented. She asks for designers to commit to a position. She points out that because each new technology will inevitably fail, designers might be more effective if they think of people not only using technology, but also having to take care of it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":270818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Diseña\",\"volume\":\"234 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Diseña\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7764/DISENA.13.58-83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Diseña","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7764/DISENA.13.58-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在Stan Ruecker的采访中,Laura Forlano给出了一些线索,说明设计师可以从社会科学几十年来发展起来的批判性思维中学习到什么:挑战关键术语,推翻叙述,对新技术的框架和呈现方式持批判态度。她要求设计师承诺一个职位。她指出,因为每一项新技术都不可避免地会失败,如果设计师不仅要考虑到人们使用技术,还要考虑到他们必须照顾技术,他们可能会更有效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Imaginary Framing and the Lived Experience of Technologies: Interview with Laura Forlano
In this interview conducted by Stan Ruecker, Laura Forlano gives some clues of what designers can learn from the critical thinking the social sciences have developed for decades: challenging key terms, overturning narratives, and being critical about the way new technologies are being framed and presented. She asks for designers to commit to a position. She points out that because each new technology will inevitably fail, designers might be more effective if they think of people not only using technology, but also having to take care of it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信